Don't Miss a Thing!
Sign up for FPJ Weekly, a free digest the week's stories delivered straight to your inbox.

You can unsubscribe at any time, and FPJ values your privacy. Your email will never be sold or shared with third parties.

Supplemental Blog on Arizona Shootings

Because my blog prompted by the Arizona shootings has attracted many comments pro and con, and more recently has been the object of a more selective public attack on me personally, I thought it appropriate to post a supplementary blog with the purpose of clarifying my actual position and re-focusing attention on the plight and suffering of the Palestinian people being held in captivity. In the background, are crucial issues of free speech, fairness in public discourse, and responsible media treatment of sensitive and controversial affairs of state.

Both the UN Secretary General and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations harshly criticized some remarks in my personal blog that mentioned the 9/11 attacks. They referred to the views expressed there as ‘despicable and deeply offensive,’ ‘noxious, ‘inflammatory,’ and ‘preposterous.’ Their comments were apparently made in response to a letter written to the UN Secretary General by the head of UN Monitor, a Geneva-based highly partisan NGO, that called misleading attention to this passage in the blog. Ambassador Rice called for my dismissal from my unpaid post as an independent Special Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council with a mandate to report upon the Israeli observance of “human rights in Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.”

For anyone who read the blog post in its entirety, it should be plain that the reference to the 9/11 issues is both restrained and tangential. What is stressed in the blog is the importance of carefully examining evidence before drawing conclusions about political and legal responsibility for highly sensitive public acts, and the importance for the serenity of the society of achieving closure in a responsible manner. I never endorsed doubts about the official version of 9/11 beyond indicating what anyone who has objectively examined the controversy knows — that there remain certain gaps in the official explanation that give rise to an array of conspiratorial explanations, and that the 9/11 Commission unfortunately did not put these concerns to rest. My plea was intended to encourage addressing these gaps in a credible manner, nothing more, nothing less. I certainly meant no disrespect toward the collective memory of 9/11 in the country and elsewhere. On the contrary, my intention was to encourage an investigation that might finally achieve closure with respect to doubts that remain prevalent among important sectors of the public, including among some 9/11 families.

What seems apparent from this incident, which is itself disturbing, is that any acknowledgement of doubt about the validity of the official version of the 9/11 events, while enjoying the legal protection of free speech, is denied the political and moral protection that are essential if an atmosphere of free speech worthy of a democracy is to be maintained. When high officials can brand someone who raises some doubts in the most cautious language as ‘an enemy of the people,’ then there are either things to hide or a defensive fury that is out of all proportion to the provocation. To seek further inquiry into the unanswered questions about 9/11 is surely not an unreasonable position

What is dismaying to me is that neither the office of the Secretary General nor the U.S. Mission to the United Nation made any effort to contact me to seek clarification of my remarks on these issues that are not connected with my UN role prior to making their insulting criticisms damaging to my reputation. I would think that as a representative of the UN and a citizen of the United States, I am at least entitled to this minimal courtesy, and more substantially, that whatever criticisms are made are based on what I said rather than on a manifestly inflammatory letter written by the UN Monitor, that has made a habit of publicly attacking me in consistently irresponsible and untruthful ways, presumably with the intention of diverting attention from my criticisms of Israel’s occupation policies in the Palestinian territories. It is always more tempting to shoot the messenger than heed the message. A similar tactic, what I call ‘the politics of deflection’ was deployed over a year ago in a shabby attempt to discredit the distinguished South African jurist, Richard Goldstone, a person of impeccable credentials as an international public servant. The intention was again to avoid a proper focus upon the devastating findings and recommendations of the Goldstone Report submitted to the United Nations after conducting a scrupulous inquiry into the allegations of violation of law associated with the Israeli attacks on Gaza between December 27, 2008 and January 18, 2009.

I remain determined to report as fully and honestly as possible about the massive human rights violations confronting Palestinians who have now lived without rights under occupation for more than 43 years, and to do my best not to let such personal attacks impair my capacity to carry out the assignment that I was invited to perform by the UN.

What the United States Government, the Secretary-General and the media should be focused on is the ongoing, widespread and systematic violation of Palestinians’ human rights by Israel. Only since the beginning of 2011, at least four Palestinian civilians have been killed by Israeli forces and more than 33 others have been injured. This is in addition to the expansion of settlements, home demolitions, forced evictions and displacement of Palestinian families, revocation of residency permits and forced transfers, particularly devastating in East Jerusalem, detention and mistreatment of over 6000 Palestinians, including children, as well as the illegal blockade of Gaza. My forthcoming report to the Human Rights Council addresses these and other severe ongoing violations of Palestinian rights by Israel.


About the Author

Richard Falk

Homepage
Richard Falk
Richard Falk is an international law and international relations scholar who taught at Princeton University for forty years. Since 2002 he has lived in Santa Barbara, California, and taught at the local campus of the University of California in Global and International Studies and since 2005 chaired the Board of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. He is the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967. 
  • William M. Dix

    Mr. Falk:

    It might behoove you to read Popular Mechanics article debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories before making a fool of yourself on this issue and involving yourself in an area you are ill qualified to make judgment as to the validity of the conspiracy theories surrounding the events of 9/11.

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

    • http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/ Truth Excavator

      You are the fool, not Mr. Falk.

      • William M. Dix

        Really? So far 9/11 conspiracy theorists capacity for ignoring all evidence contradicting their beliefs is only surpassed by those pushing Young Earth creationist theory. The next thing you will be informing me is that Jared Loughner did not shoot congresswoman Giffords.

        • http://www.jeremyrhammond.com Jeremy R. Hammond

          I’m not interested in rhetoric. We could discuss the facts if you’d like.

    • http://911review.com ResearchGuy

      Three variants of a critique of Popular Mechanics’ ridiculous propaganda can be found at http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html. Most people cannot read those critiques without understanding that the writers and editors of that Popular Mechanics piece are deliberately participating in the cover-up of the mass murder of 3000 Americans. I hope someone sues me for writing this. I would welcome the chance to mop the floor with them in court.

      It’s funny how just about everybody who cites the Popular Mechanics article fails to mention these quite prominent critiques, or any of the specific criticisms documented there, much less provide any defenses against them. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of people like Mr. Dix? They actually lost this debate a long time ago, but since we are not having this debate in court, there is no end point for the debate, and no cost to them for continuing to spew their nonsense and insults.

    • Phillip Block

      Dr. Mr. Dix,
      It might likewise behoove you to read Dr. David Ray Griffin’s “Debunking 9/11 Debunking” (Olive Branch Press, 2008), a rebuttal and analysis that most independent scientists would say simply unmasks Popular Mechanics’ defense of the official conspiracy as the flimsy bit of prevarication/propaganda that it really is.

  • http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com james ha

    anyone with eyes can see for themself that the wtc was destroyed by explosions and did not really collapse as the official fairytale claimed. why do you think they never show it on TV? think about it, if 19 muslims with boxcutters really had done it, it would be shown on TV night and day in order to keep the stupid american populace in support of the war of terror.
    anyway, falk, kudos for actually speaking out in an official capacity, but you obviously know the truth, so why don’t you really speak out – come on man, call a spade a spade!
    wtcdemolition.blogspot.com

  • http://www.global-platonic-theater.com Dan Noel

    Falk is correct. He simply stated the obvious, mildly, gently, and tangentialy: the official 9/11 narrative features gaping holes that beg to be plugged, starting with this one: http://www.meetup.com/OC-911-Truth/pages/911_Truth%3A_a_Simple_Matter_of_Epistemology/

    What is most intriguing is the rabid opposition by very powerful leaders and organizations to find the answer to simple questions related to 9/11, many of which have ramifications way beyond the specifics of 9/11.

    Love,

  • Frigga Karl

    “It is always more tempting to shoot the messenger than heed the message”
    This is the exact and repeated behaviour of the zionists to discredit anybody honestly and clearly speaking out of the reality in Palestine, of the inherent and never ending human rights abuses of the israeli ancient colonial fashion occupation terror , its constant lethal attacks against vulnerable and unprotected Palestinian people, just to reach demography goals . Susan Abulhawha was also shooted as a messenger from Bernard Henry Levy the french pop star of philosophy, because of her book “Mornings in Jenin” a historic fiction work. Here we are, always forced to explain and defend honest works. And we witness every day the israeli slaughter. This israeli madness must come to an end. Neighbor states are in rubble and ashes. Our individual responsability must stop this israeli destruction work.