Souring of Arab and Western Relations
Israel has existed for much of its history since 1948 by maintaining the fiction that it is the only reliable state in the Middle East that is Western-orientated amidst a sea of states hostile to “Western values.” The dichotomy is misleading. Israel was for the first years of its existence largely a center of Marxist agitation in the Middle East, and even before the declaration of Israel in 1948, Zionist settlers in Palestine were conveyers of the Marxist creed that has never found fertile ground in any form among the Arabs.[20] Israel is neither pro-Western nor anti-Western; it is pro-Israel, no more and no less. Israel has always played a duplicitous game diplomatically. For example, it has for decades maintained a largely covert relationship with Red China to the point of contravening US restrictions on weapons transfers.[21] As for the souring of relations between the West and the Arabs, this is of a particularly treacherous nature, and is a festering sore that the West has the responsibility to heal.
The origins of this perfidy are in World War I at a time when the Arabs were under Ottoman rule. Zionist hopes for gaining Palestine seemed at the time to rest with Turkey and Germany, while Arab independence rested with the vanquishing of those powers. In return for Arab support the Allies led them to believe that independent states would be granted. In 1915 Sheriff Hussein of Mecca, speaking for the Arab world, approached Sir Henry McMahon, British Commissioner in Cairo, offering support for the war against the Turks if Britain would pledge support for Arab independence. Correspondence between the two during 1915 and early 1916 culminated in McMahon’s guarantee of British support for independence within the requested boundaries.[22] However, in the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 between Britain and France, ‘parts’ of Palestine would be under international administration upon agreement among the Allies and with the Arabs represented by the Sheriff of Mecca.[23] This Anglo-French agreement already had the seeds of duplicity as it gave the two powers control over Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Transjordan, reneging on the commitment that had already been given by the British to Sheriff Hussein, and without his knowledge. Lord Curzon remarked that the boundary lines drawn up by the Sykes-Picot agreement indicated “gross ignorance” and he assumed that it was never believed the agreement would be implemented. Prime Minister Lloyd George considered the Sykes-Picot agreement foolish and dishonorable, but it was nonetheless implemented after the Allied victory.[24]
In 1916 the war was going badly for the Allies, and the only hope was to persuade the USA to enter. Sykes approached the War Cabinet with the suggestion that if Palestine was offered as a Jewish homeland, then Jewish sympathy could be mobilized for the Allied cause, and the USA might be induced to join the conflict. US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis used his influence to induce President Wilson to adopt an interventionist policy.[25] In return for Zionist support the British reneged on their promises to the Arabs and secretly promised to support a Jewish homeland in Palestine; a guarantee that became known as the Balfour Declaration. The machinations were confirmed by Lloyd George to the Palestine Royal Commission in 1937, the report of which states that George told the commission that if the Allies supported a Jewish homeland in Palestine the Zionist leaders had promised to “rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the allied cause. They kept their word.”[26] Never mind that the war could have been ended sooner and American lives would not have been sacrificed.
The Arabs, fighting in the field for the Allies, were unaware of the new arrangements that had been reached via the Picot-Sykes agreement and the Balfour Declaration. When the Bolsheviks came to power in Russia, they revealed these secret agreements, but the Arabs continued to fight, due to Allied assurances that neither Sykes-Picot nor the Balfour Declaration ‘would undermine the promises that had been made to them. Among the numerous reiterations of Allied support for the Arab cause, The Anglo-French Declaration of 9 November 1918 most plainly stated that France and Britain would support setting up “indigenous governments and administrations in Syria (which included Palestine) and Mesopotamia (Iraq).”[27] With such assurances, the Arab fight against the Turks was of crucial importance to the Allies. These treacherous maneuvers laid the foundations for the festering Middle East sore that has been aggravated ever since by the slavish attitude the USA and its allies have displayed towards Israel.
Target
This background of Western duplicity towards the Arabs, along with the Zionist wire-pulling, is directly relevant to the present ‘clash of civilizations’, the ‘war on terrorism’, and the Breivik atrocity as a manifestation of these. Leading up to the Breivik massacre of Labour Party youth, the neo-cons had been agitating against the Labour Government that was indicating it would adopt a more strident policy towards Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. In particular, the youth wing of the party was lobbying for a Norwegian economic boycott of Israel. Joseph Klein, posting on Horowitz’s Front Page Mag two days before Breivik’s rampage, described the Norwegian Government as “Quislings” and called them the “the latest example of Norwegian collaboration with the enemies of the Jews.” Is the language any less inflammatory than Breivik’s European Declaration of Independence that the news media and their pundits are scrutinizing for signs of “right-wing extremism”? Klein stated: “Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere declared during a press conference this week, alongside Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, that ‘Norway believes it is perfectly legitimate for the Palestinian president to turn to the United Nations’ to seek recognition of an independent Palestinian state.”[28] An agreement was signed giving Palestine’s representative in Norway full ambassadorial status. Stoere also appealed for financial help for Palestinians. Other transgressions by the Norwegians, according to Klein, include a Labour Member of Parliament stating that Jews exaggerate the Holocaust; socialist leader Kristin Halvorsen having participated in an anti-Israel demonstration while serving as minister of finance; the Norwegian Government’s divesting of funds from two Israeli companies in 2010; the claim that “anti-Semitism is alive and well” among the Norwegian political, cultural and academic elite; pro-Hitler sentiments expressed by Muslim students in Norway, and more. Klein stated that part of the reason for this rise in anti-Semitism is because of the toleration of multiculturalism by the Norwegian Establishment. He ends by writing: “Norway is repeating its Quisling treachery of the Nazi era, this time in league with a growing radical Muslim population. And once again the Jews are the victims.”[29]
A Hebrew website, Rotter, states that two days before the massacre, the leader of the Norwegian Labour Party Youth, Eskil Pederson, said in an interview that it was time to end dialogue with Israel and undertake tough measures, including an economic boycott by Norway. The youth at the Labour camp aimed to lobby their party for a boycott. The site describes the Labour youth camp:
48 hours before the shooting attack on the island, the youth met the Norwegian Foreign Minister. Some called for a boycott of Israel.
On Wednesday, the second day of the ruling party youth conference on the island, the youth holiday camp discussed with the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahar Store, and ordered him to support Palestine. About 48 hours later, many of them were killed, Anders Bering Breivik launched a shooting crazy.
Labour Youth Movement demanded recognition of a Palestinian state, and foreign minister have said that the Palestinians get their own state. ‘The occupation must end, the wall should be demolished and it has to happen now,’ said Ghar Store to the audience. Some of the youngsters in the camp waving a placard with the word ‘boycott Israel’. Demanded an economic embargo on Israel. Summer camp ended in the massacre.
Leader, Askyl Pedersen, said that young people require imposition of an economic embargo on Israel. ‘Our policy on the Middle East is to be more active and demand recognition of Palestine. There is also the peace process back on track,’ said Pedersen. The Foreign Minister agreed with him, but said that a boycott is not the right approach: ‘This will make dialogue become a monologue.’ [30]
The media pundits have waxed indignant about the ‘extremists’ who have posted on ‘far Right’ websites in support of Breivik’s actions, Dr Matthew Goodwin, writing for the Telegraph:
Make no mistake: Breivik has already become a heroic figure for sections of the ultra far right, much in the same way Timothy McVeigh became a hero for sections of the militia movement in the United States. In Britain, his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant and anti-establishment ideas are easily found in a far-right scene that has become fragmented and chaotic.[31]
Yet it does not seem to have been pointed out that Breivik’s action has generated enthusiasm in Israel. Some of the posts on the Israeli Hebrew website Rotter, state:
• Because I waited with this response until after it became clear that there was indeed a conference which explicitly called for the Boycott of Israel. I am very happy and pleased about the massacre that took place in the camp of the enemies of Israel.
• Hitler Youth members killed in the bombing of Germany were also innocent. Let us all cry about the terrible evil bombardment carried out by the Allies…We have a bunch of haters of Israel meeting in a country that hates Israel in a conference that endorses the boycott. So it’s not okay, not nice, really a tragedy for families, and we condemn the act itself, but to cry about it? Come on. We Jews are not Christians. In the Jewish religion there is no obligation to love or mourn for the enemy.
• It’s stupidity and malice not [to] want the death of those who call to boycott Israel.
• I have no sympathy for those who want the destruction of Israel.
• Not looking for excuses but it’s not our mourning. Like not mourning at the time the 50 thousand dead in the bombing of Dresden.
• May all our enemies be paid with such speed.
• At least now they have more important things to worry about than Israel.
• Maybe we can arrange a badge of honor on behalf of the International Headquarters for Saving People and the Land.[32]
It seems that Breivik’s actions made a lot of “sense” from a pro-Zionist perspective, but the motives have nothing to do with ideologies of the “far Right,” and much to do with supporting Israel.
Conclusion
The “clash of civilizations” now taking place in the name of the “war on terrorism” is a second Cold War foisted upon the world in order to achieve American global hegemony. With the eclipse of the first Cold War following the implosion of the Soviet bloc, the USA required another world bogeyman to justify its global adventures. The same ideologues undertook a new Cold War, this time against Islam, using the same type of sloganeering. Islamophobia is the new anti-Sovietism, and is serving the same interests. Trotskyites and other Marxists disaffected by the rise of Stalin created the ideological foundations for the Cold War. That is where the so-called “neo-conservative” movement has its origins.[33] Anti-Soviet rhetoric has been altered to apply to the new “menace of radical Islam.” The slogan now is “Islamofascism,” coined by neo-con ideologue Stephen Schwarz, director of the Center for Islamic Pluralism. Schwartz’s background, like most of the neo-con founders, is as a Trotskyite, and he reiterated to National Review that he would defend the legacy of Trotsky to his “last breath.”[34]
Relations between the West and the Arab states were evolving past the very old antagonisms until Zionist machinations entered the scene during World War I. It is not too late to correct the distorted relationships that have occurred between the West and the Arabs, and then an amicable solution can be found to the problems of Muslim immigration. As for Breivik, he is a product of the forces that are inimical to the traditional West. He is no more a “conservative” than the neo-cons who sprang from the bowels of Trotskyism, plutocracy, Zionism and the CIA during the first Cold War.
Notes
[1] Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (London: Pluto Press, 1994).
[2] Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (London: Pluto Press, 1999).
[3] A Breivik, 2083: A Declaration of European Independence (London, 2011) p. 1372.
[4] A Breivik, ibid., p. 1215.
[5] “Wall of Lies,” Front Page, 25 February 2011, http://frontpagemag.com/2011/02/25/ucla-daily-bruin-prints-centers-wall-of-lies/
[6] A Breivik, op. cit., p. 677.
[7] “Muhammed cartoon gallery,” Human Events, 2 February 2006, http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=12146
[8] C Bollyn, “Understanding the Roots of the Anti-Muslim Cartoon Scandal,” American Free Press, Vol. 6, no. 8, 20 February 2006. See: “War Without End,” http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2006/02/07/anti-muslim-cartoons-tied-to-neo-con-fanatic.php
[9] D Pipes, “Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism,” cited by C Bollyn, ibid.
[10] D Pipes, “Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism,” danielpipes.org, http://www.danielpipes.org/3360/cartoons-and-islamic-imperialism
Originally published in the New York Sun, 7 February 2006.
[11] D Pipes, danielpipes.com 24 July 2011, http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2009/12/why-did-nidal-hasan-read-the-middle-east-forum
[13] Michelle Boorstein, “Once Considered Anti-Islam, Senior Scholar says he’s now in the Middle,” The Washington Post, 18 August 2010. http://www.danielpipes.org/8777/in-the-middle
[14] http://mondoweiss.net/2009/09/the-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my.html
http://deisraellobby.blogspot.com/2010/08/british-zionists-join-far-right.html
[15] A Breivik, op. cit., p. 1240.
[16] G Atzmon, “British Zionists Join Far Right Organisation to Promote Islamophobia and Racism in UK,” 17 August 2010, http://deisraellobby.blogspot.com/2010/08/british-zionists-join-far-right.html
[17] Bat Ye’or, The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam, (New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1985).
[18] Bat Ye’or, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, (New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005).
[19] B Ye’or, “Eurabaria: The Road to Munich,” National Review, 9 October 2002, http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-yeor100902.asp
[20] K R Bolton, “The Red Face of Israel’,”Foreign Policy Journal, 2 August 2, 2010, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/02/the-red-face-of-israel
[21] K R Bolton, “Chinese TV Series Lauds Israel: The Alliance Between China and Zionism,” Foreign Policy Journal, 18 August, 2010, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/18/chinese-tv-series-lauds-israel-the-alliance-between-china-and-zionism
[22] Sami Hadawi, Bitter Harvest: Palestine 1914-79 (New York: Caravan Books, 1979), p. 11.
[23] S Hadawi, ibid., p. 12.
[24] S Hadawi, ibid., pp. 12-13.
[25] S Hadawi, ibid., p. 13.
[26] Palestine Royal Commission Report cited by S Hadawi, ibid., p. 14.
[27] S Hadawi, ibid., p. 15.
[28] J Klein, “The Quislings of Norway,” Front Page Mag, 20 July, 2011, http://frontpagemag.com/2011/07/20/the-quislings-of-norway/
[29] J Klein, ibid.
[31] M Goodwin, “Norway Killer: many within Far-Right share Anders Breivik’s ideas,” The Telegraph, London, 26 July 2011, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658417/Norway-killer-many-within-far-right-share-Anders-Breiviks-ideas.html
[33] K R Bolton, “America’s ‘World Revolution’: Neo-Trotskyist Foundations of US Foreign Policy’,,”Foreign Policy Journal, 3 May 2010, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/05/03/americas-world-revolution-neo-trotskyist-foundations-of-u-s-foreign-policy
[34] S Schwartz, “Trotskycons?,” National Review, 11 June 2003: http://faceoff.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-schwartz061103.asp
Nice try. His “support” for Israel was only a tiny element of a much larger culturally-Christian and conservative worldview. You’re implying that it’s to the contrary, that it is actually a central element. His writings do not support it at all.
He also wrote that India and Serbia are justified in fighting against Islamic militants. Why not change the above line to “India supporter massacres youngsters at Labour camp in Norway”, or even “Serbia supporter massacres youngsters at Labour camp in Norway.”
Because you’re hateful, perhaps as hateful as Breivik.
The only ‘world view’ the mass murderer has expounded and enthusiastically espoused is the Zionist one. His ‘manifesto’ contains almost 400 laudatory references each to Jews and to Israel. The Serbia and India reference is a one-off ‘aside’, as is his very half-hearted, almost jocose, reference to his Christianity, which, he says, is such that he has no particular relationship with Christ. I cannot see a Christian ‘world view’ in that. No, James: Dr Bolton is nothing like hateful, except perhaps to people like you, who go for the throat of anyone who does not bow to Zionism. (Or are you one of the thousands being paid to attack as meanly as possible anyone who dares voice a view that does not flatter Zionism?)
Clear view on terrorist Breivik. Terrorist! A man who killed 76 people! Personally I think he is a product of “Israel” and it’s so clear that he is a clash of civilization himself.
so long as islam uses threats against those that criticize it and it continues to demand special treatment along with its violence and intolerance towards non muslims and women, people will continue to fight it. tho i do not agree with Breiviks methods i empathize with his frustration towards multiculturalist elites who continue their path of cultural suicide. u dont move to europe to change its culture, u assimilate and integrate with it. islam does the opposite, i fear Breivik is an example of things to come. people r fed up with islam and its incompatability with democracy and freedom of speech.
I think there is a little bit of Superman about Breivik, being in two places and “accomplishing” so much in such a short space of time.
Cospiracy theorists, where are you?
Right here, Edward!
Have you read this absurd ‘manifesto’? It quite obviously is not written by a 32-year-old Norwegian for whom English is a second language. Not once is there so much as a slip in idiom or mark of ‘foreign accent’. Sometimes, the spelling is English, other times American. My strong impression is that someone hurriedly pulled out everything, from a dedicated useful-propaganda data base or two, that maligns Muslims and Islam. And this was just ‘background’ for the hair-raising call to arms against Western countries’ governments that begins after p.900.
Sometimes, this ‘manifesto’ is almost comical: A Zionist plan to defeat at once the anti-Israel, pro-Muslim European ‘right wing’ and the ‘cultural Marxists’ comes up in decidedly Jewish-English structures; and I must wonder how Breivik managed that:
‘The NS are generally pro Muslim and anti Jewish. They should know that we will defend our right wing Jewish and other non-Muslim minority groups, who have fought by our side with our lives as they will do the same for us. It is still too early to tell how the situation will develop. A relationship is always reciprocal so we, the pro-multiethnicity and pro-Israel/Jewish factions, do in fact expect future support from all non-Muslim right wing minority groups and indirect support from the Israeli right wing. We will rely on their support in order to be able to dominate the European right wing for the future -because if we fail, they will lose their only interest groups and allies’ (pp.1127 – 1128).
The enormity of the crimes of this Christian Zionist with his extreme rightist agenda and his well-planned and systematic slaughter of so many young people baffles many of us in Norway and around the world. Norway is a free and democratic country where people can express their views. There is a high level of tolerance and acceptance of people of European and non-European origin who have different religions, modes of living and social ways. These things make Norway a brilliant example of how a just socio-political system should be.
At the same time, I am also aware of the dangers and pressures that non-European communities in Norway and the rest of the western world could have faced if this mass murderer were not a blond native Norwegian but a non-European. We know how the non-white communities, especially Muslims, were treated throughout Europe and North America after the 9/11. So, no matter who was responsible for the 9/11, all Muslim communities had to face terror and insults at the hands of the white people. I had seen and also experienced myself how the Muslims were subjected to much humiliation in Norway at the hands of some people.
“These things make Norway a brilliant example of how a just socio-political system should be.”
Maybe we should judge by results. It seems that these days the results produced by Norway have been less than edifying with their involvement in Afghanstan, Iraq, Libya and now at home.
But maybe Afghanstan, Iraq, Libya are too far away to be worried about the their pain an suffering.
Edward, you are right when you mention Norway’s involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Norway has been a loyal ally and a Yes-man to American global politics. All the Norwegian governments after the Second World War have been staunch supporters of the policies of the Zionist State of Israel. Norway’s pro-Israel and pro-Zionist parties like Christian People’s Party and the ultra right-wing Progress Party have been supporters of Israeli wars, its colonisation of the occupied territories, its brutal suppression of the people of Palestine, and the massacres of the Palestinians whenever they took place. Along with some fundamental Christians and ordinary believing Christians, they supported Israeli invasion of Gaza and the massacre in 2009 under the oft-repeated mantra or the notorious deceptive gimmick that ‘Israel has a right to defend itself itself’. And full stop; that’s the end of the matter.
While Norway has a subservient role in the foreign policy matters due to dominant influence of the hegemon and its NATO membership, the welfare and egalitarian system within the borders of Norway needs praise and emulation. In fact that was the point I had made in my first comment. However, what an individual or a group can do or what sort of carnage Breivik resorted to is something no one can really control. Norway is an open and democratic state and its people are mostly non-aggressive and peaceful citizens.
Your reply raises the question of individual responsibilty versus state responsibility. Where does the responsibility deficit we clearly see in modern Western society lie?
Maybe we we need to return the most basic principles of the right to the truth, life and the ownership of property.
Edward, the question you raise about individual responsibility versus state responsibility is an interesting one that can lead to a lengthy academic discussion. Possibly, you have some ideas to put forth. In that case, I think, many readers of FPJ will be glad if you state your views. It is only after seeing what you say, will I be able to respond if I thought what I say is of some use.
Nasir: Re: Your comment below on individual versus state responsibility. As I have said, maybe we we need to return to the basic and absolute indivdual right to the truth, life and the ownership of property.
You will probably recognise these in their negative form “you shall not bear false witness against your neighbour”, you shall not kill” and you shall not steal”.
Before you say that these rights cannot be absolute who has the authority to lie, to kill or to steal. No one. It follows then that anyone who denies any of these rights to others must be held accountable for their actions whether they act as an individual or as a servant of the state. Note that it was common practice to hold a coroner’s enquiry into every violent death even in wartime until the Americans came along and refused even to count he people they killed in Iraq.
A good example of where state responsibility becomes individual responsibility is given in the account of Jesus before Pilate. Pilate was deemed to be responsible for his actions but the greater sin was apportioned to those who handed Jesus over to Pilate. This indicates that we cannot absolve ourselves from the actions of the government we elect.
In summary then there are three basic and absolute rights which we are all individually responsible for whatever our station in life. These rights cannot under any circumstances be set aside with impunity.
Jon Benjamin, Board of Deputies chief executive, said: “The EDL’s supposed ‘support’ for Israel is empty and duplicitous. It is built on a foundation of Islamophobia and hatred which we reject entirely.
So…. there are some sick minded Jews who join the EDL and just a few days ago understood that the EDL are Nazis and even crazy “Roberta Moore” left after a year as she understood who they are.
On the other side, you get Sick minded Jews, like “GILAD ATZMON” and hundred of other jews who hate Israel and will sell their soul to the devil for thier hate, will join all Israel and jew haters in order to gain their hate satisfaction.
BUT JEWS LIKE ATZMON, WILL NEVER GET TO THEIR SENSES AND CONTINUE THEIR SICK HATE FOR THE JEWS AND ISRAEL, AS THOSE PSYCHO’S DON’T HAVE ANY LIMIT AND ARE DOOMED.
For all the hypocrites……….
Who is Israel ENEMY……….
Islam, not the Palestinians, they never been the enemy’s as they were a tool for the Arab Muslim Countries, that wanted the Jews pushed to the SEA.
So give me a break, Muslim’s around the world, see the Jew’s as Israel partners and as so see the Jew’s as their Enemy’s
So stop playing stupid, show me Muslim’s who are not against Jews…….. (maybe you can count them).
More Jews are less anti Muslims then vise versa, even in Israel the peace movement is much bigger then on the other side.
So stop playing this Hypocrite stupid game.
Right Wing knows it, as you do and are trying to benefit.
From there to assume your stupid assumption, to blame Israel and the jews, is the Muslim hate for the jews propaganda and nothing more.;
On the same level see the admiration letter sent today from the Grand Wizard KKK David Duke to Gilad Atzmon an avid anti Jew.
Letter to the Courageous Former Israeli Gilad Atzmon
7/29/2011
By David Duke
http://www.davidduke.com/general/letter-to-the-courageous-former-israeli-gilad-atzmon_24245.html
“As you have pointed out so well with the Jewish corruption of the so-called Anti-Zionist Movement, please understand that for these radical Jews, destruction of European heritage and loyalty is a weapon they use to divide and conquer. Multiculturalism is a weapon for Jewish supremacism. Immigration is means to divide and conquer ,and they are already using its bad effects to garner support for Israel from unsuspecting European people.
It is my task to warn the world of this Trojan Horse before there are many more Breiviks and the immense damage and evil they cause our people.
Best to You,
David Duke”
Those Two Racist anti Jewish, can form the new Anti Jewish Movement.
So Robert, I too can send you a letter addressing you as the illegitimate son of Hitler. Does that make you one?
The zios are one with all the right-wingers across the world. Now why else are there so many Israeli flags waving at their demostrations? And it isn’t only the EDL members waving them. Take a look at the ChristianZio wingnuts like Haggee and Huckabee. What do you see waving behind them? Why it’s the izzy flag!
Now, what did Breivik say in his Manifesto: “So let us fight together with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionista, against all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists? Et tu Robert, Barry, Josh?
Kass
Well If you sent a letter to me, then…. what the hell.
But if the GRAND WIZARD OF THE KKK David Duke sends you a letter.
Well if you don’t see the Difference.
I am not surprized by your comment.
I think Kass dose not know who David Duke is……..
I guess he thinks is just another commenter.
Neither the islamic hate crimes that has gone on for well over 1000 years during ottoman and mogul colonial savagery nor the current ruling elite have had any viable or practical solution to riots, rapes and robbery we witness in countries like India, Thailand, Nigeria, Philippines, Sudan, etc where infidels are either being killed or paying infidel-tax or being converted exactly as prescribed in kuran. India is affected by frequent and pervasive blasts in trains, markets, and temples besides riots for Saddam’s hanging, Rev Falwell’s remarks, danish cartoons – all events totally unrelated to Indians. Why???
We keep filling the pockets of islamists in the name of aid to fakistan, bangladesh, somalia, egypt, etc over and above what citizens of directly affected countries listed in prior para – pay as infidel tax. Where is the end?! What is the solution??! Thanks and Regards,
Zionist propagandists are past masters in the art of deception, manipulation of world public opinion, calucated misleading digressions of the goals they purue but they never explain what they stand for. But we understand why they don’t say what they stand for and what their plans are. At least, unlike some people, I am under no illusions. I know what Zionists are doing and whszt is their strategy to achieve their goals.
The Zionist curse in the Middle East and on the rest of the world is more dangerous than the Nazi curse. The Nazi racist ideology and political agenda led to the some of the great crimes against humanity in the last century.
Who could have ever imagined that Zionists will be the virtual inheritors of Nazism backed by the United States of America? But in reality that is what has happened and they have succeeded in where the Nazis failed. That is a historical and political fact that keeps on unravelling before all of us. Some see it, many don’t.
Even the greatest military and political power in the history of the world, the United States of America, is subject to the diktat and power of the Zionists. What that means for the world is something that sane people should start to think and tell us what to do.
This guy is somehow connected to israel as no human would do what he did!!! It will all come out, all the crimes of the zionist and humanity will rise up and rid the planet to restore peace!!!!
Norway was in the gunsights of Israel for a number of reasons. Three significant ones are 1. It’s billion dollar oil fund divestments in Israeli companies. 2. The announcement that is will cast a UN vote for Palestinian statehood. 3. The termination of it’s alliance with NATO in the Libya adventure. I don’t think anything about Anders Breivik from the studio photos of him in costume to the convenient Facebook page(s) to the slickly produced video and manifesto are the work of a lone singleminded anti-jihadist. Michael Leeden, a behind-the-scenes American neo-conservative Zionist pundit with a checkered career as a psyops “soldier” in Italy is supposed to have once said, “take a small country and slap it against the wall, just to show we mean business.” Even if the quote isn’t true it reflects the Zionist mindset and Zionism was happy with Norway on August 22.
The Oslo killer was a violent neoconservative extremist. I’d use the phrase neoconservative fundamentalist, but that would imply all neoconservatives are fundamentally violent killers and that would be just as wrong as the term Muslim Fundamentalist to describe violent Muslim extremists.
Pls write an article about “Why all other people from Non-islamic religious backgrounds hate Moslems”. It’s the truth. Thanks.
There are definite threads of white nationalism in his ideology. I wrote an op-ed about this for a Norwegian paper. With Google translate you will be able to get the picture:
http://www.dagbladet.no/2011/08/08/kultur/debatt/kronikk/nasjonalisme/breivik/17594748/
Ben T, I am pleased to see your article in Dagbladet. I also live in Oslo, and I am glad that some Norwegian journalists, from time to time, can write a good article as yours in such a case. That gives us some hope, no doubt.
However, I am also aware that in a small country like Norway, where the ‘native’ people are mostly humane and caring, we have serious societal problems. But with a humane attitude we can confront what are immigration problems from eastern Europe and the rest of the world. Such matters can’t be dealt with by us as individuals (as some suggest, Mr. Breivik is one extreme of that outlook, but only the government can form policies in this regard. We have a democratic political system in Norway, which in my view, can be a model for the rest of the world. And I mean that literally as far Norway’s internal matters (not the foreign policy!) are concerned. That is my sincere view about Norway and its humane and egalitarian system.
— Peace and Justice Post.
I agree!
Oh, I get it.
If Jews are not on his hit list, it’s because we are bad people!!!!