Neo-Fascist Vladimir Zhirinovsky and His Extremely Right-Wing LDPR in Russia's Upcoming Parliamentary Elections

Zhirinovsky’s so-called Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia may, in the upcoming elections, reconstitute itself as Russia’s “third force”. The party has a well-established profile as being outspokenly nationalist, and could benefit from the rise of nationalist sentiment in Russia. Although the LDPR is part has been part of official politics for almost 20 years now, it has had continuous links to Russia’s lunatic fringe, including some openly neo-Nazi activists. While the party is outspokenly anti-Western, Zhirinovsky’s main concern is – what he calls – “the South”.

In the December 2011 State Duma elections, three to four parties will, according to polls by the Levada Center and VTsIOM, pass the 7-percent electoral threshold: United Russia (leader: Prime Minister Vladimir Putin), the Communist Party of the Russian Federation led (Gennady Zyuganov), the Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia led (Vladimir Zhirinovsky), and Fair Russia (Nikolay Levichev).

Should the election results correspond to these opinion polls, the LDPR could receive more than 10 percent of the votes. This may return the party to its previous status of being Russia’s “third force”—a political image that Zhirinovsky had, with some success, already promoted in the 1990s. The flamboyant party leader recently claimed that the LDPR would gain 25 or even 30 per cent of the votes in December, on the condition that the elections are free and fair. Whether the upcoming parliamentary elections in Russia will meet democratic standards is indeed unclear. Among others, the previous, 2007 State Duma elections were classified as unfair by the OSCE and the Council of Europe. Nevertheless, Zhirinovsky’s optimistic assessment of his party’s electoral potential is unrealistic, and reminds of his pre-electoral boasting during earlier campaigns for the State Duma.

The LDPR’s base of electoral support is located in small- and medium-size towns of Russia’s provinces, not least, in the Far East. It consists above all of young and middle-aged man with secondary education and of lower to lower-middle class background. The party’s ideological “winning formula” has been a mixture of extremely populist rhetoric, increasingly open criticism of the “party of power” (i.e. Putin’s United Russia), rabid anti-Americanism, inflammatory hate-speech, anti-Southern racism, and Russian nationalism.

Many see the LDPR as merely a “party of clowns”, in view of the eccentric behavior of Zhirinovsky. The “clowns” label also refers to the LDPR’s ambivalent oppositional stance vis-a-vis the “party of power” and Russian President—be it Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin or Dimtry Medvedev. The party appears often as an instrument of the Kremlin, rather than as an independent political phenomenon. No matter how condemnatory and fervent Zhirinovsky’s and his party members’ speeches have been, rarely has the LDPR opposed major legislative proposals drafted by the “party of power.”

Zhirinovsky’s party is also an unusual organization in as far as its name is misleading, the leadership composition unstable, and true membership number unclear. The curious name “Liberal-Democratic” is a remnant of the organization’s initial role as a “political technology” project during the early 1990s. The then pseudo-party had apparently been set up by the Soviet authorities to discredit and confuse the emerging really liberal-democratic movement of the USSR.

Today, only few of the party’s initial leaders and organizers of the 1990s—except for Zhirinovsky and his family members—aare still to be found in the LDPR’s leadership. Rather, the organization seems to go through regular purges during which most of the top posts are refilled with formerly unknown figures. Seemingly, the upper positions on the party’s parliamentary elections list are often simply sold to the highest bidder.

The number of members of the LDPR provided at the Russian Ministry of Justice’s website for 2010 was 185,573. That may, however, include many “dead souls,” i.e. names of people who are only de jure, but not in fact members of the party. The LDPR, already in the 1990s, regularly overstated its membership numbers, and may have collected signatures from politically inactive persons in order to secure registration as a party, in compliance with the restrictive rules for parties’ participation in elections introduced during Putin’s presidency.

According to Zhirinovsky, in case the LDPR gains power, some political and economic changes will be implemented immediately. The party would limit the time of governors, bureaucrats and party leaders being in office to ten years or two terms. The national republics would be abolished. Instead, Zhirinovsky proposes to create a unitary state that consists of 10-12 large gouvernements, or guberniyas. Russia should seek closer economic and political integration of the “Slavic world,” in particular, with Ukraine and Belarus, and integrate all former Soviet republics on the basis of a renewed economic and political union. The LDPR proposes the expulsion of the USA from the United Nations Security Council and to establish, within the UN, an international commission providing control over the emission of US Dollars by the Federal Reserve System.

Nevertheless, the LDPR’s anti-Westernism is only of secondary importance. At least, opposition to the West is not at the core of Zhirinovsky own world-view which is, instead, focused on “the South,” and “the Southerners” (iuzhane)—the area of his expertise as a Turkologist. The LDPR leader sees the Russian nation as a part and parcel of the world’s northern hemisphere, rather than in principal opposition to the West. At times, he has even argued for a Russian-Western-Japanese alliance that would re-divide the world into designated spheres of influence.

The LDPR, to be sure, has been highly critical of NATO’s “aggressive move to the East,” and in particular, of the idea of post-Soviet countries joining the Alliance. Moreover, the party has frequently undertaken provocative actions toward the West. For instance, in the 2007 State Duma elections, the LDPR offered the second place in its electoral list to Andrey Lugovoy, a former KGB officer suspected by the British police of having murdered Aleksandr Litvinenko, another former KGB and FSB officer who had received political asylum in the UK, in the 1990s. Zhirinovsky commented on the deadly polonium-210 poisoning of Litvinenko that “any traitor must be eliminated using any methods.” The Russian authorities refused to extradite Lugovoy. Today the British police have even less hope of interrogating him, as he is now a member of the State Duma, and enjoys immunity from prosecution. For the upcoming elections, Lugovoy has been put on the top position of the LDPR’s Irkutsk regional elections list. While this has been a demotion, as the businessman is no longer included in the party’s federal list, it still means an almost secure seat in the State Duma, and should guarantee Lugovoy’s continued immunity.

In spite of these and other similar actions, the LDPR is less fundamentally anti-Western than other Russian ultra-nationalist groups, and supports the idea of Russia’s rapprochement with the EU. In his most important 1993 political pamphlet The Last Dash to the South, Zhirinovsky instead identified “the South” as Russia’s major problem. In order to prevent instability spreading from Southern countries to Russia, he not only proposed to restore the Russian/Soviet empire. He also explicitly argued for an inclusion, in the new Russian state, of Turkey, Afghanistan and Iran. This would, such was Zhirinovsky’s argument in the 1990s, once and for all solve the issue of Russia’s centuries-old subversion by the “the Southerners,” and lastingly “sooth” the Euro-Asian continent.

While there have been indications that Zhirinovsky is still obsessed with “the South,” he has since reformulated his public political agenda, in more traditionally nationalist terms. The party’s slogans for the upcoming elections are “LDPR – For the Russians!” and “Tougher Look, Russians!” The latter is also the title of a short pamphlet published in August 2011 and debunking a presumed Western myth that Russians are “idlers and dipsomaniacs who obey different rascals without a grumble or excite senseless and bloody riots.” Quite the opposite, the pamphlet argues, the Russians “have created a great state, great science and culture.” In general, the so called “Russian question” has become the main focus of the LDPR’s electoral campaign. Although the party states that it defends the rights and interests of all the peoples of the Federation, the Russians are elevated as the state-forming nation. The LDPR’s main task is “the defense of the Russian people”, because “if they get up off their knees, it will be good for everyone, as the Russians will help all other peoples in the country, because the Russians are the kindest nation.”

In spite of Zhirinovsky’s half-Jewish family background, the LDPR is also aiming to attract anti-Semitic voters. Following the terrorist attacks in Norway in July 2011, an article published by the analytical department of the party on its web-site unequivocally suggested that the confessed terrorist Anders Breivik “belonged to a new creed of nationalists cultivated in the laboratories of Mossad”—Israel’s national intelligence agency. The motivation behind Breivik’s actions, according to the LDPR, were allegedly pro-Palestinian attitudes of those who he had killed.

Recently, the LDPR’s years of russocentric propaganda have reduced its years-long isolation within the Russian ultra-nationalist spectrum, and led to a rapprochement with the extraparliamentary extreme right. In May 2011, for instance, the party organized a round-table that addressed “the Russian question” and was held in the LDPR’s office in the State Duma. A number of well-known leaders of Russian ultra-nationalist groups were invited to this round-table. Among them were: Georgiy Borovikov of the anti-Semitic “Pamyat'” group; Dmitry Demushkin of the now banned Slavic Union—National Socialist Movement; Aleksandr Belov (alias Potkin), the founder and former leader of the also banned Movement against Illegal Immigration DPNI; Aleksandr Sevastyanov, co-founder and former leader of the National Sovereignty Party of Russia.

The list for the upcoming parliamentary elections includes, among many unknown personalities, two candidates highly respected, in the Russian ultra-nationalist scene: Valery Budanov, son of the recently murdered, notorious Colonel Yury Budanov, and Maksim Korotkov-Guliaev, Evgeniya Khasis’s former defense lawyer. In May 2011, Khasis was convicted to 18 years in prison, in connection with assisting her husband, Nikita Tikhonov, in their 2009 murder of the human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov and journalist Anastasia Baburova.

The LDPR’s interactions with the lunatic fringe has, at times, even included direct cooperation with openly neo-fascist individuals, like Viktor Yakushev, Sergei Zharikov, Eduard Limonov, Aleksey Vedenkin, Aleksei Batogov, or Nikolay Kuryanovich. Since 2004, Dmitry Rumyantsev, founder of the National Socialist Society, has been an assistant of Sergey Ivanov, member of the LDPR and State Duma. Rumyantsev is a convicted racist. In 2008, he has been given a one-year suspended sentence for hate speech while six members of his former organization were recently sentenced to life imprisonment for killing 28 “non-Russian” people.

For almost twenty years now, the LDPR has kept its status as the strongest ultra-nationalist party in Russia. It is thus well-positioned to garner support of nationalist voters. In spite of the many oddities and contradictions in the LDPR’s political history and public behavior, Zhirinovsky and Co. may—in view of the recent growth of nationalist sentiment in Russia – turn out to be among the winners of the next parliamentary elections. The party may be able to avoid suffering heavily from possible manipulations of the elections results in as far as the current Head of the Central Electoral Commission Vladimir Churov had once entered the State Duma on the LDPR ticket (without being a member of the party). Zhirinovsky’s years of continuous presence in Russian high politics has been in contradiction to many observers’ expectation of the temporary character of his political rise. The ultra-nationalist firebrand may still be good for new surprises.


This text was earlier published in: Russian Analytical Digest, no. 102 (2011), pp. 14-16.

Further Reading:

Berezovskii, V.N., 1994, ‘Vladimir Zhirinovskii kak fenomen rossiiskoi politiki’, Svobodnaia mysl’, no. 4: 96-109.

Clark, T.D., 1995, ‘The Zhirinovsky Electoral Victory: Antecedence and Aftermath’, Nationalities Papers, vol. 23, no. 4: 767-778.

Conradi, P., 1995, Schirinowski und der neue russische Nationalismus, transl. by Peter Klumbach, Düsseldorf: ECON.

Dunlop, J.B., 1994, ‘Zhirinovsky’s world’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, no. 2, April: 27-32.

Eichwede, W., ed., 1994, Der Schirinowski-Effekt: Wohin treibt Rußland, Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Forbes, M. and Fink, W., eds., Schirinowskij: Politiker – Populist – Nationalist?: Berichte und Kommentare der deutschen und internationalen Publizistik, München: Hans-Seidel-Stiftung.

Frazer, G. and Lancelle, G., 1994, Zhirinovsky. The Little Black Book: Making Sense of the Senseless, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

Gaidar, E.T., 1994, ‘Stavka na negodiaev’, Izvestiia, no. 91, 17 May: 1, 5.

Gestwa, G. and Gestwa, K., 1992, ‘Wladimir Shirinowskij: Das politische Porträt eines russischen Populisten’, Osteuropa, vol. 42: A314-A322.

Hanson, St. E., 2010, Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hirscher, G., 1994, ‘Schirinowskij und der deutsche Rechtsextremismus’, Jahrbuch Extremismus und Demokratie, vol. 6: 162-179.

Ianov, A., 1994, ‘Veimarskaia Rossiia. Chast’ vtoraia: Lidery’, Neva, no. 4: 215-259.

Ignatow, A., 1994, ‘Das ”geistige Universum” des Wladimir Shirinowskij’, Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien: Aktuelle Analysen, no. 3, 25 January.

Ignatow, A., 1994, ‘Shirinowskijs ”Sprünge”: Eine ideologische Zwischenbilanz’, Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien: Aktuelle Analysen, no. 33, 29 June.

Kartsev, V. with Bludeau, T., 1995, !Zhirinovsky!, New York: Columbia University Press.

Khopak, D., ed., 1995, Neizvestnyi Zhirinovskii: Dokumenty (1967-68, 1985-87 gg.). Moskva: Panorama.

Kibalnik, S., 1996, ‘Zhirinovsky as a Nationalist ”Kitsch Artist”’, Kennan Institute Occasional Papers, no. 264, July.

Kipp, J.W., 1994a, Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovskiy and the Liberal-Democratic Party: Statism, Nationalism, and Imperialism, January, E64, Camberley, Surrey: The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.

Kipp, J.W., 1994b, ‘The Zhirinovsky Threat’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, no. 3, May-June: 72-86.

Klepikova, E. and Solovyov, V., 1995, Zhirinovsky: The Paradoxes of Russian Fascism, transl. by Catherine A. Fitzpatrick, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Viking/Penguin Group.

Koman, A.J., 1996, ‘The Last Surge to the South: The New Enemies of Russia in the Rhetoric of Zhirinovsky’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, vol. 19: 279-327.

Laruelle, M., 2009, In the Name of the Nation: Nationalism and Politics in Contemporary Russia, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lester, J., 1994, ‘Zhirinovsky’s Liberal Democratic Party: A Profile’, Labour Focus on Eastern Europe: A Review of European Affairs, no. 47: 17-30.

Limonov, E., 1994, Limonov protiv Zhirinovskogo, Moskva: Nezavisimyi al’manakh ‘Konets veka’.

Makarkin, A., 1994, ‘Liberal’no-demokraticheskaia partiia’, Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, no. 4: 64-71.

Martelli, F., 1996, La Russia di Zhirinovskii, Bologna: il Mulino.

Morrison, J.W., 1994, Vladimir Zhirinovskiy: An Assessment of a Russian Ultra-Nationalist (=McNair Paper 30, April 1994), Washington, DC: Institute of National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.

Mosina, M. and Solodukhin, Iu., eds., 1993, Partiia Zhirinovskogo: Liberal’no-demokraticheskaia partiia, Informatsionnyi obzor. Moskva: Informatsionnoe agentstvo POSTFACTUM.

Motyl, A.J., 1994, ‘Vladimir Zhirinovsky: A Man of His Times’, The Harriman Review, vol. 7, nos. 7-9: 11-18.

Oleshuk, Iu., 1994, ‘Zhirinovskii – popytka poniat”, Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, no. 10: 77-86.

Oschlies, W., 1995, Wladimir Schirinowski: Der häßliche Russe und das post-kommunistische Osteuropa, Köln/Weimar/Wien: Böhlau.

Plekhanov, S.N., 1992, Zhirinovskii: Kto on?, Moskva: Evraziia-Nord/BIMPA.

Quinn-Judge, P., 1994, ‘Zhirinovsky vs. the Turks’, Middle East Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 2: 87-91.

Schirinowskij, W., 1994, ‘Was ich wirklich will’, München: FZ-Verlag.

Schneider, E., 1994, ‘Schirinowskij und seine Partei’, Berichte des Bundesinstituts für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien, no. 35.

Shenfield, St. D., 2001, Russian Fascism: Traditions, Tendencies, Movements, Armonk, NY: M.S. Sharpe.

Sloane, W., 1992, ‘Who’s Afraid of Vladimir Wolf?’, Moscow-Magazine, April-May: 40-47.

Spier, H., 1994, ‘A Cri-de-Coeur Against Reform: The Zhirinovsky Threat’, Institute of Jewish Affairs. Analysis, no. 1, February.

Suetnov, A., 1995, Zhirinovskii: Ocherk politicheskogo povedeniia, Moskva: Arkhiv netraditsionnoi pechati.

Talbott, S.P., 1995, ‘Vladimir Zhirinovsky and the December 1993 Elections: Current Prospects for Fascism in Russia’, Slovo (London: SSEES), vol. 8, no. 5, November: 71-86.

Timtschenko, V., 1994, Ich erwecke Rußland mit Blut – Wladimir Wolfowitsch Shirinowski, Berlin: Aufbau.

Tsygankov, A.P., 1994, ‘Zhirinovsky’s Strategy to Succeed Yeltsin, and How to Thwart It’, Demokratizatsiya, vol. 2, no. 4: 537-547.

Umland, A., 1994a, ‘Ein Gespräch mit Wladimir Schirinowski’, Die Neue Gesellschaft: Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 41, no. 2: 114-117.

Umland, A., 1994b, ‘Wladimir Shirinowskij in der russischen Politik: Einige Hintergründe des Aufstiegs der Liberal-Demokratischen Partei Rußlands’, Osteuropa, vol. 44, no. 12: 1117-1131.

Umland, A., 1995, ‘Shirinowskijs Parteipresse’, Rußland liest, no. 2: 32-33.

Umland, A., 1997, ‘The Post-Soviet Russian Extreme Right’, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 44, no. 4: 53-61.

Umland, A., 2004, ‘Zhirinovskii Before Politics: A Curriculum Vitae 1946-1989’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, vol. 17, no. 3: 425-447.

Umland, A., 2005, ‘Zhirinovskii Enters Politics: A Chronology of the Emergence of the Liberal-Democratic Party of the Soviet Union, 1990-1991’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, vol. 18, no. 1: 15-30.

Umland, A., 2006, ‘Zhirinovskii in the First Russian Republic: A Chronology of Events 1991-1993’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, vol. 19, no. 2:. 193-241.

Umland, A., 2010, ‘Zhirinovskii as a Fascist: Palingenetic Ultra-Nationalism and the Emergence of the Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia in 1992-93’, Forum für osteuropäische Ideen- und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 14, no. 2: 189-215.

Verkhovskii, A., 1994, Vladimir Zhirinovskii i Liberal’no-demokraticheskaia partiia: Informatsionnyi paket, Moskva: Panorama.

Yasman, V. and Teague, E., 1994 ‘Who is Vladimir Zhirinovskii?’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 3, no. 1: 34-35.

Zhirinovsky, V., 1996, My Struggle: The Explosive Views of Russia’s Most Controversial Political Figure, New York: Barricade Books.