Pakistan rebuffs attempts by shutting down military supply route for US/NATO forces
This strained relations between the Pentagon and the Pakistan Army. Reportedly, the crisis in US-Pakistan relations and the supply chain trauma that ISAF had to face on account of route closure led to Jones’s departure ahead of his planned retirement later this year. Gareth Porter, writing for Inter Press Service, reports that “President Obama has clearly abandoned the tough line toward Pakistan represented by cross-border helicopter attacks and accelerated drone strikes in an effort to reduce tensions.”
In pushing his unilateral escalation of force, General Petraeus allowed the element of distrust to creep back into US-Pakistan relations that President Obama has been taking pains to remove after a long period of strained relations.
NATO Secretary General Anders Rasmussen was the first to regret the incident, pleading that the killing of three Pakistani soldiers was unintended. They initially dragged their feet, but later, under a White House directive, the US Ambassador in Islamabad, Ms. Anne Peterson, and ISAF Commander, General David Petraeus, made public apologies. This was followed by a letter from Admiral Mike Mullen to Pakistan’s army chief General Kayani expressing his deep regrets over the incident.
By closing the border crossing, Pakistan established a powerful leverage over Washington and US/NATO command, one it can use in the future to protect Pakistan’s sovereignty, stop cross-border raids, and curtail drone attacks.
By forcing Washington to back off, Pakistan conveyed several clear messages. Pakistan is no Afghanistan and could not be taken for granted; its sovereignty and its national boundaries must be respected; its patience also has limits despite its close alliance with the US; and carrying the war into this country of 175 million people would, after all, not be a piece of cake. It also carried the reminder that Pakistan’s assistance remained a key element in ISAF’s operations in Afghanistan and is dependent upon respect for its sensitivities.
Although the US/NATO command pretends that alternate supply routes via Central Asian countries could be used, the fact is that this will involve massive airlifts and time delays and has not been found very viable.
This episode also made clear that the term Af-Pak coined by the Americans was a misnomer and should not be misinterpreted to mean that Afghanistan and Pakistan can be lumped together by ISAF for operational purposes. Pakistan is a separate entity, a sovereign country, which jealously guards it geographical boundaries. The mandate that ISAF was given for Afghanistan neither applied to Pakistan nor could be extended to it.
The resulting scenario might even influence the Obama administration’s thinking towards the war in another way. US officials have concluded that the war will remain unwinnable unless Pakistan changes its policy towards suspected Taliban sanctuaries in FATA. But if Pakistan refuses to change its policy and persists with a firm stand like the one it took recently, and if this forces Washington to back off like it did now, this might strengthen President Obama’s hand in insisting on a drawdown of troops to begin in July 2011.
There are widespread concerns about a spiraling rise in CIA drone strikes in Waziristan that are inflicting heavy casualties. For several years, CIA drones have attacked targets within FATA that were labeled as insurgent sanctuaries. While the US calls every one killed a terrorist, the fact is that numerous innocent men, women, and children have lost their lives or have been injured and maimed. The seething tribesmen who suffer these losses become Taliban sympathizers, some even joining their ranks. In the end, the backlash translates into growing militancy in Pakistan.
The US has no legal mandate for drone attacks within the borders of another sovereign country, and they amount to state terrorism that is in grave violation of human rights and of international law. The Zardari government remains completely unresponsive. A former chief of Pakistan’s army, Gen. Mirza Aslam Beg, has demanded of the Pakistan Air Force to shoot down US drones — sentiments that are widely shared by the people and the rank and file of the armed forces.
Word has been leaked by the Zardari government that it follows an agreement between the former regime of President Musharraf and the US administration in allowing these attacks. Being an extremely important issue of public interest, this agreement, if there is one, must be released to the public.
The government is bound by the Constitution to protect the life, liberty and property of its citizens and is therefore under obligation to revoke this unlawful agreement, unilaterally if necessary, as it illegally allows a foreign government to slaughter non-combatant Pakistani citizens on mere suspicion of being terrorists, without apportioning blame or giving them a fair trial.
And if the Zardari government deliberately turns a blind eye to the killings of its citizens by a foreign power in exchange for the $2 billion in US aid annually and tens of millions of dollars in “black” payments it receives from CIA, it becomes an accomplice in the extra judicial killings of its citizens and must be held accountable.
LOL! The author refers to the Pak military as ‘ world class’. They fought 4 wars with India and lost badly,all of them. Currently, they are unable to fight Talibans. May be they are ‘world class’ in Islamabad.
Hello Andew,
1971 Pak army did surrendered. However credit goes to covert support of india to Mukti Bahani (trained and sent by India). However as far as Kargil (1999, 3 month conflict) is concerned, your knowledge is not based on facts. Indian General who led Kargil war is himself admitting that we lost it in Strategic terms. You can see his interview at the following link.
http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/not-convinced-if-we-won-kargil-lt-gen-kishan-pal-28718.php
Please also have a look Pakistan Airforce page in Wikipedia.
Regards,
Dilu.
Andrew; if Pakistan has lost all wars BADLY against India then can you tell me how much of the Pakistani territory is under indian possession now? Fact is that almost all wars ended up in stalemates and none of the side was having a decisive edge over the other. I do give much credit to Pakistan army because Pakistan is a poor country as compared to India, less resources, less military man power but still they after all these wars India was never allowed to dominate in any area. Liberation war of Bangladesh in which india was also involved can not be used to judge the level of an army as it was a poltical dispute and ppl of Bangladesh were not willing to live with pakistan.
This author has no ideal what he’s talking about. Iraq was also world class. We are not afraid of any Muslim country period. They wanted a war and pretty much they are going to get what they wanted. The trade center started this mess and we will finish this project.
Pakistan military strength:
http://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=Pakistan
The only thing “world class” that I see here is James Smith’s startling ignorance and jingoism.
The “All Muslims = Terrorists” ideology is appalling and absurd. If you truly think “the trade center started this mess,” then you clearly have no sense of the real history of US imperialism and militarism in the Middle East, let alone the rest of the world.
It’s funny to me to read these things online. There is always the people that believe whole heartedly that America is a terrorist and fading world power who knows nothing but punishing other countries with war. Then there are the people that subscribe to the theory that every other country is wrong and you can’t beat America at anything. Here’s the point, Pakistan is hosting Al Qaeda and Bin Laden(the military’s number one priority), and they have been since very close to the beginning of this conflict. Unfortunately for the US(and Middle Eastern countries) it’s very difficult to not look like the bad guy during war. You need to see the mission for our government is to eliminate Al Qaeda and terrorist cells throughout our Area of Operation(a.k.a. Afghanistan and Pakistan). There is obviously more complex issues that the war is comprised of, but at the root of it all that is our objective. We’re not out to destroy alliances, we’re not looking for perenial war, and we’re certainly not fighting in Vietnam like the author suggests. This is it’s own beast, with a plethora of it’s own issues. Accept it or change it, otherwise please have respect for the less than 1% of your population that actually is wrapped up in the mess over there.
This article comes across as very anti American. That being said I do think that the war is with Islam and Islam is an Arab concoction best being fought with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis fund this crappy version of Islam with oil money made from the 1970 boom of oil prices. The majority of terrorists from 9/11 are Saudis who their group is hiding in Afghanistan to draw attention to that area and not Saudi Arabia.
By going in to Saudi Arabia you can kill ties with an oppressive government and limit funding to terrorism that helps fund terrorist world wide. Islam is a fascist system and even more so under Saudi governess. We can learn from WWII, and strike early before this gets to far out of control.
The Pakistan Armed Forces lost no wars. They always thwarted and withheld Indian aggression. Bangladesh was a political problem and it remains a Muslim state, majority of the people hating India and its efforts to make it a client state in the pattern of Nepal and Bhutan. Sikkim has already been gulped. Pakistan remains a thorn in in the Indian efforts to prevail over its neighbors. Even today after the many wars imposed on Pakistan, its living standards are better than that of India where more than twice the population of Pakistan lives in abject poverty, hunger and malnutrition.
As far as the Armed Forces of Pakistan are concerned, the Pakistan Air Force has been recognized as one of the best. The army is battle hardened and let no one, particularly its enemies take it lightly. Please do not forget Pakistan is also a nuclear power and if and when the lines are drawn an appropriate and befitting response awaits the enemy.
Some of the readers comments are astonishing. They still profess they can brow beat the world into submission through force and coercion. Not so; your own downfall has already begun. Don’t hasten it by taking more suicidal actions. It is better to live in peace with the world than to be hated by practically the whole world. The American people don’t deserve such a fate as basically they are good human beings.
The issue under discussion here was not the professionalism of Pakistan’s military, but since the issue has been raised let me set the record straight. Pakistan’s army and the air force are much too small compared to India but in the three wars that were fought, the Indians were beaten back or held at bay in ground warfare. Pakistani soldiers recorded historical show of courage and professionalism.
As for the air force I will quote just one instance. Pakistan Air Force holds the world record of a single pilot (M.M. Alam) shooting down 5 Indian fighters in air combat in a matter of few seconds. The history of these three wars is replete with many such accounts of heroism and professionalism. I wish those who express doubts about Pakistan’s military being world class had the background knowledge of this military or its performance. They apparently speak just because they must object.
If you want the latest evidence, let me tell you that Pakistani soldiers won a gold medal in Cambrian patrol 2010 competition among 750 soldiers from different countries, held in Australia. Watch a clip on this video link…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVh-EBUwlFo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVh-EBUwlFo
Attach a file
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVh-EBUwlFo
hif ch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVh-EBUwlFo
The article erroneously points out that the United States is testing waters for escalating the Afghan war into Pakistan. That is not the case. The cross border Khost incident was an honest mistake and a joint ISAF and Pakistan commission concluded that. The ISAF and The US officials apologized for the mistake and gave assurance that it will not be repeated. It is never our intention to violate Pakistan’s air space and kill innocents. It must be realized that Both Pakistan and the United States are fighting a common and ruthless enemy who kill and destroy without remorse. The incident happened while our forces were pursuing this same murderous group.
The notion of a “perpetual war” is likewise without basis. Readers will recall that the US signed a strategic framework agreement two years ago with the sovereign government of Iraq, which provided for the drawdown and eventual withdrawal of our forces from that country. The US has lived up to that agreement, meeting every milestone either on time or, in the case of withdrawing all of our combat brigades, before the deadlines. After training the Afghan security forces to take control of law and security situation in Afghanistan, we fully intend to do the same in that country. In the meanwhile both Pakistan and the United States will have to clear the region of any Taliban influence so people of both Afghanistan and Pakistan can live in peace along with the rest of the world.
We can be cynical and scream conspiracy theory in everything that the United States does but the fact remains that we have amongst us enemies who have been killing innocents day in and day out. It is the US that is helping both Afghanistan and Pakistan to get rid of this menace.
LCDR Bill Speaks
DET- United States Central Command
http://www.centcom.mil
With all due respect, Bill Speaks, it is because of U.S. actions in Afghanistan and Pakistan that this ruthless enemy you rightly characterize as such exists in the first place.
Also, it can hardly be said that the illegal drone strikes in Pakistan are “honest mistakes”. When you say “It is never our intention to violate Pakistan’s air space”, you speak for the military. But what about CIA drone strikes? It cannot be said that this is not an intentional violation of Pakistan’s air space on the part of the U.S. How can the U.S.-led NATO/ISAF forces on one hand claim a right of “hot pursuit” and on the other deny intending to violate Pakistan’s air space? Need I remind you NATO initially defended the attack, and the apology you refer to only followed Pakistan’s decision to respond by halting the supply line via Pakistan?
Pakistan Ledership Military and Civilian are a complete joke, on one hand they take begged money and weapons and the other hand they are playing tough with ISAF. If i was the Leader of Pakistan i would NOT allow drones in any circumstances, the US say they are fighting a WOT which ultimately means NOT killing innocent people but they have killed and maimed many thousands of innocent people in Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan, so Al-Qaeda and US Military are 2 sides of the same coin.
@ – LCDR Bill Speaks – I sympathize with you for having taken upon yourself the task of defending American actions, which is truly an impossibility. Here are some flaws in your reasoning.
1. The above article makes no erroneous an accusations at all… for starters look at the disguised presence of Xe Corp. (formerly known as Black Water) in Pakistan against the wishes of the people.
2. The increased drone attacks which are a violation Pakistan’s sovereignty.
3. It is naive to expect any one to believe that violation of Pakistan’s air space was a mistake and that with the most advanced navigation technology at their disposal the American pilots could not tell where Pakistan’s border was? Even much inferior air forces possess the instruments and the capability to define international boundaries. If it was an error, why did ISAF initially defend this as hot pursuit?
4. If the American pilot opened fire at the Pakistani check post without even first doing a recce and determining his target, this speaks volumes about the quality of training of USAF pilots. If on the other hand, this was the result of reckless abandon on his part, with which some of his colleagues in US ground forces hunted down innocent Afghans just for pleasure as if they were on a duck shooting expedition, that only shows the disdain they have for the local people and the respect they have for human lives.
5. The reason why the US is associated with conspiracy theories is simply because the US has lost its credibility internationally as it is known to manipulate everything to its advantage. It is because the world knows that it has been involved in committing murders of political leaders of other countries (and its own too) whom it does not like, pulling down governments that are not to its taste and waging unjustified wars and killing thousands only to promote its imperialistic designs and perpetuate its power.
6. The US holds all countries to a higher standards than it holds itself to, when it comes to human rights. It lectures every one on moral values when it shows none in terms of its own international conduct. It wants other countries to adhere to democratic values when it has turned itself into a Soviet style police state having taken away the fundamental rights of its own people. It overlooked the death of a US citizen in the flotilla incident because it occurred at the hands of Israel, who it is mortally afraid of. Had a similar incident occurred elsewhere it would have turned the world upside down.
7. How can you defend your country in the face of its behavior as a bully and a reckless adventurer? If you want the truth, stop watching Fox News and go out to listen to people around the world. America today has been voted as the most hated country in the world. Go out and see how the humanity suffers because of its actions. Visit the women and children who have been widowed and orphaned as a result drone attacks and their lives destroyed, because it treats them like trash. Do you realize how many 9/11s your country has inflicted around the world.
6. Go to thse links to get the real picture:
– http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-224605-101-us-understates-civilian-casualties-in-pakistan-makes-no-amends.html
– http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26607.htm
It is interestnig to read about china and pakistan as allies.
The chinese hate the japanese, they hate the tibetans, and also some of the chinese who are not han.
But they really love pakistanis don’t they?
They probably only hold onto pakistan because they need it, also when or if china goes into afghanistan, will pakistan support this, or will they keep the taliban to fight chinese in afghanistan?
the idea that china likes pakistanis a joke, they would wipe out the pakistanis as they consider them to be dirty pakis to be suffered until they are no longer needed.