A unified Middle East will prove to be the first step towards actual world peace.
Ever since World War I, if there is one region of the world that has been in constant turmoil, it is the Middle East (or West Asia, whichever way you like to call it). European imperialism, post-colonial despotism or neo-colonialism — there are many reasons for the plight of the Middle East. (I discussed the historical factors responsible for the ongoing strife in the Middle East in an earlier article.)
A century has passed since the First World War, and while the rest of the world has moved on, the Middle East still continues to be in trouble, with a new issue arising every other day. As painful as it might be, the fact remains that the Middle East still has a long way to go, and the region has, so far, not risen from the ashes of the First World War.
What lies ahead for the Middle Eastern people and countries?
A Bad Scenario
Back in 2011, the world witnessed a series of dissident events — what would later be known as Arab Spring. All around the Middle Eastern world, people hailed such revolutions and protests as the harbingers of change. A new Middle East was in the making! The people’s voices!
Coming to the present day, and the dreams and fancy talks have fallen flat. Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya or Egypt: you name the country, and you will see that the apparatus is either on the brink of collapse, or there are murky clouds covering the future.
The only thing the Arab Spring actually accomplished was that it destabilized the region by proxy. Combine that with the fact that foreign interference in the Middle East has done total harm and zero good, and you will have a perfect recipe for disaster. As such, when you see Libya, Syria and Iraq in a state of total abyss, and the war in Yemen on the brink of escalating to Vietnamesque proportions, you won’t have a hard time looking for reasons behind all the carnage.
Beyond that, we also have the rather unwanted presence of Israel in the region, plus the ridiculous tug of war between Iran and Saudi Arabia. In the light of all of this, it will be safe to conclude that the post-Ottoman regional order, as envisioned by the Western powers, has collapsed.
The Solution?
At this point, broadly speaking, we can enumerate all that is going wrong in the Middle East:
- Conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc.
- Clash of interests between Iran and Saudi Arabia
- Presence of foreign powers, especially NATO
- The issue between Israel and Palestine
- Societal problems (gender, illiteracy, you name it!)
I have omitted terrorism and the presence of players such as ISIS, simply because I consider such factions to be a by-product of a bigger conflict, and once the above five issues disappear or are resolved, it won’t be long before militancy ceases to exist.
For all of the above problems, many possible solutions have been suggested. Folks who consider religious fundamentalism to be the key culprit have called for reforms, as opposed to those who consider Islamism to be the better solution.
It is proven beyond doubt that authoritarian thuggery exists in the Middle East simply because foreign hegemons have established it as the way of the world. USA and its allies have vested interests in Middle East, and it is beneficial for them to have governments that are favorable to their cause. As such, political abuse of power is nothing new, albeit the only ones who suffer badly are the common people of the region.
Thing is, the solution isn’t far when you look for it: unification is the only way forward. As long as false borders continue to exist in the region, the Middle East will not progress. The biggest thing that went wrong after World War I was that a fake sense of nationalism came to the fore: people who were otherwise mutually related became citizens/subjects of different countries. Over the course of the century, such fake nationalist pride has only become stronger, and it is not uncommon to find the average youth of the Middle East considering themselves as Egyptians or Iraqis or Jordanians, and not as part of one coherent nation state.
Conclusion
As such, for the Middle East to truly blossom and bloom, it is essential that fake borders are abolished. That said, it seems highly unlikely that any form of unification or integration might happen during the oil era, especially because both domestic dictators and foreign hegemons are eager to keep the falsely-drawn borders intact.
How or when can unification happen? This is a question which, unfortunately, still lacks an answer. However, it is certain beyond doubt that unless the countries of the Middle East are unified to form one true nation-state, the problem will not perish. The war in Iraq and Syria will not take time to reach Bahrain, whereas the dissent in Egypt will surely escalate to Tunisia or Libya, and so on. Since the conflicts do not obey fake borders, neither should the solutions.
Of course, this might mean that certain regional superpowers and political dictators or rulers might find themselves out of business. But for what it’s worth, their presence is hardly helping anyone!
A unified Middle East will prove to be the first step towards actual world peace. For now, this is the only plausible and logical solution.
To me, it is not a question of nationhood. It is more of a question of when are these countries going to enter the 20th century? Or for that matter, the 21st century.
Under Ottoman rule, the Middle East had no borders. Damascus and Baghdad were the important centres of authority, as were Beirut, Jerusalem, Mosul and Basra all had representation in the Turkish Parliament.
It was a system that had evolved as a consensus of the inhabitants of the M.E. and it provided some 600 years of stability, indeed the West has long regarded the M.E. as a romantic, mysterious part of the world with people who had a reputation for hospitality.
That was blown apart after WW1, By the British, French and later the US.
The existing Arab leadership was exiled or jailed, and a long established and proven system, was replaced with artificially imposed borders inspired, in the main by British Imperial interest of a direct overland rout to India and protection of the Suez Canal.
Collaborating Arab Government were created in the artificial countries of Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait and Lebanon. Kurdistan was divided (with Turkey taking a share).
Arab sensibilities and Arab objections were simply disregarded.
In the Hijaz, the dominant Hashemite leader Fisal was given Syria to rule, the French kicked him out so Britain gave him Iraq to rule, Fisal`s elder brother Abdullah was given Transjordan.
In the 1930`s oil was discovered in Hijaz, and, with US influence, the Saudi family was installed as rulers, renaming Hijas as Saudi Arabia, much to the anger of the Heashemite dynasty, who still claim Hijaz.
In Palestine the British were more devious, applying double standards with reassurances to Palestinian leaders, while employing European Zionist immigrants into key positions in the Palestinian Civil Service, what had been in 1919 a Palestinian administrative system 100% Palestinian run, consisted by 1934, of 60% European Zionist employees (By 1944, only 6% Civil Service employees were intrinsic Palestinians)
The US assumed Britain`s role in 1947 with unconditional financial military and diplomatic support to Zionist Israel. Middle East countries that were complied with Western demands were supported, those that were not, were attacked overtly or covertly by the US.
The Middle East today, consists of self interested establishments hanging on to artificial Western creations and a population very discontent with their situation.
The Arab Spring is an Arab revolution with the US inspired Western Air strikes on those that the West dislikes.
Iran alone has succeeded in it`s own “peoples revolution”. A country of some 80 million people, and the worlds third largest know oil reserves, with a deep distrust of the US and profitable growing trading relations with China and Russia.
Then there is Islamic State, a fanatical organisation, but one that clearly has popular support, and support that is not confined to the people of the Middle East.
And still the only reaction from the West, is to Bomb, if it were a comic book story, it would not be believed.