Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions

UN Security Council resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of its Charter obligations and international law

Following is a list of United Nations Security Council resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.

The United Nations Security Council Chamber in New York
The United Nations Security Council Chamber in New York

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 298 (Sep. 25, 1971) – Recalls resolutions 252 and 267 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254 concerning Israel’s measures to annex Jerusalem, reaffirms “the principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, notes “the non-compliance by Israel” of the recalled resolutions, deplores Israel’s failure to respect the resolutions, confirms that Israel’s actions “are totally invalid”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind its measures and take “no further steps in the occupied section of Jerusalem” to change the status of the city.

Res. 313 (Feb. 28, 1972) – “Demands that Israel immediately desist and refrain from any ground and air military action against Lebanon and forthwith withdraw all its military forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 316 (Jun. 26, 1972) – Deplores “the tragic loss of life resulting from all acts of violence”, expresses grave concern “at Israel’s failure to comply with Security Council resolutions” 262, 270, 280, 285, and 313 “calling on Israel to desist forthwith from any violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon”, calls on Israel to abide by the resolutions, and condemns “the repeated attacks of Israeli forces on Lebanese territory and population in violation of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and Israel’s obligations thereunder”.

Res. 317 (Jul. 21, 1972) – Notes resolution 316, deplores the fact that Israel had not yet released “Syrian and Lebanese military and security personnel abducted by Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory” on June 21, 1972, and calls on Israel to release the prisoners.

Res. 332 (Apr. 21, 1972) – “Condemns the repeated military attacks conducted by Israel against Lebanon and Israel’s violation of Lebanon’s territorial integrity and sovereignty” in violation of the U.N. Charter, the armistice agreement, and cease-fire resolutions.

Res. 337 (Aug. 15, 1973) – Notes “the violation of Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” by Israel “and the hijacking, by the Israeli air force, of a Lebanese civilian airliner on lease to Iraqi Airways”, expresses grave concern “that such an act carried out by Israel, a Member of the United Nations, constitutes a serious interference with international civil aviation and a violation of the Charter of the United Nations”, recognizes “that such an act could jeopardize the lives and safety of passengers and crew and violates the provisions of international conventions safeguarding civil aviation”, condemns Israel “for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and for the forcible diversion and seizure by the Israeli air force of a Lebanese airliner from Lebanon’s air space”, and considers that Israel’s actions constitute a violation of the armistice agreement, cease-fire resolutions, the U.N. Charter, “the international conventions on civil aviation and the principles of international law and morality”.

Res. 347 (Apr. 24, 1974) – “Condemns Israel’s violation of Lebanon’s territorial integrity and sovereignty and calls once more on the Government of Israel to refrain from further military actions and threats against Lebanon”, and calls on Israel “to release and return to Lebanon the abducted Lebanese civilians”.

Res. 425 (Mar. 19, 1978) – “Calls for strict respect for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized boundaries”, and “Calls upon Israel immediately to cease its military action against Lebanese territorial integrity and withdraw forthwith its forces from all Lebanese territory”.

Res. 427 (May 3, 1978) – “Calls upon Israel to complete its withdrawal from all Lebanese territory without any further delay”.

Res. 446 (Mar. 22, 1979) – Affirms “once more that the Fourth Geneva Convention … is applicable to the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, “Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East”, “Strongly deplores the failure of Israel to abide by” resolutions 237, 252, and 298, and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, and calls on Israel “as the occupying Power” to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention, to “rescind its previous measures and to desist from any action which would result in changing the legal status and geographical nature and materially affecting the demographic composition of the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, and, in particular, not to transfer parts of its own civilian population into the occupied Arab territories”.

Res. 450 (Jun. 14, 1979) – “Strongly deplores acts of violence against Lebanon that have led to the displacement of civilians, including Palestinians, and brought about destruction and loss of innocent lives”, and calls on Israel to cease actions against Lebanon, “in particular its incursions into Lebanon and the assistance it continues to lend to irresponsible armed groups”.

Res. 452 (Jul. 20, 1979) – Strongly deplores “the lack of co-operation of Israel” with the Security Council Commission “established under resolution 446 (1979) to examine the situation relating to settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem”, considers “that the policy of Israel in establishing settlements in the occupied Arab territories has no legal validity and constitutes a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention”, expresses deep concern at Israel’s policy of constructing settlements “in the occupied Arab territories, including Jerusalem, and its consequences for the local Arab and Palestinian population”, and calls on Israel to cease such activities.

Res. 465 (Mar. 1, 1980) – Strongly deplores Israel’s refusal to co-operate with the Security Council Commission, regrets Israel’s “formal rejection of” resolutions 446 and 452, deplores Israel’s decision “to officially support Israeli settlement” in the occupied territories, expresses deep concern over Israel’s settlement policy “and its consequences for the local Arab and Palestinian population”, “Strongly deplores the decision of Israel to prohibit the free travel” of the mayor of Hebron “to appear before the Security Council”, and “Determines that all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel’s policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention”.

Res. 467 (Apr. 24, 1980) – “Condemns all actions contrary to” resolutions 425, 426, 427, 434, 444, 450, and 459 “and, in particular, strongly deplores” any “violation of Lebanese sovereignty and territorial integrity” and “Israel’s military intervention into Lebanon”.

Res. 468 (May 8, 1980) – Expresses deep concern “at the expulsion by the Israeli military occupation authorities of the Mayors of Hebron and Halhoul and the Sharia Judge of Hebron” and “Calls upon the Government of Israel as occupying Power to rescind these illegal measures and facilitate the immediate return of the expelled Palestinian leaders so that they can resume the functions for which they were elected and appointed”.

Res. 469 (May 20, 1980) – Recalls the Fourth Geneva Convention “and in particular article 1, which reads ‘The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances,’ and article 49, which reads ‘Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from the occupied territory to the territory of the occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive”, “Strongly deplores the failure of the Government of Israel to implement Security Council resolution 468”, “Calls again upon the Government of Israel, as occupying Power, to rescind the illegal measures taken by the Israeli military occupation authorities in expelling the Mayors of Hebron and Halhoul and the Sharis Judge of Hebron, and to facilitate the immediate return of the expelled Palestinian leaders, so that they can resume their functions for which they were elected and appointed”.

Res. 471 (Jun. 5, 1980) – Recalls “once again” the Fourth Geneva Convention, “and in particular article 27, which reads, ‘ Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons… They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof…’”, reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention “to the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, expresses deep concern “that the Jewish settlers in the occupied Arab territories are allowed to carry arms, thus enabling them to perpetrate crimes against the civilian Arab population”, “Condemns the assassination attempts against the Mayors of Nablus, Ramallah and Al Bireh and calls for the immediate apprehension and prosecution of the perpetrators of these crimes”, “Expresses deep concern that Israel, as the occupying Power, has failed to provide adequate protection to the civilian population in the occupied territories in conformity with the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War”, calls on Israel “to provide the victims with adequate compensation for the damage suffered as a result of these crimes”, “Calls again upon the government of Israel to respect and to comply with the provisions of” the Fourth Geneva Convention and “the relevant resolutions of the Security Council”, “Calls once again upon all States not to provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connexion [sic] with settlements in the occupied territories”, “Reaffirms the overriding necessity to end the prolonged occupation of Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”.

Res. 476 (Jun. 30, 1980) – Reaffirms that “the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible”, deplores “the persistence of Israel, in changing the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure and the status of the Holy City of Jerusalem”, expresses grave concern “over the legislative steps initiated in the Israeli Knesset with the aim of changing the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the overriding necessity to end the prolonged occupation of Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, “Strongly deplores the continued refusal of Israel, the occupying Power, to comply with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly”, “Reconfirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which purport to later the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention”, “Reiterates that all such measures … are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council”, and “Urgently calls on Israel, the occupying Power, to abide by this and previous Security Council resolutions and to desist forthwith from persisting in the policy and measures affecting the character and status of the Holy city of Jerusalem”.

Res. 478 (Aug. 20, 1980) – Reaffirms “again that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible”, notes “that Israel has not complied with resolution 476”, “Censures in the strongest terms the enactment by Israel of the ‘basic law’ on Jerusalem and the refusal to comply with relevant Security Council resolutions”, “Affirms that the enactment of the ‘basic law’ by Israel constitutes a violation of international law”, “Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purport to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and in particular the recent ‘basic law’ on Jerusalem, are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith”.

Res. 484 (Dec. 19, 1980) – Expresses “grave concern at the expulsion by Israel of the Mayor of Hebron and the Mayor of Halhoul”, “Reaffirms the applicability of” the Fourth Geneva Convention “to all the Arab territories occupied by Israel in 1967”, “Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to adhere to the provisions of the Convention”, and “Declares it imperative that the Mayor of Hebron and the Mayor of Halhoul be enabled to return to their homes and resume their responsibilities”.

Res. 487 (Jun. 19, 1981) – Expresses full awareness “of the fact that Iraq has been a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons since it came into force in 1970, that in accordance with that Treaty Iraq has accepted IAEA safeguards on all its nuclear activities, and that the Agency has testified that these safeguards have been satisfactorily applied to date”, notes “furthermore that Israel has not adhered to the non-proliferation Treaty”, expresses deep concern “about the danger to international peace and security created by the premeditated Israeli air attack on Iraqi nuclear installations on 7 June 1981, which could at any time explode the situation in the area, with grave consequences for the vital interests of all States”, “Strongly condemns the military attack by Israel in clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct”, “Further considers that the said attack constitutes a serious threat to the entire IAEA safeguards regime which is the foundation of the non-proliferation Treaty”, “Fully recognizes the inalienable sovereign right of Iraq, and all other States, especially the developing countries, to establish programmes of technological and nuclear development to develop their economy and industry for peaceful purposes in accordance with their present and future needs and consistent with the internationally accepted objectives of preventing nuclear-weapons proliferation”, and “Calls upon Israel urgently to place its nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards”.

Res. 497 (Dec. 17, 1981) – Reaffirms “that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, the principles of international law, and relevant Security Council resolutions”, “Decides that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is null and void and without international legal effect”, “Demands that Israel, the occupying Power, should rescind forthwith its decision”, and “Determines that all the provisions of the” Fourth Geneva Convention “continue to apply to the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since June 1967”.

Res. 501 (Feb. 25, 1982) – Reaffirms resolution 425 calling upon Israel to cease its military action against Lebanon.

Res. 509 ( Jun. 6, 1982) – “Demands that Israel withdraw all its military forces forthwith and unconditionally to the internationally recognized boundaries of Lebanon”.

Res. 515 (Jul. 29, 1982) – “Demands that the Government of Israel lift immediately the blockade of the city of Beirut in order to permit the dispatch of supplies to meet the urgent needs of the civilian population and allow the distribution of aid provided by United Nations agencies and by non-governmental organizations, particularly the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)”.

Res. 517 (Aug. 4, 1982) – Expresses deep shock and alarm “by the deplorable consequences of the Israeli invasion of Beirut on 3 August 1982”, “Confirms once again its demand for an immediate cease-fire and withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon”, and “Censures Israel for its failure to comply with” resolutions 508, 509, 512, 513, 515, and 516.

Res. 518 (Aug. 12, 1982) – “Demands that Israel and all parties to the conflict observe strictly the terms of Security Council resolutions relevant to the immediate cessation of all military activities within Lebanon and, particularly, in and around Beirut”, “Demands the immediate lifting of all restrictions on the city of Beirut in order to permit the free entry of supplies to meet the urgent needs of the civilian population in Beirut”.

Res. 520 (Sep. 17, 1982) – “Condemns the recent Israeli incursions into Beirut in violation of the cease-fire agreements and of Security Council resolutions”,  and “Demands an immediate return to the positions occupied by Israel before” September 15, 1982 “as a first step towards the full implementation of Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 521 (Sep. 19, 1982) – “Condemns the criminal massacre of Palestinian civilians in Beirut” in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps.

Res. 573 (Oct. 4, 1985) – “Condemns vigorously the act of armed aggression perpetrated by Israel against Tunisian territory in flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations, international law and norms of conduct”.

Res. 592 (Dec. 8, 1986) – Reaffirms that the Fourth Geneva Convention “is applicable to the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, and “Strongly deplores the opening of fire by the Israeli army resulting in the death and the wounding of defenceless students”.

Res. 605 (Dec. 22, 1987) – “Strongly deplores those policies and practices of Israel, the occupying Power, which violate the human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories, and in particular the opening of fire by the Israeli army, resulting in the killing and wounding of defenceless Palestinian civilians”, and reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention “to the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”.

Res. 607 (Jan. 5, 1988) – Expresses “grave concern over the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories”, notes “the decision of Israel, the occupying Power, to ‘continue the deportation’ of Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories”, “Reaffirms once again” the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention “to Palestinian and other Arab territories, occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, “Calls upon Israel to refrain from deporting any Palestinian civilians from the occupied territories”, and “Strongly requests Israel, the occupying Power, to abide by its obligations arising from the Convention”.

Res. 608 (Jan. 14, 1988) – Reaffirms resolution 607, expresses “deep regret that Israel, the occupying Power, has, in defiance of that resolution, deported Palestinian civilians”, and “Calls upon Israel to rescind the order to deport Palestinian civilians and to ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied Palestinian territories of those already deported”.

Res. 611 (Apr. 25, 1988) – Notes “with concern that the aggression perpetrated” by Israelis on April 16, 1988 “in the locality of Sidi Bou Said”, Tunisia, “has caused loss of human life, particularly the assassination of Mr. Khalil El Wazir”, and “Condemns vigorously the aggression perpetrated … against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Tunisia in flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations, international law and norms of conduct”.

Res. 636 (Jul. 6, 1989) – Reaffirms resolutions 607 and 608, notes “that Israel, the occupying Power, has once again, in defiance of those resolutions, deported eight Palestinian civilians on 29 June 1989”, Expresses deep regret “the continuing deportation by Israel, the occupying Power, of Palestinian civilians”, “Calls upon Israel to ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied Palestinian territories of those deported and to desist forthwith from deporting any other Palestinian civilians”, and “Reaffirms that” the Fourth Geneva Convention “is applicable to the Palestinian territories, occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, and to other occupied Arab territories”.

Res. 641 (Aug. 30, 1989) – Reaffirms resolutions 607, 608, and 636, notes that Israel “has once again, in defiance of those resolutions, deported five Palestinian civilians on 27 August 1989”, and “Deplores the continuing deportation by Israel, the occupying Power, of Palestinian civilians”.

Res. 672 (Oct. 12, 1990) – “Expresses alarm at the violence which took place” on October 8, 1990, “at the Al Haram al Shareef and other Holy Places of Jerusalem resulting in over twenty Palestinian deaths and to the injury of more than one hundred and fifty people, including Palestinian civilians and innocent worshippers”, “Condemns especially the acts of violence committed by the Israeli forces resulting in injuries and loss of human life”, and “Requests, in connection with the decision of the Secretary-General to send a mission to the region, which the Council welcomes, that he submit a report to it before the end of October 1990 containing his findings and conclusions and that he use as appropriate all the resources of the United Nations in the region in carrying out the mission.”

Res. 673 (Oct. 24, 1990) – “Deplores the refusal of the Israeli Government to receive the mission of the Secretary-General to the region”, and “Urges the Israeli Government to reconsider its decision and insists that it comply fully with resolution 672 (1990) and to permit the mission of the Secretary-General to proceed in keeping with its purpose”.

Res. 681 (Dec. 20, 1990) – Reaffirms “the obligations of Member States under the United Nations Charter”, reaffirms “also the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, expresses alarm “by the decision of the Government of Israel to deport four Palestinians from the occupied territories in contravention of its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention” in contravention to resolutions 607, 608, 636, and 641, “Expresses its grave concern over the rejection by Israel of Security Council resolutions” 672 and 673, and “Deplores the decision by the Government of Israel, the occupying Power, to resume deportations of Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories”.

Res. 694 (May 24, 1991) – Reaffirms resolution 681 calling on Israel to respect the Fourth Geneva Convention, notes “with deep concern and consternation that Israel has, in violation of its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, and acting in opposition to relevant Security Council resolutions, and to the detriment of efforts to achieve a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, deported four Palestinian civilians” on May 18, 1991, “Declares that the action of the Israeli authorities of deporting four Palestinians … is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention …, which is applicable to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, and “Deplores this action and reiterates that Israel, the occupying Power, refrain from deporting any Palestinian civilian from the occupied territories and ensure the safe and immediate return of all those deported”.

Res. 726 (Jan. 6, 1992) – Recalls resolutions 607, 608, 636, 641, and 694 calling on Israel to respect the Fourth Geneva Convention, “Strongly condemns the decision of Israel, the occupying Power, to resume deportations of Palestinian civilians”, “Reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention … to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, and “requests Israel, the occupying Power, to ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied territories of all those deported”.

Res. 799 (Dec. 18, 1992) – Reaffirms resolutions 607, 608, 636, 641, 681, 694, and 726 calling on Israel to respect the Fourth Geneva Convention, notes “with deep concern that Israel, the occupying Power, in contravention of its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention …, deported to Lebanon” on December 17, 1992 “hundreds of Palestinian civilians from the territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jersualem”, “Strongly condemns the action taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to deport hundreds of Palestinian civilians, and expresses its firm opposition to any such deportation by Israel”, “Reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention … to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, and affirms that deportation of civilians constitutes a contravention of its obligations under the Convention”, and “Demands that Israel, the occupying Power, ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied territories of all those deported”.

Res. 904 (Mar. 18, 1994) – Expresses shock at “the appalling massacre committed against Palestinian worshippers in the Mosque of Ibrahim in Hebron” on February 25, 1994 by Jewish settler Baruch Goldstein “during the holy month of Ramadan”, expresses grave concern with “the consequent Palestinian casualties in the occupied Palestinian territory as a result of the massacre, which underlines the need to provide protection and security for the Palestinian people”, notes “the condemnation of this massacre by the entire international community”, “Strongly condemns the massacre in Hebron and its aftermath which took the lives of more than fifty Palestinian civilians and injured several hundred others”, and “Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to continue to take and implement measures, including, inter alia, confiscation of arms, with the aim of preventing illegal acts of violence by Israeli settlers”.

Res. 1073 (Sep. 28, 1996) – Expresses “deep concern about the tragic events in Jerusalem and the areas of Nablus, Ramallah, Bethlehem and the Gaza Strip, which resulted in a high number of deaths and injuries among the Palestinian civilians, and concerned also about the clashes between the Israeli army and the Palestinian police and the casualties on both sides”, and “Calls for the safety and protection for Palestinian civilians to be ensured”.

Res. 1322 (Oct. 7, 2000) – Expresses deep concern “by the tragic events that have taken place” since September 28, 2000 “that have led to numerous deaths and injuries, mostly among Palestinians”, “Deplores the provocation carried out at Al-Haram Al-Sharif in Jerusalem” on September 28, 2000 “and the subsequent violence there and at other Holy Places, as well as in other areas throughout the territories occupied by Israel since 1967, resulting in over 80 Palestinian deaths and many other casualties”, “Condemns acts of violence, especially the excessive use of force against Palestinians, resulting in injury and loss of human life”, and “Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and its responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention”.

Res. 1402 (Mar. 30, 2002) – Expresses grave concern “at the further deterioration of the situation, including the recent suicide bombings in Israel and the military attack against the headquarters of the president of the Palestinian Authority”, “Calls upon both parties to move immediately to a meaningful cease-fire” and “calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah”.

Res. 1403 (Apr. 4, 2002) – Expresses grave concern “at the further deterioration of the situation on the ground” and “Demands the implementation of its resolution 1402 (2002) without delay”.

Res. 1405 (Apr. 19, 2002) – Expresses concern for “the dire humanitarian situation of the Palestinian civilian population, in particular reports from the Jenin refugee camp of an unknown number of deaths and destruction”, calls for “the lifting of restrictions imposed, in particular in Jenin, on the operations of humanitarian organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross and United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East”, and “Emphasizes the urgency of access of medical and humanitarian organizations to the Palestinian civilian population”.

Res. 1435 (Sep. 24, 2002) – Expresses grave concern “at the reoccupation of the headquarters of the President of the Palestinian Authority in the City of Ramallah that took place” on September 19, 2002, demands “its immediate end”, expresses alarm “at the reoccupation of Palestinian cities as well as the severe restrictions imposed on the freedom of movement of persons and goods, and gravely concerned at the humanitarian crisis being faced by the Palestinian people”, reiterates “the need for respect in all circumstances of international humanitarian law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War”, “Demands that Israel immediately cease measures in and around Ramallah including the destruction of Palestinian civilian and security infrastructure”, and “Demands also the expeditious withdrawal of the Israeli occupying forces from Palestinian cities towards the return to the positions held prior to September 2000”.

Res. 1544 (May 19, 2004) – Reaffirms resolutions 242, 338, 446, 1322, 1397, 1402, 1405, 1435, and 1515, reiterates “the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War”, calls “on Israel to address its security needs within the boundaries of international law”, expresses “grave concern at the continued deterioration of the situation on the ground in the territory occupied by Israel since 1967”, condemns “the killing of Palestinian civilians that took place in the Rafah area”, expresses grave concern “by the recent demolition of homes committed by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Rafah refugee camp”, reaffirms “its support for the Road Map, endorsed in resolution 1515”, “Calls on Israel to respect its obligations under international humanitarian law, and insists, in particular, on its obligation not to undertake demolition of homes contrary to that law”, and “Calls on both parties to immediately implement their obligations under the Road Map”.

Res. 1701 (Aug. 11, 2006) – Expresses “its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel” that “has already caused hundreds of deaths and injuries” and “extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons”, and “Calls for a full cessation of hostilities” including “the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations”.

Res. 1860 (Jan. 8, 2009) – Expresses “grave concern at the escalation of violence and the deterioration of the situation, in particular the resulting heavy civilian casualties since the refusal to extend the period of calm”, expresses “grave concern also at the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza”, “calls for an immediate, durable and fully respected ceasefire, leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza”, “Calls for the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment”, and “Condemns all violence and hostilities directed against civilians and all acts of terrorism”.

Join Liberty Classroom today and get 3 FREE books!

Jeremy R. Hammond

HomepageFacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+
Jeremy R. Hammond is an award-winning political analyst, editor and publisher of Foreign Policy Journal, and author. His new book is Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Read the first chapter FREE at ObstacleToPeace.com! 

Comments are encouraged, but please respect the rules. Click here for terms of use.

  • Doru

    Wonderful compilation , Kudos !

    Now , let’s all send a copy to our Presidents/Prime Ministers/Members of Congress-MPs , and ask them :
    ‘ As a country we can be judge by the friends and people we support . Do you support a rogue country with such a UN record ? If yes , you must explain since your support would make you and our Country an Accessory to Crime , a criminal offence under International and Local Law ‘ .

    Just do it ! Please .

    Thank you ,

    Doru
    Canada

    • Maurício Mmp

      Doru, good to see that from Canada. I lived there for some years and am pretty shocked with Harper´s unconditional support of Israel. The Crime Minister, as he is now being called, even refused to ask for a 2-state solution. I hope you all go to the streets and storm Ottawa with massive protests!!

    • Patrick Greene

      I was also ashamed to hear that our pitifully small 6 plane air force was sent to bomb the middle east under Steven Harper, and I find him guilty of war crimes.

  • Mihail

    There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies ­not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy.” Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 2001

    “The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more”…. Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time – August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000

    ” [The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs.” Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts”. New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

    “The Palestinians” would be crushed like grasshoppers … heads smashed against the boulders and walls.” ” Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

    “When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle.” Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.

    David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti – Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.

    “We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

    “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly the FBI’s cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.)

    ” … we should prepare to go over to the offensive with the aim of smashing Lebanon, Trans-jordan and Syria… The weak point in the Arab coalition is Lebanon [for] the Moslem regime is artificial and easy to undermine. A Christian state should be established… When we smash the [Arab] Legions strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan, too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria, and Cairo.” ” David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.

    “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum”

    Rabin’s description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. “We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters” Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion’s special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From “The Arabs in Israel” by Sabri Jiryas.

    “It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.” Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

    “Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.

    “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” — Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]

    “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

    Now you tell me what Mel Gibson said that is anywhere near as morally offensive!

    I dare you!

    • Thought provoking compilation of quotes to say the least…

    • flagella

      Jewish racism is endemic in Israel

      • Mara Cohen

        Really? Do tell!

        • annebeck58

          Read the comment. Then repeat your inane response. Yeesh.

  • E.X.C.E.L.L.E.N.T !

    (((3)))

  • Jeremy R. Hammond , thank you for this comprehensive compilation of data that will be of great use to writers and activists concerned with the role and policies of Zionist Israel. Your work and contribution is deeply appreciated by many people. I have also added the article to my two blogs:

    http://sudhan.wordpress.com/

    http://nasir-khan.blogspot.com/2010/01/rogue-state-israeli-violations-of-un.html

    • Thanks, Nasir.

      • Mara Cohen

        Oh Jeremy, misleading 3rd World Folks. Tsk, Tsk, Tsk. Just sad.

        • I would merely note how you failed to present any argument to support your “misleading” claim.

  • america has caused all of thisand she is failing so will israel who relies on the 5billion handout so it weapons can kill maim and destroy the palestinians.It will end sooner than we think.

  • Brilliant compilation Jeremy. Very handy while describing the Zionist entity’s rogue state of affairs…

  • michael

    For Mikhal, Are there any actual sources for these quotes, or just the made up ones that came up with, I mean seriously, if you even tried to use any of those sources in any respectable college class you would get an F.

    • MissCostello

      Of course there are historical sources for these quotes. Get off your ass and look. IF YOU DARE! I mean, seriously.

      • marisol

        And I should add the one from golda meier, she said “there is no such a thing as Palestinians”. Pathetic.

  • Thanks greatly, that was truly helpful info.

  • Yuval

    This list is the pure example of how biased the UN has been towards Israel.

    For some reasons you won’t see ANY UN resolution that condemn the exodus of around 1 Million Jews from Arab countries because the Arabs has massacred them there after the establishment of Israel.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Egypt violated human rights by poison-Gassed rebels in Yeman back in the 60’s.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Jordan has massacred THOUSANDS of “Palestinians” in the “Black September” of 1970. That’s probably because Jordan is allowed to defend itself from “Palestinian”‘s terrorism, and Israel doesn’t.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Syria has MURDERED 20,000 of their OWN citizens in El-Hama, 1982 in cold-blood, just because they opposed the dictatorship of Assad the father.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding the Iran-Iraq war, where both sides used chemical weapones against each other.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Arab countries are mis-treating their own citizens, how they massacre them like Lybia, Syria , Iran and so on, so forth do nowadays just like they did before.

    And why is that?

    Because the UN is nothing but a sad joke, rather say – a stage for Arab countries to show their hatred towards the state of Israel, that bravely pushed all their military attacks on it back

    • This list is just one insightful indication of what an outlaw regime Israel is.

    • Everett

      Have you considered the “possibility” that the UN may actually be right. Perhaps problem really is with Israel’s behaviour.

    • Trainman

      I don’t know any other member state of UN where a UN meditator has been assassinated, his murderers have been considered national heroes and the abettor elected for Prime Minister.

    • firestone

      LOL! Biased against Israel?
      Wikileaks: Ban-Ki Moon Worked with Israel to Undermine UN Report
      http://normanfinkelstein.com/2014/ban-ki-moon-accomplice-to-war-crimes/

    • Hamidah Fawad

      Really. And isn’t UN the reason Israel exists in the first place? Please decide whether UN is for or against Israel. You can’t keep using the UN card to suit your needs

    • Yuval: “For some reasons you won’t see ANY UN resolution that condemn the exodus of around 1 Million Jews from Arab countries because the Arabs has massacred them there after the establishment of Israel.”

      The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel called for “in-gathering of the exiles” and Israel strongly encouraged Jews from the region to move to Israel, to replace the 750,000 Arabs who had been ethnically cleansed before and during the 1948-49 war. No-one knows how many of these came voluntarily in response to the Zionist call, and how many were expelled or fled from the Arab countries. Almost all of these decided to take Israeli citizenship, thereby ceasing to be refugees.

  • A F

    You’re right, Yuval – if you don’t look, you won’t find them.

    What you WILL find are several Security Council resolutions that condemn Muslim states for the same crimes that Israel is plainly guilty of, and some of those are Chapter 7 resolutions, authorizing the use of force.

    What you WON’T find in the annals is the litany of failed Security Council resolutions that rightly condemn Israel’s egregious human rights and IHL violations – all scuttled by use of or threat of US/UK veto.

    Alas, “bias”, it is true: the UN tends to be biased against countries with abominable human rights records. Jerks.

  • The u.n reports?????? The u.n. is a farce and should not even be here. The countries in the u.n have always been against the jewish people and always for the arab states. There are a lot of americans who have NO respect for the u.n and wish it would just move it’s headquarters and stay out of the u.s. So, I am one who believes that Israel should be able to protect itself AND have their small piece of land.
    Anyway, I think the u.n. is just a obsolete, biased group of “wanna bes'” that should MOVE. Leave the u.s. alone.

    • MissCostello

      If you say so. Clown.

    • Sumayya Betty Williamson

      Palestine was Illegally Given to the Zionist back in 1948,(more than likely was in a planning stage way before that) While Massacring thousands and chasing Palestinians from their homes…Now I ask you, WHAT RIGHT DID THEY HAVE TO STEAL ANOTHER GROUPS COUNTRY WHERE ALL 3 ABRAHAMIC FAITHS LIVE SIDE BY SIDE…

      • Palestine was not “given” to the Zionists. It was taken, as you otherwise rightly indicate (stolen, yes), through violence and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians.

        • EstebanCafe

          Hold sir. Did the not the world vote and give the partition of ’48 give this land to Israel ? Did not 5 Arab armies attack it the same day ? Did not Israel increase it’s borders by taking land from attacking enemies ? Did not Israel in a “land for peace” effort give Gaza to the Palestinians ?

          I’m curious why the Palestinians do not innovate (beyond exploding vests) and create businesses; why their children’s schooling is focused on revenge and hate and not on programming and entrepreneurial pursuits. What say ye ?

          • Did the not the world vote and in the partition of ’48 give this land to Israel ?

            No, the world did no such thing. Please see here:
            http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/26/the-myth-of-the-u-n-creation-of-israel/

            Did not 5 Arab armies attack it the same day ?

            By the time neighboring Arab states managed to muster a military response, 300,000 Arabs had already been ethnically cleansed by the Zionist forces in their offensive operations.

            Did not Israel increase it’s borders by taking land from attacking enemies over the next decades ?

            No.

            Israel started the 1967 war with a surprise attack on Egypt on the morning of June 5 that wiped out most of its air force while it was still on the ground.

            As noted in UN Security Council resolution 242 calling on Israel to withdraw from the territories it occupied during that war, the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible under international law.

            Did not Israel, in a “land for peace” effort, give Gaza to the Palestinians ?

            No.

            Israel can’t have “given” Gaza to the Palestinians as Gaza was never Israel’s to give. See above.

            Moreever, the withdraw from Gaza was no “peace” effort. It provided the political cover necessary for an escalation of Israel’s illegal colonization of the West Bank, and Israel also implemented a blockade of Gaza, an illegal act of collective punishment under international law.

            I’m curious why the Palestinians do not innovate (beyond exploding vests) and create businesses…

            The question ignores the fact that the Palestinians have been living under a brutal and oppressive occupation regime. Particularly in Gaza, their very survival has depended a great deal on innovation and entrepreneurial pursuits, including the tunnel economy, where the free market has lived in the face of Israel’s illegal blockade.

          • EstebanCafe: No, Israel was not attacked by 5 Arab armies on May 15, 1948. Only Egyptian and Syrian forces entered territory within the borders declared by Israel on 14 May 1948 (i.e the area specified for the Jewish state in the UN partition plan). Jordanian and Iraqi forces entered only territory in Palestine, outside those borders, during the course of the war. Lebanese forces did not take part in the war. However, Zionist militias were already acting outside those borders well before the Mandate ended and Israel’s Declaration became effective. The Arab forces waited until the Mandate had ended. So Israel attacked Palestine first, and the action of the Arabs states was a response to that attack.

          • EstebanCafe

            “Only” Egyptian and Syrian forces entered “specified” Jewish state area on 14 May ? Nope. No war causation there.
            Sir, Israel was fighting for it’s life well before partition.

          • The Jewish community owned less than 7% of the land in Palestine on May 14, by which time a quarter of a million Arabs had been ethnically cleansed in order to establish the “Jewish state”.

          • No, the Mandate ended at midnight on May 14. Israel’s Declaration took effect 1 minute later, and Israel’s recognition by President Truman 10 minutes after that. Egyptian and Syrian forces entered Israel at daylight on the morning of 15 May.
            Contrast that with the behavior of the Zionists, who carried out a campaign of illegal immigration, arms smuggling and wholesale terrorism against the British authorities from the end of WWII. From the announcement of the UN partition plan they began to ethnically cleanse the area specified for the Jewish State in that plan, and then started to acquire territory outside the partition plan lines. As I emphasized, the Zionists attacked Palestine first, and the action of the Arab states on May 15 was a response to that attack. The 1948-49 war was an aggressive war of expansion by Israel. This is confirmed the fact that at the attempted peace conference in Lausanne at the end of the war, Israel refused point blank any withdrawal from the Armistice Lines, in spite of President Truman’s pleadings.

    • marisol

      You speak of utter ignorance and prejudice. You definitely do not know what a Treaty Body or Special Procedure is. There are independent commissions and rapporteurs who are impartial and report on various aspects of the israeli-palestine conflict. You should read and inform yourself before yelling to others, and the only thing we can see is that you are openly displaying your ignorance

    • GSUser

      Dude, I should piss on your grave.

  • Kishore Thampy

    The fact that you labored to compile this list of 79 odd resolutions is in itself commendable. We haave to assume you have been intellectually honest as most of us would not be able to expend the same effort in replicating this herculean effort.

    Decisions by the United Nations are considered part of international law. Security Council resolutions are binding. Israel itself was created by an act of the UN. Thus the Arabs cannot deny its legitimacy. Similarly Israel cannot deny the legitimacy of UNSC resolutions. And those Americans who spew hell fire and brimstone on the UN cannot have their cake and eat it. They have successfully used the UN to protect Israel from any international retribution. Equally, they have provided Israel the cover it needed to destroy the Palestinians as a nation.
    Without the UN there would be no Israel. Without the UN there would have been a Palestine state.

    • Just saying

      Israel exists because Israel is the Jewish land, not because the UNSC.

      • David Harmon

        Well apparently they think all lands are theirs, because they are everywhere except in their own country.

        • Mara Cohen

          Sad, but of course, Germans or British or French anywhere in the World is jolly. No matter whom they butchered to stay there. Got it. Thanks for the insight.

          • David Harmon

            Jews are Jews, and nothing else. You can’t claim to be a Jew and German. Surely you already knew that Mrs. Cohen. After all, you’re a Cohen.

          • Beatrix Rode

            Butchered stories made up by the Jews. The Talmud is a good example of that!! The Jews are the best storytellers in the world, the old testament is a great example of that! Numbers in Auschwitz changed from 4mil to 1.5 mil and the last number is still a blatant lie!!

        • Diana

          They don’t have a country. They are living a lie in Palestine.

        • Beatrix Rode

          Well said!

      • Israel is a “Jewish state” today because the Zionists ethnically cleansed Palestine of most of its Arab inhabitants.

        Not exactly something to be proud of.

        • Mara Cohen

          Jeremy, there are no “Palestinians” in Israel. There is no “Palestine. There are however, 1.5 million Israeli Arabs. I guess that would make the Israelis the most incompetent at “Ethnic Cleansing” in all History. Certainly don’t meet Arab Standards for Ethnic Cleansing, they cleaned out, butchered and expropriated nearly all the Ancient Jewish Communities of the MENA with their persecutions. Yemen is about the last… So Jeremy, before you put on your Jew Hate hat quite so snugly on the hat rack you call your head, you may wish to 1)Learn what Ethnic Cleansing” is, vs throwing out your libelous nonsense, and 2) Read the League of Nations Mandate to Great Britain, The San Remo Accords, and the Treaty of Sevres. Good luck with that! By the way, my Mizrahi Family were “Ethnically Cleansed” out of our homes in Hebron, by a gang of raping (my 11 year old Aunt Rachel) thieving, Arabs in 1929. And my Family was there when Omar and the Arabs invaded up from the Incense Road in 632 CE. We were there when the East Romans fought the Sassanids, the only time we were not in Hebron was while Hebron was ruled by the Crusaders. And we returned to both there and Jerusalem with the Kurds. Then in 1948 we lost our homes in east Jerusalem due to Jordanian Arab ethnic cleansing. And you really need to learn the definitions of the terms and concepts you throw around. Someone might note you haven’t a clue about what you are talking about.

          • The facts are as I stated them.

          • Mara Cohen

            LOL! You may wish to check the UN Charter. Creating a listing of Useless Nations Resolutions doesn’t automatically carry through into these resulting in Violations.
            The UN Charter makes it clear that the only binding resolutions are issued under Chapter VII, these all relate to keeping the peace and are extreme measure. The rest are advisory. There have been ZERO Chapter VII resolutions regarding Israel, so Israel has breached no UN resolutions, as ALL have been advisory (usually advising of a condemnation), and therefore there is no requirement to act. Here is a list of Chapter VII resolution, and the Wiki page that relates,

            The list of Chapter VII interventions includes:

            United Nations Security Council Resolution 82 (Korea)
            United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267 (Afghanistan)
            United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor
            United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo
            International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
            United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone
            United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda
            United Nations Angola Verification Mission II
            United Nations Operation in Somalia II
            United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission
            United Nations Protection Force (former Yugoslavia)
            Oil-for-Food Programme (Iraq)
            United Nations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti
            United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (Gulf War)
            United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 (Libya)

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter

            Sorry you’re such a Jew Hater, your choice, but your apparent hypocrisy in your articles implications really did need addressing. Good luck with your not the Journal for Foreign Policy. They actually attempt fact checking. And this is what happens when your prejudices overrun your journalistic ethics.

          • First, the argument that Security Council resolutions condemning Israel for violating international law are not legally binding is moot, since the international law Israel is being condemned for in the respective resolutions is binding on Israel.

            Second, Chapter VII deals with enforcement mechanisms. That resolutions not passed under Chapter VII are unenforceable does not render them “advisory”. They are legally binding as all members agree under Article 2 to act according to the principles of the UN Charter and Article 5 obligates members “to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter.”

          • Beatrix Rode

            Funny that the farther of history Herodotus (500BC) never mentioned the Jews or Israel, only Palestine.

        • Mara Cohen

          LOL!!! Ethnic Cleansing normally involves the clearance of a resident population in the majority of it’s entirety. This is certaily not the circumstance with Israel, but is however the Lefty Parrot Litany. Tell me Jeremy? What will occur when any of your Readers actually go to Israel and see any of the 1.5 Million Arab Israelis who live there. You must consider the Israeli Jews either the most incompetent people in all history, or you have your facts in error. Sounds like you need a good course in statistics, as well as history.

          • Ethnic Cleansing normally involves the clearance of a resident population in the majority of it’s entirety.

            Well, then, by your own standard, Palestine was ethnically cleansed, since the 700,000 who fled or were forcibly expelled and never allowed to return to their homes constituted more than half of the Arab population.

  • Everett

    UN appears inept, when it does not enforce its own resolutions.

    • Contemplo

      Chapter 7 resolutions in the UNSC regard actions to enforce the UNSC resolutions, up to and including the use of force . Thus far, the USA has successfully shielded Israel from Ch. 7 resolutions.

  • UN Security Council resolutions needs to be presented in context – which is completely missing here. If you are wondering how many of these resolutions were vetoed then check out my blog post on US vetoes of anti-Israel security council resolutions. http://www.telaviv1.org.il/2014/02/how-frequently-does-usa-veto-anti.html

    • None of the above resolutions were vetoed, if that’s what you mean. I don’t know what you mean by saying the context “is completely missing here”.

      • Unfortunately I’m too busy to analyze your list carefully (which is not to say I’m not interested). But there are only two resolutions from the last decade, and I don’t see how Israel violated them, it certainly isn’t in violation of them at present.
        In none of the reported cases do you give details of what the violation is. Violations can, of course, be a matter of debate.
        The other missing data is membership of the security council, who submitted the proposal and what the votes were.

        Nor do you give comparative data. Sudan or Somalia would seem to be
        worse cases from the last decade and both Lebanon and Syria have ongoing
        violations from the last decade, the first related to withdrawal of
        para-military forces from South of the Litani and the second to the use
        of chemical weapons.

        • This article is from 2010. I haven’t updated it. That said, to my knowledge, there aren’t any additional UNSC resolutions to add to the list. Why not? Well, the US has vetoed anything that came before the Council, or threatened to veto it so that it didn’t even go to a vote.

          The article doesn’t suggest that Israel is in violation of Resolution 1701 “at present”. As the opening paragraph tells you, it is among the resolutions “directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.”

          As for Resolution 1860, which called for an end to Israel’s siege of Gaza, Israel does indeed remain in violation of it.

          If you want to find the voting records on each resolution, you can do so on the UN website. That is beyond the scope of this piece. Likewise beyond the scope of this piece is a comparison between Israel and other countries. You can do your own research and write your own article if these are things you’d like to explore.

          • Israel allows passage of goods to and from Gaza as required, though there are multiple restrictions, however it is not a total siege. In that sense it complies with the resolution, the resolution is a bit vague about how much freedom Israel must give. You can see examples of travel and trade in this article by BeTselem http://www.btselem.org/gaza_strip/20131015_rafah_closing_and_the_right_to_freedom_of_movement.

          • It allows passage of goods “as required”? It is not a “total” siege? What meaningless statements. Israel remains in violation of Resolution 1860 and its ongoing blockade of both goods and people into and out of the Gaza Strip is a policy of collective punishment in violation of international law.

  • PickPocket

    Living the Jewish dream of Apartheid!

  • Anas Suhaimi

    Sickening…

  • Obelisk

    Impressive list, is there also one available for the other side? Guess Hamas and the Arab neighbours of Israel don’t have clean hands either. In war there are always two sides to the story, its important to tell that as well.

  • No, there is not a list of UNSC resolutions against Palestine, as Palestine until 2012 was not recognized as a state and to this day is not a member of the UN.

  • Taylor Burton

    ..

  • boss4freedom

    This topic and most of the comments made here could make me break out into hysterical laughter if it wasn’t such a deadly serious situation.You have nothing better to do with your time than to dig up stuff that is so biased and based on BS the UN Paper Tiger (Toilet Paper Tiger) puts out, just to justify their existence, that have to show they do SOMETHING? Here is a project for you: find how many palestinian mothers are training their children to strap on bombs to go and blow up other children. Or how about make a wonderful “compilation” of all the civilians that have been killed by these low-lives shooting rockets and missiles from schools, mosques and hospitals into Israeli neighborhoods killing mostly women and children? Then report how these incidents got handled by that precious UN and condemned, Seems most people commenting here are at best ill informed. Just try watching the news on other channels, the one you are watching now has an agenda, the consequences thereto would be to tragic to contemplate. Wake up and look on both sides of the fence for once!

    • I am an American. The US government does not support Palestinian crimes against Israelis. It does, however, support Israeli crimes against Palestinians, which occur on an incomparably greater scale. Perhaps you should take your own advice to “look on both sides of the fence”. It is a moral coward and a hypocrite who points only to the “other” side while excusing the actions of one’s own country.

  • Sumayya Betty Williamson

    Wonderful……………..But,Where is Resolution 194. 12/1948.?The right to Return…….

    • This list is only of Security Council resolutions. Resolution 194 is a General Assembly resolution.

  • Cain Abel

    Boring list is boring.

    The UN is a useless bunch of useless morons making useless declarations.

    • xToddrick

      Actually you just described yourself. About time you got something correct.

      • Cain Abel

        How is the UN not useless, assOle?

        • We could stipulate that the UN is “useless” and it wouldn’t change the fact that Israel perpetually violates international law.

          • Cain Abel

            How is international law not useless?

          • Cain Abel

            Israel is the victim here.

        • xToddrick

          There you go again making a blanket statement and then asking for proof. Be specific. While not perfect the United Nations helps many people in world. And you often like to call people by vulgar names. Huh, there’s that pattern of you being childish again.

          • Cain Abel

            UN = useless bunch of parasites

      • Cain Abel

        Shut up, dickhead.

        • xToddrick

          Awe

  • Sufyaan Ibrahim

    hi jeremy! this great thanks so much its gonna be really useful for my IB extended essay (UN’s involvement in the arab israeli conflict) however i was wondering if you could tell me exactly how many resolutions there are? i kinda need to know and would be a short cut to having to count them all…
    thanks so much!

  • Posterchimp

    PSYCHOPATH Israel and the diaspora must be dealt with.

  • “The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was
    “given” by a foreign Power to another people for the creation of a new
    State. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people
    were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers
    have increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this
    spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees
    have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the
    denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No
    people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from
    their own country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to
    accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate? A permanent just
    settlement of the refugees in their homelands is an essential ingredient
    of any just settlement in the Middle East.”

    ― Bertrand Russell 1970―

  • desertspeaks

    the article forgot to mention that Israel is a FAILED WELFARE STATE! Since it’s inception, there hasn’t been one single day that Israel hasn’t survived on WELFARE from various other foreign countries, who forcibly tax their own citizens to keep the FAILED WELFARE STATE OF ISRAEL FROM COLLAPSING!
    Were these states to withhold ISRAELS WELFARE, or IF Israel were to refuse their WELFARE.. Israel would become a defunct state within 30 days, perhaps longer with LYING ACCOUNTING but ultimately it would COLLAPSE!

  • Israel is a party to the UN Charter and is thus legally obligated to comply with Security Council resolutions. Israel also has an obligation not to violate customary international law, as well as the Geneva Conventions, to which it is also party.

  • ruedi bosshart

    338 missing
    S/RES/338 (1973)
    22 October 1973
    http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/7FB7C26FCBE80A31852560C50065F878

    but excellent assortment.
    thank you

  • Just saying

    As an Israeli Jew, this list makes me proud, and I hope it will get even longer, doubled, tripled and quadrupled. Cheers, UN clowns

    • GSUser

      All of which has been done in the name of “the only democracy in the Middle East” my ass. Fuck Israel

  • toysandme

    The best recent update on the Palestinian situation, by a Jewish-American activist:

    https://youtu.be/Ch5XlEZoi1c

  • Mara Cohen

    Your featured comment does nothing but demonstrate your lack of acumen in Military History.

    • I would merely note how you failed to present an argument to support your assertion. I take the fact that you didn’t support it as indicative of the fact that you can’t.

      • Joe Baker

        Israel’s mistreatment of the Palestinian people may be finally open for discussion by the Labour movement in the UK. Thanks for compiling and publishing this evidence lead discourse which is helpful. That said, the bile that infects some correspondents is as enlightening as the facts themselves.

  • GSUser

    Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) 1

    Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) 2

    Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) 3

    Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) 4

    Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) 5

    Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) 6

    Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) 7

    Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) 8

    Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) 9

    Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) 10

    Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) 11

    Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) 12

    Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) 13

    Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) 14

    Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) 15

    Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) 16

    Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) 17

    Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) 18

    Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) 19

    Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) 20

    Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) 21

    Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) 22

    Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) 23

    Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) 24

    Res. 298 (Sep. 25, 1971) 25

    Res. 313 (Feb. 28, 1972) 26

    Res. 316 (Jun. 26, 1972) 27

    Res. 317 (Jul. 21, 1972) 28

    Res. 332 (Apr. 21, 1972) 29

    Res. 337 (Aug. 15, 1973) 30

    Res. 347 (Apr. 24, 1974) 31

    Res. 425 (Mar. 19, 1978) 32

    Res. 427 (May 3, 1978) 33

    Res. 446 (Mar. 22, 1979) 34

    Res. 450 (Jun. 14, 1979) 35

    Res. 452 (Jul. 20, 1979) 36

    Res. 465 (Mar. 1, 1980) 37

    Res. 467 (Apr. 24, 1980) 38

    Res. 468 (May 8, 1980) 39

    Res. 469 (May 20, 1980) 40

    Res. 471 (Jun. 5, 1980) 41

  • GSUser

    Hey Jeremy, this article is from 2010, which is old. Can you please update it? Because now they reached 100 violated resolutions, all of which has been done in the name of “the only democracy in the Middle East” my ass. Fuck Israel & fuck all those dumb cunts who supports them.

  • GSUser

    Iraq violated only 2 UN resolutions and their country was invaded and turned into ruins. Israel violated 100 UN resolutions and nothing happens. And remember, the UN was established shortly after WWII to “prevent another such conflict”. lol.

  • GSUser

    For those who wants to count the list quickly, they’re 79

  • GSUser

    Iraq violated only 2 UN resolutions and their country was invaded and turned into ruins. Israel violated 100 UN resolutions and nothing happens. And remember, the UN was established shortly after WWII to “prevent another such conflict”. lol.

  • GSUser

    Hey Jeremy, this article is from 2010, which is old. Can you please update it? Because now they violated about over 100 UN resolutions, all of which has been done in the name of “the only democracy in the Middle East” my ass. Fuck Israel & fuck all those dumb cunts who supports them.

  • Blake

    Have there been any since 2009?

  • Mustafa Kemal

    American support for Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinian natives repeats its crimes against its own native population