Subscribe to FPJ’s free weekly newsletter

Bush Convicted of War Crimes in Absentia

by Yvonne Ridley

May 12, 2012

Kuala Lumpur — It’s official; George W Bush is a war criminal.

In what is the first ever conviction of its kind anywhere in the world, the former US President and seven key members of his administration were yesterday (Fri) found guilty of war crimes.

Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisers Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo were tried in absentia in Malaysia.

The trial held in Kuala Lumpur heard harrowing witness accounts from victims of torture who suffered at the hands of US soldiers and contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They included testimony from British man Moazzam Begg, an ex-Guantanamo detainee and Iraqi woman Jameelah Abbas Hameedi who was tortured in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison.

At the end of the week-long hearing, the five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered guilty verdicts against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their key legal advisors who were all convicted as war criminals for torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment.

Full transcripts of the charges, witness statements and other relevant material will now be sent to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission is also asking that the names of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Yoo, Bybee, Addington and Haynes be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals for public record.

The tribunal is the initiative of Malaysia’s retired Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who staunchly opposed the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

He sat through the entire hearing as it took personal statements and testimonies of three witnesses namely Abbas Abid, Moazzam Begg and Jameelah Hameedi. The tribunal also heard two other Statutory Declarations of Iraqi citizen Ali Shalal and Rahul Ahmed, another British citizen.

After the guilty verdict reached by five senior judges was delivered, Mahathir Mohamad said: “Powerful countries are getting away with murder.”

War crimes expert and lawyer Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law in America, was part of the prosecution team.

After the case he said: “This is the first conviction of these people anywhere in the world.”

While the hearing is regarded by some as being purely symbolic, human rights activist Boyle said he was hopeful that Bush and Co could soon find themselves facing similar trials elsewhere in the world.

“We tried three times to get Bush in Canada but were thwarted by the Canadian Government, then we scared Bush out of going to Switzerland. The Spanish attempt failed because of the government there and the same happened in Germany.”

Boyle then referenced the Nuremberg Charter which was used as the format for the tribunal when asked about the credibility of the initiative in Malaysia. He quoted: “Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any person in execution of such a plan.”

The US is subject to customary international law and to the Principles of the Nuremberg Charter said Boyle who also believes the week-long trial was “almost certainly” being monitored closely by both Pentagon and White House officials.

Professor Gurdial Singh Nijar, who headed the prosecution said: “The tribunal was very careful to adhere scrupulously to the regulations drawn up by the Nuremberg courts and the International Criminal Courts”.

He added that he was optimistic the tribunal would be followed up elsewhere in the world where “countries have a duty to try war criminals” and he cited the case of the former Chilean dictator Augustine Pinochet who was arrested in Britain to be extradited to Spain on charges of war crimes.

“Pinochet was only eight years out of his presidency when that happened.”

The Pinochet case was the first time that several European judges applied the principle of universal jurisdiction, declaring themselves competent to judge crimes committed by former heads of state, despite local amnesty laws.

Throughout the week the tribunal was packed with legal experts and law students as witnesses gave testimony and then cross examination by the defence led by lawyer Jason Kay Kit Leon.

 The court heard how

  • Abbas Abid, a 48-year-old engineer from Fallujah in Iraq had his fingernails removed by pliers.
  • Ali Shalal was attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from a wall.
  • Moazzam Begg was beaten, hooded and put in solitary confinement.
  • Jameelah was stripped and humiliated, and was used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter.

The witnesses also detailed how they have residual injuries till today.

Moazzam Begg, now working as a director for the London-based human rights group Cageprisoners said he was delighted with the verdict, but added: “When people talk about Nuremberg you have to remember those tried were all prosecuted after the war.

“Right now Guantanamo is still open, people are still being held there and are still being tortured there.”

In response to questions about the difference between the Bush and Obama Administrations, he added: “If President Bush was the President of extra-judicial torture then US President Barak Obama is the President of extra judicial killing through drone strikes. Our work has only just begun.”

The prosecution case rested on proving how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials – all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.

According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses exposed a sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel and dehumanising course of conduct against them.

These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict the worst possible pain and suffering, said lawyers.

The president of the tribunal Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin, found that the prosecution had established beyond a “reasonable doubt that the accused persons, former President George Bush and his co-conspirators engaged in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to commit the crimes of Torture and War Crimes, including and not limited to a common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

President Lamin told a packed courtroom: “As a tribunal of conscience, the Tribunal is fully aware that its verdict is merely declaratory in nature. The tribunal has no power of enforcement, no power to impose any custodial sentence on any one or more of the 8 convicted persons. What we can do, under Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the Tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.

“The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicised accordingly.

“The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions if any of these Accused persons may enter their jurisdictions”.

About the Author

Yvonne Ridley

Homepage
British journalist Yvonne Ridley is a patron of Cageprisoners as well as being the European president of the International Muslim Women's Union and the Vice President of the European Muslim League. More...

164 Responses to Bush Convicted of War Crimes in Absentia

  1. Robert

    May 18, 2012 at 2:11 pm

    Bush’s list of crimes is very long, but I don’t what’s worse: all that he did or supporting it to this day.

  2. J. Sen

    May 18, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    This article is just terribly written. It represents itself as a journalistic report and as such it should hold itself up to some standard.

    To write in one of your opening paragraphs “tried in absentia in Malaysia” and not make clear that this wasn’t in any court of law is terrible reporting.

    The KLWCC is not recognized by any Malaysian court. This was a symbolic trial with no real legal implications for any of the accused.

    Ridley only uses the word “symbolic” in her 13th paragraph and prefaces it with the words “regarded by some”. That’s just shoddy journalism.

    As a Malaysian and a KLite who works in media, I just cannot believe how badly this article was written.

    I in no way shape or form side with the accused but come on, are the victories so small that “British journalist Yvonne Ridley (who) is the European President of the International Muslim Women’s Union as well as being a patron of Cageprisoners” has to do such a terrible job in representing the facts?

    You do not bury or distort the lead. You most certainly do not imply that an entire country has tried and convicted, in absentia, a former President of the United States. You need to note when a trial is a symbolic one and when it did not take place in any court of law.

    • James Luxley

      May 26, 2012 at 5:07 pm

      Justice is justice without an official justice system. You don’t need an official justice system and court to find anyone guilty.

    • Chris Glowacki

      June 2, 2012 at 9:44 am

      Hmmm… Media misrepresenting the facts? What an odd occurence, hope it doesn’t happen too often

  3. Judson Witham

    May 20, 2012 at 3:22 am

    The actions of the United States to investigate and hunt down the Bastards that attacked NYC and Washington, DC and that were responsible for the many deaths on that horrid day was Fully and Absolutely supported by me. Then I saw the Invasion of Iraq and then the invasion of Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan DID NOT as Nations have anything to do with 9/11. Bush’s preemptive war doctrine is called Naked Aggression and the tens of thousands of dead and 100s of thousands casualties that will live with their pain and scars for life. In the Cowboy Guns Ship reactionary zeal that Dubbya exhibited as they say in Texas He Crapped in his Hat. My Father was a US Navy Fighter Pilot in WW II and my Family has it’s fair share of Naval, Marine, Air Force and Combat Veterans. I am a Minister and I know this, The Court that tried this case reached the correct decision. How do I know, had any Country attacked the USA because outlaws or terrorists NOT under direct orders from our leaders that had done similar acts of Terror would have had no right to bomb any of our Cities and certainly not invaded the USA. I love my Country BUT I am not willing to lie for anyone that would refer to Shock and Awe in the bombing of any Nation that had NO WMD and was NOT responsible for 9/11. Murder is Murder and Unjust War is Unjust War. As a Man I need NO FORMAL training to be a Juror at a Murder Trial and as a Man I do NOT need anyone telling me I must Ignore the facts. The facts are very simple, Iraq’s people DID NOT ATTACK US either did Afghanistan’s People. Bush and Cheney are Guilty as this Court Has Found. In the Bible David with a sling and a stone vanquished a Giant Monster and David was Justified. The Court in this case as far as the facts reveal was Justified. Powell Knows as does Stormin Norman … There were NO WMD’s ask Wesley Clark see what He Says. God Saw the entire thing fellas and so did the rest of this World. The USA needs to remember God Does Not Bless Murders of innocent people NO MATTER WHAT Blindness they suffer from. I suggest a full and complete re-investigation by INDEPENDENT Examiners of the 9/11 Terror. If God is ever again to Bless The USA … The TRUTH will be the reason why. Two Wrongs have never made a single right and what Bush and Cheney and Company did was NOT the Right Thing.

    • Jarda

      May 22, 2012 at 11:13 pm

      I’d like to point out that no one has ever presented any better proof about the WTC and Pentagon attacks other than what would be good enough for a bad spy sitcom. So as for the “bastards” who did it we are left in a fog. We are to believe what Fox News says but it might be all a different story which we might learn many years from now after some documents will be declassified or probably rather never. Knowing a bit about the long history of US lies and propaganda I’m inclined to take any official statement with very long tweezers and rubber gloves.

    • Andrew Ross

      June 1, 2012 at 7:17 am

      Have you ever watched loose change? The documentary covering 9/11 has enough evidence to make it clear to any educated individual that the story reported by the media was fabricated. 9/11 was most likely an inside job. Applying basic sciences such as chemistry and physics to the scenario eliminates almost entirely what they were reporting to be true. 9/11 was an inside job.

  4. Ehtesham Ali

    May 26, 2012 at 8:13 am

    US bad relations with many countries & nations doesn’t mean that its people don’t want good relations with other countries but its the government policies which have caused a dis-rest in the world.