A Case Study in Zionist Methodology & Academic Corruption
Conclusion
After months of confabulation between the Chief Ombudsman, Beverley Wakem, and Roy Crawford, they came up with a “solution” that they hoped both Mr Wilson and myself would accept: Crawford stated that “errors” might have been made in the thesis, but there is nothing unusual about this. Wilson and myself were given the opportunity to submit corrections to these “errors” to Van Leeuwen, and – if he chose – he might include an addendum in the hard copy version of the thesis deposited at the University library.[48] These proposals were rejected because acceptance would mean conceding that Van Leeuwen had made a few “errors” whereas the contention is that he is a liar and a fraud and his Masterate needs to be revoked on the grounds of dishonesty. The Ombudsman, Ms Wakem, refused to reopen her enquiry into the University’s antics. She would not or could not respond to my repeatedly having pointed out that Crawford had stated that the University would investigate whether the thesis was of adequate standard, but did not do so.
As for how this all relates to Joel Hayward’s new predicament, based on my own experiences and observations with those who were involved with actions against Hayward previously in New Zealand, it seems reasonable to hypothesize that Hayward is again a target of ongoing vindictiveness. Hayward has not been forgotten by his detractors, despite his having been at pains to repudiate the conclusions of his 1993 MA thesis, and having apologized repeatedly. Around late 2008 information from a well-placed source came to this writer that certain of these detractors in New Zealand had suggested to Hayward’s employers in England that he had been “advising” me on the Van Leeuwen complaint (as if I needed advice), presumably with slanderous remarks about my being a “holocaust denier,” etc. Hayward has again put his neck on the chopping block with his efforts to repudiate anti-Muslim sentiment in the military. Such actions can only have aggravated those who have long sought his ruin.
Additionally, it is an example of where “scholarship” and “research” can sink when they are adulterated with vested interests; in this instance those of Zionists; and how craven University administrators and academics will be when faced with such pressures. The Van Leeuwen matter has rendered tertiary education in New Zealand, especially in the social sciences, suspect and there are institutions here that appear to operate, at least in certain faculties, as no better than diploma mills.
Notes
[1] For a comprehensive account of the Hayward saga see: Dr Thomas Fudge, “The Fate of Joel Hayward in New Zealand Hands: from Holocaust Historian to Holocaust?” http://www.joelhayward.com/thehistorynowarticle.htm
Fudge’s article appeared in the journal of the History Department, Canterbury University, Christchurch, History Now, vol. 9, No. 2, May 2003, pp. 12-21. However, the University took fright after pressure from unnamed sources, destroyed the entire edition in a New Zealand example of book burning, and published another edition that excluded Fudge’s article. Fudge resigned his post at the University in protest.
[2] Thomas Fudge, ibid.
[3] “Research Publications for Dov Bing,” Waikato University, http://www.waikato.ac.nz/php/research.php?mode=show&author=412&mode=show&page=1
[4] I Gallagher, “Ayatollah of the RAF,” Mail Online, London, August 7, 2011, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023246/RAF-academic-head-Dr-Joel-Hayward-Muslim-convert-criticises-Libya-air-strikes.html
[5] I Gallagher, ibid.
[6] I Gallagher, ibid.
[7] I Gallagher, ibid.
[8] J Hayward, “Islam & War,” http://www.islamandwar.com/
[9] S Scanlon, “Making History,” Christchurch Press, May 20, 2000.
[10] R W Van Leeuwen, Dreamers of the Dark, MA Thesis, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2008, i, ii.
[11] J Hayward, http://www.joelhayward.com/myoverviewcontd.htm
[12] Hayward Thesis Working Party Report, http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/hayward/report.pdf 2.47, p. 29.
Also: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/hayward/
[13] Prof. Middleton, Kupka Report, Appendix Q, “Confidential Memo,” May 1 2000, To Members of the Post Graduate Studies Committee, http://unipr.waikato.ac.nz/news/kupka_report/pdf/q.pdf.
[14] J Braddock, “NZ Herald covers up reasons for sacking anti-Zionist cartoonist,” World Socialist Web Site, January 20, 2004, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/newz-j20.shtml
[15] R Crawford, Waikato University, Hamilton, terms of reference for working party enquiry, October 8, 2008, p. 2, Section 3 a and b.
[16] R Crawford to K R Bolton, June 30, 2009.
[17] My contention is that this was not a matter of “inaccuracies” but of lies.
[18] N Brennan to K R Bolton, July 7, 2009.
[19] N Brennan to K R Bolton, telephone conversation.
[20] Mr Wilson had been a friend of Van Leeuwen’s and was acknowledged for his help with the thesis. They had known each other through interests in occultism and through Freemasonry. In fact Wilson had only ever seen three draft chapters, none of which were subsequently used in the thesis. Mr Wilson was as appalled as myself at Van Leeuwen, whom he regards as a “liar.” He is indignant at being acknowledged for helping Van Leeuwen in this fraudulence. The news media however carefully avoided mentioning that Wilson was also a complainant and opted instead on smearing this writer, rather than uncovering the corruption at Waikato. Interestingly, Crawford has described Wilson as a “knowledgeable expert’ on the subject, but his complaint got no further than my own.
[21] R Crawford, “Complaint regarding W R Van Leeuwen’s Thesis,” December 8, 2010, 2.2.4.
[22] R Crawford, ibid., 3.4.3.
[23] R Miller, Manager HR Shared Services, Victoria University, to K R Bolton, September 17, 2009.
[24] Tertiary Education Union, July 16, 2009, http://teu.ac.nz/2009/07/waikato%E2%80%99s-anti-neo-nazi-thesis-back-on-shelves/
[25] D Bing e-mail to K R Bolton, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 9:21 a.m.The grammar and the spelling are Bing’s.
[26] K R Bolton e-mail to D Bing, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 5:49 PM
[27] D Bing e-mail to K R Bolton, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 5:37 p.m.
[28] D Bing e-mail to K R Bolton, Monday, 3 November 2008 6:42 p.m. I never had “two websites” on the matter, nor had I closed any down.
[29] S Williams to K R Bolton, November 7, 2008.
[30] There had been many more requests from me via e-mail and letter.
[31] Gillian Spry, Norris Ward McKinnon Lawyers to K R Bolton, December 18, 2008.
[32] R Crawford to K R Bolton, March 2, 2011.
[33] Zionist Federation of NZ, http://www.zfnz.org.nz/Web.asp?Page=197
[34] http://diogenes-stone.livejournal.com/21823.html
[35] New Zealand Jewish Council.
[36] W R Van Leeuwen, “Live Journal” entry, April 27, 2006.
[37] N Brennan, “Thesis can’t shake controversy,” Waikato Times, July 7, 2009.
[38] W R Van Leeuwen, October 14, 2006, http://diogenes-stone.livejournal.com/1328.html
[39] Van Leeuwen is a Freemason III°, a Masonic “Kellerman Lecturer,” an initiate of the Golden Dawn derivative, the Order of the Table Round, and of the Builders of the Adytum. His associations include Satanists. I mention this because much nonsense was claimed about me being an “occultist,” which I am not.
Among Van Leeuwen’s ten Facebook friends, the most interesting is a self-styled Satanist, “Venus Satanas.” Van Leeuwen, http://www.facebook.com/roelvl
She states of herself:
I am Venus Satanas. I have had an interest in the occult for many years. I am a theistic Satanist. I am independent. I enjoy the occult, magic, tarot and spirituality. Many have seen my videos on youtube where I discuss the various practices of Satanism. Venus Satanas, http://www.facebook.com/people/Venus-Satanas/1172362777
This is only raised here because of Van Leeuwen’s own convoluted methods of guilt by association.
[40] W R Van Leeuwen, January 28, 2007http://diogenes-stone.livejournal.com/15094.html
[41] W R Van Leeuwen, February 19, 2007, http://diogenes-stone.livejournal.com/19887.html
[42] W R Van Leeuwen, April 25, 2007
[43] W R Van Leeuwen, April 29, 2007.
[44] J Drummond, “Dark Dreams,” Nexus, July 13, 2009, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ED0907/S00049.htm
[45] “Opinions of Four Holocaust scholars on Mr Kupka’s internet postings,” p. 2 (A) Professor Konrad Kwiet. http://unipr.waikato.ac.nz/news/kupka_report/pdf/i.pdf
[46] Ibid., p. 2.
[47] K R Bolton to Konrad Kwiet, June 24, 2011, “Re: W R Van Leeuwen Thesis, Waikato University, 2008.”
[48] R Crawford to K R Bolton, “Complaint Regarding W R Van Leeuwen Thesis,” December 8 2010, 5.1 – 5.3.3.
The hold Jews have on people’s mind is stunning. You can’t even do an academic exercise without running the risk of having yourself exorcised. Why are Jews given this honour of being beyond the “law”? I have often wondered why Jewss have been harassed for centuries in Europe. Is it becaue of their beligerence? Is it the way they make their money? Must be something terrible for people to develop an anti Jewish stance. My impression is that they want to “take” and never “give”. Yehudi Menuhin’s speech to the Israili Knesset was remarkable for its straight forwardness and sincerity. At the end of the speech, there was only silence. What has become of the Jewish people?
As a skeptic of both sides of the Holocaust debate – was there or wasn’t there, and if there wasn’t, then what? – I’ve long hoped for a book that would shed light where there was only heat. DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST comes as close as I can hope for, and it is a remarkable accomplishment.
Rather than writing a review longer than the book itself, I’ll just first note that with Thomas Dalton’s book, the biggest single problem has finally been addressed, That It Has Been Impossible To Grasp The Big Picture Of The Holocaust Because Of The Incoherence Of The Story. The goals of Nazi policy, the means by which it was ordered and carried out, major events and where they happened (nobody really knows where the burial and cremation grounds of Chelmno are), the technical challenges that would come with a mass extermination effort, even something as basic as the death totals; nothing about the Holocaust story is consistent from one source to another. Over the decades figures, testimonies and documents have been exaggerated, reduced, misrepresented, changed or even disappeared, and in many cases with the obvious goal of keeping certain details a mystery so that awkward questions don’t come up (Saul Friedländer – I’m talking to you!). When Dalton writes that he found “…a Holocaust story in tatters…” he simply states the truth, and it is easy to see why two important historians, Michel De Bouard and Jean-Claude Pressac, remarked that the historical record of the Holocaust is “rotten”.
More:
http://www.amazon.com/Debating-Holocaust-Look-Both-Sides/dp/1591480051/ref=pd_rhf_p_t_2
Until a few years ago I believed everything about the holocaust ; the 6 million, extermination camps, gas chambers & ovens. After hearing some of bishop Williamson’s arguments, I did research myself. As a result, there is NOTHING I believe anymore of this story. The Germans needed labour in their factories and were short in energy ; it makes no sense then to kill people and burn them. Apart from this ; the Auschwitz gas chamber was only built AFTER the war (as the Auschwitz director admitted on video),and according to the International Red Cross, the total number of deaths in the concentration camps was 273.000. The official number of Auschwitz deaths was first set a 4 million, then 1,5 million and now it is 501.000. The REAL number was 53.000 (Red Cross).
The HOLOHOAX was created to scare jews out of Europe, to make them unite behind zionism, to allow the creation of the zionist state and to rip off the Germans for 100 billion. What a scam !
And we still have to believe all the lies.
The Jews are in control. You can fight it, but YOU will lose (be crucified, like the subject of this article).
(Yet another) invitation to martyrdom – this one in a very good cause.
500 hundred million Arab people are Semites which include most of the Lebanese and those in the occupied territories. thus the term anti-Semitism as it only applies to Jew is nonsense.
There are hundreds, if not thousands of cases of academic bullying by militant Jews and Zionists, against academics, across the world.
This very small, but very influental and vocal ethnic group are something akin to a fifth column within our midst.
That they own or control all the world’s major media outlest and seem to have control over the US Government and banks puts them in a very dangerous position.
To be told to believe only one side of the story is thought control.
Maybe Joel Hayward’s thesis could be published so we can all have an opinion