Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions

Following is a list of United Nations Security Council resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.

The United Nations Security Council Chamber in New York

The United Nations Security Council Chamber in New York

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 View All

Jeremy R. Hammond

HomepageFacebookTwitterLinkedInYouTubeGoogle+
Jeremy R. Hammond
Jeremy R. Hammond is an independent political analyst and a recipient of the Project Censored Award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism. He is the founding editor of Foreign Policy Journal and the author of Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian economics in the financial crisis and The Rejection of Palestinian Self-Determination: The Struggle for Palestine and the Roots of the Israeli-Arab Conflict. His forthcoming book is on the contemporary U.S. role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 

57 Responses to "Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions"

  1. Doru  January 27, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    Wonderful compilation , Kudos !

    Now , let’s all send a copy to our Presidents/Prime Ministers/Members of Congress-MPs , and ask them :
    ‘ As a country we can be judge by the friends and people we support . Do you support a rogue country with such a UN record ? If yes , you must explain since your support would make you and our Country an Accessory to Crime , a criminal offence under International and Local Law ‘ .

    Just do it ! Please .

    Thank you ,

    Doru
    Canada

    Reply
    • Maurício Mmp  August 10, 2014 at 12:44 am

      Doru, good to see that from Canada. I lived there for some years and am pretty shocked with Harper´s unconditional support of Israel. The Crime Minister, as he is now being called, even refused to ask for a 2-state solution. I hope you all go to the streets and storm Ottawa with massive protests!!

      Reply
  2. Mihail  January 28, 2010 at 6:45 am

    There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies ­not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy.” Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 2001

    “The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more”…. Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time – August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000

    ” [The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs.” Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the Beasts”. New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

    “The Palestinians” would be crushed like grasshoppers … heads smashed against the boulders and walls.” ” Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

    “When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle.” Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.

    David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti – Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.

    “We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

    “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly the FBI’s cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.)

    ” … we should prepare to go over to the offensive with the aim of smashing Lebanon, Trans-jordan and Syria… The weak point in the Arab coalition is Lebanon [for] the Moslem regime is artificial and easy to undermine. A Christian state should be established… When we smash the [Arab] Legions strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan, too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria, and Cairo.” ” David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.

    “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum”

    Rabin’s description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. “We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters” Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion’s special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From “The Arabs in Israel” by Sabri Jiryas.

    “It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.” Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

    “Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.

    “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” — Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]

    “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

    Now you tell me what Mel Gibson said that is anywhere near as morally offensive!

    I dare you!

    Reply
    • Moign Khawaja  February 18, 2010 at 7:06 pm

      Thought provoking compilation of quotes to say the least…

      Reply
    • flagella  July 22, 2014 at 6:35 am

      Jewish racism is endemic in Israel

      Reply
  3. Donald F. Truax  January 29, 2010 at 5:37 am

    E.X.C.E.L.L.E.N.T !

    (((3)))

    Reply
  4. Nasir Khan  January 29, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    Jeremy R. Hammond , thank you for this comprehensive compilation of data that will be of great use to writers and activists concerned with the role and policies of Zionist Israel. Your work and contribution is deeply appreciated by many people. I have also added the article to my two blogs:

    http://sudhan.wordpress.com/

    http://nasir-khan.blogspot.com/2010/01/rogue-state-israeli-violations-of-un.html

    Reply
  5. Augustbrhm  February 4, 2010 at 11:25 pm

    america has caused all of thisand she is failing so will israel who relies on the 5billion handout so it weapons can kill maim and destroy the palestinians.It will end sooner than we think.

    Reply
  6. Moign Khawaja  February 18, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    Brilliant compilation Jeremy. Very handy while describing the Zionist entity’s rogue state of affairs…

    Reply
  7. michael  September 20, 2010 at 11:26 pm

    For Mikhal, Are there any actual sources for these quotes, or just the made up ones that came up with, I mean seriously, if you even tried to use any of those sources in any respectable college class you would get an F.

    Reply
    • MissCostello  April 30, 2014 at 6:37 pm

      Of course there are historical sources for these quotes. Get off your ass and look. IF YOU DARE! I mean, seriously.

      Reply
      • marisol  August 3, 2014 at 1:59 pm

        And I should add the one from golda meier, she said “there is no such a thing as Palestinians”. Pathetic.

        Reply
  8. Water Damage  February 14, 2011 at 3:44 am

    Thanks greatly, that was truly helpful info.

    Reply
  9. Yuval  April 13, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    This list is the pure example of how biased the UN has been towards Israel.

    For some reasons you won’t see ANY UN resolution that condemn the exodus of around 1 Million Jews from Arab countries because the Arabs has massacred them there after the establishment of Israel.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Egypt violated human rights by poison-Gassed rebels in Yeman back in the 60’s.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Jordan has massacred THOUSANDS of “Palestinians” in the “Black September” of 1970. That’s probably because Jordan is allowed to defend itself from “Palestinian”‘s terrorism, and Israel doesn’t.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Syria has MURDERED 20,000 of their OWN citizens in El-Hama, 1982 in cold-blood, just because they opposed the dictatorship of Assad the father.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding the Iran-Iraq war, where both sides used chemical weapones against each other.

    You won’t find there ANY condemnation regarding how Arab countries are mis-treating their own citizens, how they massacre them like Lybia, Syria , Iran and so on, so forth do nowadays just like they did before.

    And why is that?

    Because the UN is nothing but a sad joke, rather say – a stage for Arab countries to show their hatred towards the state of Israel, that bravely pushed all their military attacks on it back

    Reply
    • Jeremy R. Hammond
      Jeremy R. Hammond  April 14, 2011 at 1:02 am

      This list is just one insightful indication of what an outlaw regime Israel is.

      Reply
    • Everett  July 31, 2011 at 5:06 am

      Have you considered the “possibility” that the UN may actually be right. Perhaps problem really is with Israel’s behaviour.

      Reply
    • Trainman  July 20, 2014 at 5:28 pm

      I don’t know any other member state of UN where a UN meditator has been assassinated, his murderers have been considered national heroes and the abettor elected for Prime Minister.

      Reply
    • firestone  August 11, 2014 at 8:40 pm

      LOL! Biased against Israel?
      Wikileaks: Ban-Ki Moon Worked with Israel to Undermine UN Report
      http://normanfinkelstein.com/2014/ban-ki-moon-accomplice-to-war-crimes/

      Reply
  10. A F  May 16, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    You’re right, Yuval – if you don’t look, you won’t find them.

    What you WILL find are several Security Council resolutions that condemn Muslim states for the same crimes that Israel is plainly guilty of, and some of those are Chapter 7 resolutions, authorizing the use of force.

    What you WON’T find in the annals is the litany of failed Security Council resolutions that rightly condemn Israel’s egregious human rights and IHL violations – all scuttled by use of or threat of US/UK veto.

    Alas, “bias”, it is true: the UN tends to be biased against countries with abominable human rights records. Jerks.

    Reply
  11. mrsb8  June 8, 2011 at 6:40 am

    The u.n reports?????? The u.n. is a farce and should not even be here. The countries in the u.n have always been against the jewish people and always for the arab states. There are a lot of americans who have NO respect for the u.n and wish it would just move it’s headquarters and stay out of the u.s. So, I am one who believes that Israel should be able to protect itself AND have their small piece of land.
    Anyway, I think the u.n. is just a obsolete, biased group of “wanna bes'” that should MOVE. Leave the u.s. alone.

    Reply
    • MissCostello  April 30, 2014 at 6:31 pm

      If you say so. Clown.

      Reply
    • Sumayya Betty Williamson  August 3, 2014 at 8:47 am

      Palestine was Illegally Given to the Zionist back in 1948,(more than likely was in a planning stage way before that) While Massacring thousands and chasing Palestinians from their homes…Now I ask you, WHAT RIGHT DID THEY HAVE TO STEAL ANOTHER GROUPS COUNTRY WHERE ALL 3 ABRAHAMIC FAITHS LIVE SIDE BY SIDE…

      Reply
      • Jeremy R. Hammond
        Jeremy R. Hammond  August 3, 2014 at 9:20 am

        Palestine was not “given” to the Zionists. It was taken, as you otherwise rightly indicate (stolen, yes), through violence and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians.

        Reply
        • EstebanCafe  August 13, 2014 at 6:32 pm

          Hold sir. Did the not the world vote and give the partition of ’48 give this land to Israel ? Did not 5 Arab armies attack it the same day ? Did not Israel increase it’s borders by taking land from attacking enemies ? Did not Israel in a “land for peace” effort give Gaza to the Palestinians ?

          I’m curious why the Palestinians do not innovate (beyond exploding vests) and create businesses; why their children’s schooling is focused on revenge and hate and not on programming and entrepreneurial pursuits. What say ye ?

          Reply
          • Jeremy R. Hammond
            Jeremy R. Hammond  August 13, 2014 at 9:11 pm

            Did the not the world vote and in the partition of ’48 give this land to Israel ?

            No, the world did no such thing. Please see here:
            http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/26/the-myth-of-the-u-n-creation-of-israel/

            Did not 5 Arab armies attack it the same day ?

            By the time neighboring Arab states managed to muster a military response, 300,000 Arabs had already been ethnically cleansed by the Zionist forces in their offensive operations.

            Did not Israel increase it’s borders by taking land from attacking enemies over the next decades ?

            No.

            Israel started the 1967 war with a surprise attack on Egypt on the morning of June 5 that wiped out most of its air force while it was still on the ground.

            As noted in UN Security Council resolution 242 calling on Israel to withdraw from the territories it occupied during that war, the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible under international law.

            Did not Israel, in a “land for peace” effort, give Gaza to the Palestinians ?

            No.

            Israel can’t have “given” Gaza to the Palestinians as Gaza was never Israel’s to give. See above.

            Moreever, the withdraw from Gaza was no “peace” effort. It provided the political cover necessary for an escalation of Israel’s illegal colonization of the West Bank, and Israel also implemented a blockade of Gaza, an illegal act of collective punishment under international law.

            I’m curious why the Palestinians do not innovate (beyond exploding vests) and create businesses…

            The question ignores the fact that the Palestinians have been living under a brutal and oppressive occupation regime. Particularly in Gaza, their very survival has depended a great deal on innovation and entrepreneurial pursuits, including the tunnel economy, where the free market has lived in the face of Israel’s illegal blockade.

    • marisol  August 3, 2014 at 2:04 pm

      You speak of utter ignorance and prejudice. You definitely do not know what a Treaty Body or Special Procedure is. There are independent commissions and rapporteurs who are impartial and report on various aspects of the israeli-palestine conflict. You should read and inform yourself before yelling to others, and the only thing we can see is that you are openly displaying your ignorance

      Reply
  12. Kishore Thampy  July 21, 2011 at 12:01 am

    The fact that you labored to compile this list of 79 odd resolutions is in itself commendable. We haave to assume you have been intellectually honest as most of us would not be able to expend the same effort in replicating this herculean effort.

    Decisions by the United Nations are considered part of international law. Security Council resolutions are binding. Israel itself was created by an act of the UN. Thus the Arabs cannot deny its legitimacy. Similarly Israel cannot deny the legitimacy of UNSC resolutions. And those Americans who spew hell fire and brimstone on the UN cannot have their cake and eat it. They have successfully used the UN to protect Israel from any international retribution. Equally, they have provided Israel the cover it needed to destroy the Palestinians as a nation.
    Without the UN there would be no Israel. Without the UN there would have been a Palestine state.

    Reply
  13. Everett  July 31, 2011 at 5:02 am

    UN appears inept, when it does not enforce its own resolutions.

    Reply
    • Contemplo  October 27, 2013 at 2:37 pm

      Chapter 7 resolutions in the UNSC regard actions to enforce the UNSC resolutions, up to and including the use of force . Thus far, the USA has successfully shielded Israel from Ch. 7 resolutions.

      Reply
  14. Jonathan  June 2, 2014 at 9:43 am

    UN Security Council resolutions needs to be presented in context – which is completely missing here. If you are wondering how many of these resolutions were vetoed then check out my blog post on US vetoes of anti-Israel security council resolutions. http://www.telaviv1.org.il/2014/02/how-frequently-does-usa-veto-anti.html

    Reply
    • Jeremy R. Hammond
      Jeremy R. Hammond  June 2, 2014 at 11:47 pm

      None of the above resolutions were vetoed, if that’s what you mean. I don’t know what you mean by saying the context “is completely missing here”.

      Reply
      • Jonathan  June 18, 2014 at 11:19 am

        Unfortunately I’m too busy to analyze your list carefully (which is not to say I’m not interested). But there are only two resolutions from the last decade, and I don’t see how Israel violated them, it certainly isn’t in violation of them at present.
        In none of the reported cases do you give details of what the violation is. Violations can, of course, be a matter of debate.
        The other missing data is membership of the security council, who submitted the proposal and what the votes were.

        Nor do you give comparative data. Sudan or Somalia would seem to be
        worse cases from the last decade and both Lebanon and Syria have ongoing
        violations from the last decade, the first related to withdrawal of
        para-military forces from South of the Litani and the second to the use
        of chemical weapons.

        Reply
        • Jeremy R. Hammond
          Jeremy R. Hammond  June 18, 2014 at 11:32 pm

          This article is from 2010. I haven’t updated it. That said, to my knowledge, there aren’t any additional UNSC resolutions to add to the list. Why not? Well, the US has vetoed anything that came before the Council, or threatened to veto it so that it didn’t even go to a vote.

          The article doesn’t suggest that Israel is in violation of Resolution 1701 “at present”. As the opening paragraph tells you, it is among the resolutions “directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.”

          As for Resolution 1860, which called for an end to Israel’s siege of Gaza, Israel does indeed remain in violation of it.

          If you want to find the voting records on each resolution, you can do so on the UN website. That is beyond the scope of this piece. Likewise beyond the scope of this piece is a comparison between Israel and other countries. You can do your own research and write your own article if these are things you’d like to explore.

          Reply
          • Jonathan  June 19, 2014 at 6:03 am

            Israel allows passage of goods to and from Gaza as required, though there are multiple restrictions, however it is not a total siege. In that sense it complies with the resolution, the resolution is a bit vague about how much freedom Israel must give. You can see examples of travel and trade in this article by BeTselem http://www.btselem.org/gaza_strip/20131015_rafah_closing_and_the_right_to_freedom_of_movement.

          • Jeremy R. Hammond
            Jeremy R. Hammond  June 19, 2014 at 10:24 am

            It allows passage of goods “as required”? It is not a “total” siege? What meaningless statements. Israel remains in violation of Resolution 1860 and its ongoing blockade of both goods and people into and out of the Gaza Strip is a policy of collective punishment in violation of international law.

  15. PickPocket  July 13, 2014 at 2:25 pm

    Living the Jewish dream of Apartheid!

    Reply
  16. Anas Suhaimi  July 14, 2014 at 6:17 pm

    Sickening…

    Reply
  17. Obelisk  July 18, 2014 at 4:20 am

    Impressive list, is there also one available for the other side? Guess Hamas and the Arab neighbours of Israel don’t have clean hands either. In war there are always two sides to the story, its important to tell that as well.

    Reply
  18. Jeremy R. Hammond
    Jeremy R. Hammond  July 19, 2014 at 10:44 am

    No, there is not a list of UNSC resolutions against Palestine, as Palestine until 2012 was not recognized as a state and to this day is not a member of the UN.

    Reply
  19. Taylor Burton  July 30, 2014 at 9:43 pm

    ..

    Reply
  20. boss4freedom  July 31, 2014 at 9:35 am

    This topic and most of the comments made here could make me break out into hysterical laughter if it wasn’t such a deadly serious situation.You have nothing better to do with your time than to dig up stuff that is so biased and based on BS the UN Paper Tiger (Toilet Paper Tiger) puts out, just to justify their existence, that have to show they do SOMETHING? Here is a project for you: find how many palestinian mothers are training their children to strap on bombs to go and blow up other children. Or how about make a wonderful “compilation” of all the civilians that have been killed by these low-lives shooting rockets and missiles from schools, mosques and hospitals into Israeli neighborhoods killing mostly women and children? Then report how these incidents got handled by that precious UN and condemned, Seems most people commenting here are at best ill informed. Just try watching the news on other channels, the one you are watching now has an agenda, the consequences thereto would be to tragic to contemplate. Wake up and look on both sides of the fence for once!

    Reply
    • Jeremy R. Hammond
      Jeremy R. Hammond  July 31, 2014 at 11:51 am

      I am an American. The US government does not support Palestinian crimes against Israelis. It does, however, support Israeli crimes against Palestinians, which occur on an incomparably greater scale. Perhaps you should take your own advice to “look on both sides of the fence”. It is a moral coward and a hypocrite who points only to the “other” side while excusing the actions of one’s own country.

      Reply
  21. Sumayya Betty Williamson  August 3, 2014 at 8:32 am

    Wonderful……………..But,Where is Resolution 194. 12/1948.?The right to Return…….

    Reply
    • Jeremy R. Hammond
      Jeremy R. Hammond  August 3, 2014 at 9:18 am

      This list is only of Security Council resolutions. Resolution 194 is a General Assembly resolution.

      Reply
  22. Cain Abel  August 10, 2014 at 12:30 am

    Boring list is boring.

    The UN is a useless bunch of useless morons making useless declarations.

    Reply
    • xToddrick  August 15, 2014 at 11:48 am

      Actually you just described yourself. About time you got something correct.

      Reply
      • Cain Abel  August 15, 2014 at 12:05 pm

        How is the UN not useless, assOle?

        Reply
        • Jeremy R. Hammond
          Jeremy R. Hammond  August 16, 2014 at 12:48 pm

          We could stipulate that the UN is “useless” and it wouldn’t change the fact that Israel perpetually violates international law.

          Reply
          • Cain Abel  August 16, 2014 at 3:43 pm

            How is international law not useless?

          • Cain Abel  August 20, 2014 at 5:46 pm

            Israel is the victim here.

        • xToddrick  August 17, 2014 at 6:22 pm

          There you go again making a blanket statement and then asking for proof. Be specific. While not perfect the United Nations helps many people in world. And you often like to call people by vulgar names. Huh, there’s that pattern of you being childish again.

          Reply
          • Cain Abel  August 20, 2014 at 5:42 pm

            UN = useless bunch of parasites

      • Cain Abel  August 20, 2014 at 5:48 pm

        Shut up, dickhead.

        Reply
        • xToddrick  August 20, 2014 at 6:19 pm

          Awe

          Reply
  23. Sufyaan Ibrahim  September 14, 2014 at 6:09 pm

    hi jeremy! this great thanks so much its gonna be really useful for my IB extended essay (UN’s involvement in the arab israeli conflict) however i was wondering if you could tell me exactly how many resolutions there are? i kinda need to know and would be a short cut to having to count them all…
    thanks so much!

    Reply

Join the Discussion