Tag: WTC 7
9/11 After 18 Years
Sep 13, 2019 | Viewpoints, Politics, US
What we have learned in these 18 years since 9/11 is that thousands of experts with hard evidence cannot prevail over a transparent official lie.
Read MoreThe Official Story of the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Lies in Ruins
Sep 6, 2019 | Viewpoints, Politics, US
A research team at the University of Alaska’s engineering department has concluded that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11.
Read MoreThe Costs of 9/11 Continue to Mount
Sep 11, 2018 | Viewpoints, Politics, US
The costs of 9/11 do not stop at destroyed buildings and lives lost, but include the shredding of the US Constitution, civil liberty, and the rule of law.
Read More16th Anniversary of 9/11 Brings New Development
Sep 15, 2017 | News & Analysis, Science, US
An engineering team at the University of Alaska has presented evidence falsifying the government’s official explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11.
Read MoreOn “Conspiracy Theory”
Aug 26, 2017 | Viewpoints, Politics, US
Americans are a thoroughly brainwashed people who believe that any explanation that differs from the officially-blessed one is a conspiracy theory.
Read More9/11 Destroyed America
Apr 24, 2017 | Viewpoints, Politics, US
9/11 was the manufactured excuse for the destruction of liberty in the US and 16 years of devastating countries and creating refugees.
Read MoreWATCH: Incontrovertible (Documentary on 9/11)
Dec 23, 2016 | News & Analysis, Europe, Politics, US
Incontrovertible examines the Western media’s reporting on the events of 9/11, with a particular focus on the BBC and collapse of WTC 7.
Read MoreIs the Saudi 9/11 Story Part Of The Deception?
Jul 22, 2016 | US, Politics, Viewpoints
The official 9/11 story has taken too many hits to remain standing.
Read More9/11: The Best Physical Evidence of Explosives
Mar 10, 2014 | US, News & Analysis, Science
David Chandler gives an excellent guest lecture on the evidence of explosives in the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11.
Read MoreAre Tall Buildings Safer As a Result of the NIST WTC Reports?
What changes have been made as a result of the World Trade Center (WTC) investigation conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)?
Read More9/11 and Skeptic Magazine’s ‘Science’ of Controlled Demolitions
Sep 16, 2011 | US, Featured, Science, Viewpoints
Chris Mohr’s denial of the controlled demolition of WTC 7 in Skeptic Magazine simply illustrates how willful ignorance sustains the official explanation.
Read MoreWTC 7: A Refutation of the Official Account
Sep 14, 2011 | US, News & Analysis, Science
David Chandler refutes the official account of the collapse of WTC 7 at the Toronto Hearings on September 10, 2011.
Read MoreArchitects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
Aug 19, 2011 | US, News & Analysis, Science
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth present evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC 7 in this documentary.
Read More9/11 Skeptopathy: Pathological Skepticism In Support of the Falsified Official Story
True skepticism is vital for scientific inquiry. Pathological skepticism, however, as 9/11 sketopathy illustraets, is not about science, but faith.
Read MoreWhy the NIST WTC 7 Report is False
Jul 10, 2011 | US, News & Analysis, Science
Few people seem to know why the official report for World Trade Center building 7 is false and unscientific.
Read MoreThe Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Case Far From Closed
Feb 15, 2011 | News & Analysis, Featured, Science, US
An examination of the two opposing hypotheses for the destruction of World Trade Center 7 rules out the official explanation of fire-induced collapse.
Read MoreA Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse
Feb 14, 2011 | US, Science, Viewpoints
The inescapable and disturbing conclusion is that the most scientific theory available for the WTC 7 collapse is that it was a controlled demolition, brought down with explosives.
Read MoreThe Washington Post on ‘lunatic’ 9/11 ‘conspiracy theorists’
Mar 9, 2010 | Editorial, US, Viewpoints
While serving out a hit piece against the global “9/11 Truth” movement, it is in fact the editors of the Washington Post who are demonstrably “fact-averse”.
Read More