President Donald Trump has approved the use of a firing squad to execute the convicted perpetrator of the 2009 Fort Hood mass shooting, marking a historic and deeply controversial decision.

The approval represents the first sanctioned military firing squad execution since World War II, signaling a sharp shift in how the U.S. military carries out capital punishment.

The Fort Hood attack, carried out in 2009, remains one of the deadliest mass shootings ever to occur on an American military installation, killing 13 people and wounding dozens more.

The decision to pursue execution by firing squad rather than lethal injection reflects a broader posture from the Trump administration toward more aggressive application of the death penalty.

Trump has consistently positioned himself as a strong advocate for capital punishment, particularly in cases involving military personnel or attacks on American service members and their communities.

The use of a firing squad as an execution method had largely fallen out of practice across both military and civilian justice systems in the United States in the decades following World War II.

Legal experts and civil liberties advocates are expected to challenge the method, raising questions about whether firing squad executions meet constitutional standards around cruel and unusual punishment.

Supporters of the decision argue that the severity and deliberate nature of the Fort Hood attack justifies the use of a historically significant and symbolically weighty form of military justice.

The timing of the approval, coming more than 15 years after the attack itself, reflects the lengthy legal and appellate processes that typically accompany military death penalty cases in the United States.

The case now moves toward the next phase of legal proceedings, during which the execution method and its application are likely to face intense scrutiny from courts, advocacy organizations, and members of Congress.

The decision underscores the Trump administration’s broader effort to reinvigorate federal and military capital punishment, a policy direction that has drawn both fierce support and sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.