Conclusions
Globalist interests, headed up by David Rockefeller and Soros, and articulated by Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, see Russia as the major obstacle to a “new world order,” as they have since the time of Stalin. China long has been seen as the means of containing Russia. Now China is a super-power in her own right, and one that – despite occasional rhetoric from public rostrums about “democracy” and “human rights” – globalist business interests welcome as being privotal to the “new world order.”
While internationalist and Israeli aims have occasionally been divergent, both are in confluence in considering China as a means of “stabilizing” Eurasia and the Middle East respectively. The US internationalists have been pursuing a pro-China agenda since before Mao assumed power, and the Israelis have always maintained a (usually covert) relationship with China. The present is the overt culmination of the largely unseen agendas of decades past.
These globalist interests do not need persuading to advocate for a Chinese role in “stabilizing” the Middle East. This role would also be useful in containing Russia in that region, just as China is also seen as the major factor in blocking Russia’s influence over Eurasia. The USA, Israel and China have all seen Russia, both in her Soviet and post-Soviet modes, as the primary adversary. A US-China-Israel alliance is more in accord with historical facts than the current Sino-Russian rapport, which could face crises scenarios over water resources, and the ancient Chinese desire for lebensraum in Russia, which is seen by the “Brzezinski Doctrine” as acceptable for the “development” (sic) of Siberia.
The option for Middle Eastern states that reject a joint Sino-US hegemony could be alignment with Russia. In Europe, the American-appeasing Sarkozy is an aberration of French politics. While Britain is likely to remain the USA’s primary ally in Europe, already there is disquiet from Germany about Europe being dragged into US military adventures that do not serve Europe’s interests. Building upon the relationship Europe is developing with Russia would be desirable, along the lines envisioned by de Gaulle.
The “Brzezinski Doctrine,” if we may call it that, could be the catalyst not for a Sino-US “new world order” but for the emergence of great geopolitical power blocs, and “vectors” of the type foreseen in particular by Russian geopolitical theoreticians who already have significance in Russian political and scholarly circles.[55]
Notes
[1] K R Bolton, “Origins of the Cold War and how Stalin Foiled a New World Order,” Foreign Policy Journal, 31 May 2010, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/05/31/origins-of-the-cold-war-how-stalin-foild-a-new-world-order
[2] K R Bolton, “Mikhail Gorbachev: Globalist Super-Star,” Foreign Policy Journal, April 3, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/04/03/mikhail-gorbachev-globalist-super-star/
[3] K R Bolton, “Russia and China: An Approaching Conflict?,” Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies, Washington DC, Vol. 34, No. 2, Summer 2009.
[4] K R Bolton, “Rivalry Over Water Resources as a Potential Cause of Conflict in Asia,” Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, Spring 2010.
[5] J Chang and J Halliday, Mao: The Unknown Story (London: Jonathan Cape, 2005), pp. 570-571.
[6] H J Salisbury, The Coming War Between Russia & China (London: Pan Books, 1969).
[7] H J Salisbury, ibid. See: K R Bolton, “Russia and China: An Approaching Conflict?,” op. cit., p. 156.
[8] K R Bolton ibid., 156.
[9] J Chang and J Halliday, op. cit., pp. 304-311. They confirm a basic contention by Senator Joseph McCarthy et al that the USA was pursuing a pro-Maoist course. See: Joseph R McCarthy (1951), America’s Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall (Boston: Western Islands, 1965); and John T Flynn (1961), While You Slept: Our Tragedy in Asia & Who Made It (Boston: Western Islands, 1965).
[10] See the chapter “Maoism Falls Flat on the World Stage,” in Chang and Halliday, ibid., pp. 587-600.
[11] It is interesting to note that Robert Blum, head of the CFR China team, was also with the Asia Society, another Rockefeller think tank that had been founded in 1956 by John D Rockefeller III. The by-line of the Society is: “Preparing Asians and Americans for a shared future.” http://www.asiasociety.org/about/mission.html (Accessed 2 March 2010).
Asia Society Trustees currently include: Charles P. Rockefeller, and John D. Rockefeller IV, a member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission and of the CFR. The chairman of the Asia Society’s Executive Committee is Richard C Holbrooke, former US Ambassador to the UN, a Trilateralist and CFR member.
[12] P Grose, Continuing The Inquiry: The Council on Foreign Relations from 1921 to 1996, “X Leads the Way.” (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2006). The entire book can be read online at: Council on Foreign Relations: http://www.cfr.org/about/history/cfr/index.html
[13] Ibid.
[14] Kissinger started his public policy career as director of the Special Studies Project of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund in 1956-57; had served as chief foreign policy adviser to Governor Nelson Rockefeller, and had been Rockefeller aide at the 1964 and 1968 Republican conventions.
[15] Grose mentions in a Note that: “Accompanying Kissinger on this momentous flight was his personal aide, Winston Lord, a former Foreign Service officer [who] became president of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1977.”
[16] Ibid.
[17] D Rockefeller, “From a China Traveller,” New York Times, August 10, 1973.
[18] For the involvement of Trilateralist Commissioners in formulating policy on China, see: Dr Antony C Sutton and Patrick M Wood, Trilateralists Over Washington Vol. 2 (Arizona: The August Corporation, 1981), pp. 63-72.
[19] N Ferguson, Colossus: The Rise & Fall of the American Empire (London: Allen Lane, 2004), p. 261.
[20] “Moscow Takes Charge of Chinese-Russian Trade Relations,” Stratfor Intelligence Brief, April 29, 2004.
[21] “Moscow Takes Charge,” ibid.
[22] European Commission, “Trade: Russia,” http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/russia/
[23] Office of the US Trade Representative, “US-Russia Trade Facts,” http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia
[24] Office of the US Trade Representative, “US-China Trade Facts,” http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/china
[25] K R Bolton, “Mikhail Gorbachev: Globalist Super-Star,” Foreign Policy Journal, April 3, 2011 http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/04/03/mikhail-gorbachev-globalist-super-star
[26] K R Bolton, ibid.
[27] Jack Kemp, et al, Russia’s Wrong Direction: What the United States Can and Should Do, Independent Task Force Report no. 57 (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2006) xi. The entire publication can be downloaded at: http://www.cfr.org/publication/9997/
[28] Jack Kemp, et al, ibid., p. 7.
[29] Son of Zbigniew, President Carter’s National Security adviser and founding director of the Trilateral Commission.
[30] K Rapoza, June 28, 2011, “Kissinger: US-China Not Competing for World Domination,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/06/28/kissinger-us-china-not-competing-for-world-domination/
[31] A Lukin, “Rusia to Reinforce the Asian Vector: Some Priorities of Russian Foreign Policy After the Crisis,” Russia in Global Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2, April June 2009, p. 86; referring to Z Brzezinski, “The Group of Two that could change the world,” in The Financial Times, January 13, 2009.
[32] H Kissinger, “The World Must Forge a New Order or Retreat to Chaos,” The Independent, January 20, 2009; cited by A Lukin, ibid.
[33] A Lukin, ibid., p. 87.
[34] A Lukin, ibid., p. 92.
[35] A Lukin, ibid., p. 93.
[36] N Gartdel’s interview with Z Brzezinski, August 10, 2008, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-gardels/brzezinski-russias-invasi_b_118029.html
[37] Z Brzezinski, “A Geostrategy for Eurasia,’ Foreign Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, Vol. 76, No. 5, September/October 1997 http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/9709brzezinski.html
[38] Ibid.
[39] Ibid.
[40] Ibid.
[41] Ibid.
[42] K R Bolton, “Russian and China: an Approaching Conflict?,” op. cit. pp. 164-165.
[43] Ibid., pp. 165-166.
[44] W Pesek, “Pop Group and Pandas – Asian Power Games Descends into Farce,” The Dominion Post, Wellington, New Zealand, B9, October 1, 2010.
[45] R Clabough, “George Soros Touts China as Leader of New World Order,” New American, November 17, 2010, http://thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/5226-george-soros-touts-china-as-leader-of-new-world-order
[46] Guang Pan, “China’s Success in the Middle East,” Middle East Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, December 1997.
[47] V Ostrovsky, By Way of Deception: The Making & Unmaking of a Mossad Officer (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1990), p. 26.
[48] Uri Dan, New York Post, March 30, 1997.
[49] New York Times, November 11, 1999, p. 1.
[50] M Levin, Washington Times, May 27, 1999, A1.
[51] K R Bolton, “Tunisian Revolt: another Soros/NED Jack-Up?,” Foreign Policy Journal, January 18, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/01/18/Tunisian-revolt-another-sorosned-jack-up
“What’s Behind the Tumult in Egypt?,” Foreign Policy Journal, February 1, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/01/whats-behind-the-tumult-in-egypt
“Post-Qaddafi Libya’: on the Globalist Road,” Foreign Policy Journal, February 26, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/26/post-qaddafi-libya-on-the-globalist-road/
“Egypt and Tunisia: Plutocracy Won,” Foreign Policy Journal, June 28, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/06/28/egypt-and-tunisia-plutocracy-won
[52] Senior fellow of the Jewish People Policy Institute and author of China and the Jewish People: old civilizations in a new era (JPPI, 2004).
[53] Fellow of the Jewish People Policy Institute.
[54] S Wald and G Afterman, “China Enters the Middle East,” Jerusalem Post, August 23, 2011, http://new.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=235150
Thanks to Maidhc Ó Cathail, editor of The Passionate Attachment, for bringing this to my attention. http://thepassionateattachment.com/2011/09/15/israel-to-convince-us-to-let-china-play-role-in-stabilizing-middle-east/
[55] K R Bolton, “An ANZAC-Indo-Russian Alliance? Geopolitical Alternatives for New Zealand and Australia,” India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, (New Delhi: Indian Council of World affairs), Vol. 66, No. 2 June 2010, pp. 183-201.
I agree with you that at the present time China and Russia have nothing in common because oil is now what makes the world go round and Russia has oil and China is it the bottom of the oil pecking order.
But the oil war has already started with the blatant attempts by US/NATO to drag Russia into war by fomenting unrest in Libya, Syria, Kosovo, placing “shield” around Russia etc .
However this week will tell whether their efforts will be successful and Russia shows its weakness by throwing away the goodwill it has generated by its principled stance in support of Libya or whether it will stand up for all those people throughout the world including America and Europe who long for a world of decency and respect where they would have the absolute right to the truth, life and ownership of property.
By the way you overlook one major country probably because it does not figure in the war scenario, India. India is in unique position because it suffered the effects of colonialism and its people are thrifty and ingenious who see no future in pointles death and destruction. Rather they see the future in the best use of technology to educate and enlighten.
It is clear that the US is not interfering in Asia,viz, avoiding selling F16s to Taiwan, staying out of the South China Sea and allowing China to have its way. These 2 countries are carving up the world into their respective hegemonies. Israel is the power behind the throne in US. Wll it do any good for the people of SEA? Time will tell. But one thing is for sure. The country that is ill treating its local Chinese will be in for a tough time.
Germany has been looking “east” since a thousands years (Teutonic knights), and France has been looking “south” since a thousands years (the Crusaders). Germany and Russia have already become de fact economic partners. France via North Africa is trying to keep control of “Afrique francophonie” and worries about U.S. Africom muscleing in! It is true, Russia is in a complicated position and nervous about ALL neighbours, but certainly aware that it is the permanent U.S. and British strategy to dismember more from its territories. Most of Latin America may now finally become independent from the U.S., and the U.S.’s geostrategic attention on China, Russia and the Near East – is seen as a fortunate diversion. China is aware that American Jews hold a unique spell over U.S. geopolitical strategies – and that no genuine triple-alliance U.S.-Israel – China would ever exist, but rather a combine of U.S.-Israel converging on China. China will be remain the reserved “Middle Kingdom” and avoid involvements which history has shown them as transitory.
Geopolitical realignments today shows an unhealthy competition among states for power. This is where the UN should step in.
But in reneigueing in its stated purpose recently the UN is being judged by its refusal to protect all humanity’s right to the truth, life and ownership of property which have formed the bedrock of ordered societies for thousands of years. The UN sanctioned attack on Libya which has been based on lies, murder and robbery shows that the UN has lost all credibility and is only relevant in that it has to be rendered powerless which is what has already happened in the cavalier attitude to it by the US and NATO, and anyone who still believes they should go along with its decrees is very foolish indeed.
So as the UN is irrelevant we now see a scramble by the nation states because they have realised that history has taught us that once an aggressor starts a war it has to keep going until it is defeated.
M. Bolton u should write Science Fiction Books. This will never happen. It is very unrealistic, not to say totally brainless.
WRONG!!!
1. Jacob Schiff, a Jewish Zionist international Banker, funded the Soviet revolution.
2. Stalin’s USSR was built and armed by the USA throughout up till the 1970s, See:
2.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqM-CMoa9M
“The Best Enemies Money Can Buy – Prof. Antony C. Sutton”
2.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
“Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job (Complete)”
3. The Holodomor was a Genocide in order to reduce the christian presence and power: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
4. The recent generation Oligarchs in Russia are MI6-backed Zionists.
5. China’s rise to power has been enabled by Germany.
First of all the article only focuses on China-US relations and China-Russia relations despite the title.
I would be convinced if the situation wouldn’t be that on a broad scale European countries and the USA tend to be blocked together and practically the European foreign policy coordinations failures show that it is a more diversified picture since instead of the USA perhaps the term anglo-saxon countries might be more accurate. At the same time I do not see the clear relations between Europe and Arabia. In terms of the EuroRussian relations it is mostly true that despite differences they are economically haevily dependent on each other which is always the best of alliances.
In my view while we might talk about Europe as a whole in a title in terms a foreign policy unfortunately it is impossible to do so. Just look at the case of Palestine, no common ground exists on that, great example for Euro-Arab relations too.
Last, but not least do not forget that China is heavily investing in Africa and thus creating strong relations with muslim countries economically.
Lol what are you smoking dude?
Triple lol. What are you smoking dude ?