Approximately $600 billion in Biden-era clean energy spending has remained intact through mid-2026, outlasting sustained efforts by the Trump administration to unwind the previous government’s climate agenda.

A Politico analysis lays out a detailed scorecard of what survived, what was cut, and what remains tangled in legal disputes nearly a year and a half into the Trump presidency.

Over $540 billion in clean energy tax breaks, covering electric vehicles and a wide range of renewable technologies, were eliminated as part of the administration’s broader reversal of Biden climate policy.

Of the nearly $1 trillion in direct spending components tied to the clean energy agenda, the Trump administration targeted roughly $60 billion for cuts, representing approximately 6% of the total.

Despite that relatively modest target, efforts to claw back those funds have been stalled by a combination of litigation and bureaucratic disputes that have dragged on for much of the past 18 months.

The Department of Energy reviewed its funding awards across the portfolio and, in most cases, chose to maintain or restore them rather than pursue aggressive terminations.

The Environmental Protection Agency took a notably harder line, terminating grants totaling $29 billion, a figure that drew immediate legal challenges from recipients and state governments.

Courts have since reinstated some of those terminated EPA awards, leaving the final financial tally unsettled and subject to further judicial proceedings.

At least $30 billion in terminated awards were concentrated in blue states and congressional districts represented by Democratic lawmakers, adding a sharp political dimension to the funding disputes.

The Politico analysis arrives at a pivotal moment, with congressional funding debates over the next fiscal year converging alongside the approach of November elections that could reshape the legislative landscape.

The durability of the remaining $600 billion reflects both the structural design of the original legislation and the difficulty any administration faces in unwinding congressionally appropriated funds once they have been committed or legally obligated.

The outcome of ongoing court cases and legislative negotiations is expected to determine whether the surviving funding holds through the remainder of the current political cycle or faces a renewed round of challenges.