Putin’s article in the September 11 New York Times has the stuck pigs squealing.
The squealing stuck pigs are just who you thought they would be—all those whose agendas and profits would be furthered by an attack on Syria by the Obama Stasi regime.
Included among the squealing stuck pigs are Human Rights Watch bloggers who seem to be financed out of the CIA’s back pocket.
Does any institution remain that has not been corrupted by Washington’s money?
Notice that the reason Putin is being criticized is that he has blocked the Obama regime from attacking Syria and slaughtering countless numbers of Syrians in the name of human rights. The stuck pigs are outraged that Obama’s war has been blocked. They were so much looking forward to the mass slaughter that they believe would advance their profits and agendas.
Most of Putin’s critics are too intellectually challenged to comprehend that Putin’s brilliant and humane article has left Putin the leader of the free world and defender of the rule of law and exposed Obama for what he is—the leader of a rogue, lawless, unaccountable government committed to lies and war crimes.
Putin, being diplomatic, was very careful in his criticism of Obama’s September 10 speech in which Obama sought to justify Washington’s lawlessness in terms of “American exceptionalism.” Obama, attempting to lift his criminal regime by the bootstraps up into the moral heavens, claimed that United States government policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.”
What Obama told Americans is exactly what Hitler told the Germans. The Russians, having borne more than anyone else the full weight of the German war machine, know how dangerous it is to encourage people to think of themselves as exceptional, unbound by law, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Security Council, and humane concerns for others. Putin reminded Obama that “God created us equal.”
If Putin had wanted to give Obama the full rebuke that Obama deserves, Putin could have said: “Obama is correct that the policy of the US government is what makes the US exceptional. The US is the only country in the world that has attacked 8 countries in 12 years, murdering and dispossessing millions of Muslims all on the basis of lies. This is not an exceptionalism of which to be proud.”
Putin is obviously more than a match for the immoral, low grade morons that Americans put into high office. However, Putin should not underestimate the mendacity of his enemies in Washington. Putin warned that the militants that Washington is breeding in the Middle East are an issue of deep concern. When these militants return to their own countries, they spread destabilization, as when extremists used by the US in the overthrow of Libya moved on to Mali.
The destabilization of other countries is precisely the main aim of Washington’s wars in the Middle East. Washington intends for radicalization of Muslims to spread strife into the Muslim populations of Russia and China. Washington’s propaganda machine will then turn these terrorists into “freedom fighters against oppressive Russian and Chinese governments,” and use Human Rights Watch and other organizations that Washington has penetrated and corrupted to denounce Russia and China for committing war crimes against freedom fighters. No doubt, chemical weapons attacks will be orchestrated, just as they have been in Syria.
If Washington’s NATO puppet states wake up in time, the warmongers in Washington can be isolated, and humanity could be spared WWIII.
The delayed but welcome entry of Putin in the so far ‘one man show’ of the US govt., under the Bushes and then Obama in the world theater which is stained with the blood of Muslims, after the US succeeded in disintegrating the USSR, is going to make a positive impact on the world affairs so badly influenced by the sole super power which is radicalizing the world with each passing day on the pretext of Al Qaeda ( I came across a wonderful question today: why has Al Qaeda not attacked Israel so far, which is running the US govt. like a puppet?). All the justice loving people/countries must come forward now to make a difference and try to make the world safe from the outright rogue, whimsical and obsessional tendencies of the US government. NATO states would do well to re-frame their policies on the considerations which are based on the principles justice, rather than bare US dictation, so as to make the world a beautiful place to live. Is it asking for too much? Don’t we need an international law that will ensure world peace and prosperity? We surely do, or our coming generations will be right in calling us anything evil they like.
While I agree with Fida Ahmed`s general comments, I`m uncomfortable with the emphasis of “blood of Muslims”.
I`m also uncomfortable with the Israeli (and US) promotion of a Palestinian/Israeli conflict, as being between “Jews and Arabs”, it is disingenuous! “Jews” describes people with a specific religious belief, “Arab” describes an ethnic people.
In the Middle East, certainly there are Arab Muslims, also a sizeable minority of Arab Christians and Arab Jews who did not nor do not accept the theft of Arab land to create a Zionist State, which was, and continues to be, stained by Arab blood.
The creation of the Zionist State of Israel was by the colonisation of Arab land by several ethnic groups having a common religion, with British, then American approval.
Careful Mr. Roberts – you’re fellating and swallowing Putin’s cum so deeply he’ll have you thrown in jail for sodomy under his human rights oppressing anti-gay laws!
Osama is still alive? Wear your tin foil hat, don’t drink fluoridated water, and watch out Hitler’s, I mean Obama’s black helicopters, you conspiracy-mongering weirdo.
Ah, a comment consisting entirely of logical fallacies, i.e., strawman and ad hominem argumentation. You are welcome, Unlikable guy, to actually address the points made in the article.
You do know that fluoride is a known neurotoxin, right?
Ah well then to avoid the oppressive mind-controlling Hitler police regime of Obama you better go dig a fresh water well and live in a cabin in the woods, load up with all sorts guns, home school your kids and study Craig Roberts’ manifesto.
The point of the article is again to lob conspiracy theories and assign some diplomatic altruistic motivations to Russia and its ignoble leader Putin. You do now see how the Russians and China have been covering for Assad’s chemical weapons use? You must see they were lying about his regime not having them? You do see that most Americans could give two craps about Syria and we would do well to disinvest ourselves from the region, but once in a while we should intervene if there’s a crisis the US alone could stop (or were you fine with Jews getting gassed in WW2 or Muslims being cleansed in Yugoslavia)? You do see that while Muslim countries are some of the most repressive, racist, class-ist, and sexist on the planet, its their choice to make – but that it doesn’t imply that China nor Russia have democratic goals in defending Syria – they’re just doing it out of geopolitical maneuvering?
Also you do know Russia is the largest supplier of arms to Assad, selling billions of dollars to weapons systems to Assad, which the “ex” KGB thug no doubt has a piece of?
I am glad that there appears to be a diplomatic intervention in the
works, but it’s funny how you attack our government rather than showing
any outrage towards the lying killer dictator who unlike Saddam actually
had and used WMDs.
So how about you actually address the points made in the article as well as some of Roberts’ other wacko writings? Our president is Hitler, there’s a CIA plot behind Human watch groups to sow fighting among Muslims, Assad doesn’t have chemical weapons, and Osama is still alive?
You do basically see that everything the author has written about the US lying and Assad not having and using weapons has been proven untrue by Russia and Syria itself in the past 2 weeks right?
It’s not strawman argument and ad hominem argumentation to call this guy a wacko if his nonfactual writings and points of view really are “wacko”.
I really wish it were possible to kick people like him on the far left and far right, and Muslim and Christian religious nuts out of the country. Please go to Russia where apparently they have a free and democratic society as long as you’re not a homo, listen to ‘Pussy Riot’ or actually practice open journalism. Or better yet Syria – I hear they have good Air quality, and I’m sure there’s no fluoridated water there.
It has not been conclusively determined which party used CW.
The use of force by the US against Syria would amount to aggression, “the supreme international crime” as defined at Nuremberg. Nazis were also hanged not only for committing, but for conspiring to commit, aggression; thus, Obama is a war criminal simply for planning this attack, which is also a violation of the UN Charter.
You criticize Russia and China for not having “democratic goals” and Russia for arming Syria. Yet seem not to apply this standard equally, offering no criticisms of the US for not having democratic goals and for arming the rebels whose ranks include al Qaeda.
‘It’s not strawman argument and ad hominem argumentation to call this guy a wacko if his nonfactual writings and points of view really are “wacko”.’
By the same measure, Dr. Roberts is not engaging in ad hominem argumentation to ask you what kind of brainwashed idiot you are. The fact that you consider it “tin foil hat” territory to say we shouldn’t drink water containing a known neurotoxin says all we need to know about your suggestion the point of the article is to “lob conspiracy theories”. You didn’t answer my question. You do know that fluoride is a neurotoxin, right? Well, anyways, you do now.
Do you know what triangulation is? To systematically identify and backtrack the azimuths that lead to a certain originating locus? I think over the course of this little troll war I’ve been having with you in the comments section the past week we are finally starting to lock in on your specific position. Your specific conspiracy laden, tinfoil hat wearing, crazy position. That “idiotic argument rock” I lobbed about fluoridated water seems to have hit a certain brand of crazy sheep! Baaaaah!
By your responses we might easily establish a profile of your beliefs and positions, one that attracts website readers who are confused by the pleasantness and well spoken intelligence of Assad (you’re easily impressed by the way Dan P Mullen), others, like Roberts, who hold America as the pinnacle of all evil – “the great Satan” to quote another anti-US leader he would no doubt side with against America, and others like yourself who by your own writings could dare to compare Obama trying to establish universal healthcare on the level enjoyed by many other progressive countries in the world here in America to the painful institution of slavery. On second thought, maybe you’re right about the Obamacare analogy, because whenever I visit Canada and look around at all the indentured Canadians in chains who were stolen by force from another country, with scars on the back, their families torn apart and sold off, their women raped, and the men lynched by racists all being forced to work under the yoke of socialism my first thought is “geez let’s fight back against the Nazis in our government trying to establish healthcare for everyone”.
You lob that N-word against Obama frequently (no, not that N-word, the other – “Nazi”) just like Ted Cruz, but I don’t think you’re conservative right-wing wacko bird out to shoot down whatever is perceived as liberal. No, you’re more of a Rand and Ron Paul type weirdo who would argue against sensible gun control because any limits on gun-control or take away your freedom. Opposition for arguments sake. I can almost guarantee that you’re a fan of Ayn Rand and had a Chairman Mao poster on your wall in high school. There is no doubt that you are a “truther” who somehow believes that 9/11 was a government orchestrated conspiracy. You’re also clearly in the camp who believes that there is an imminent threat of this US “regieme” using drone strikes against American citizens within the US as Paul does. And clearly you’ve got a problem with fluoride in our water which is a documented belief for a method of mind control by many Libertarian nut jobs! Sure fluoride is a neurotoxin, but how many years have we been using it and what is the outcome you worried about? If you’ve ever been to a foreign country in South America, southeast Asia or the Middle East where they don’t treat the water and seen people’s teeth, then you might realize it’s not such a bad trade-off – you know what I’ll risk whatever insidious mind control plot you’re afraid of to have more than three teeth left in my mouth by the time I hit 30 years old.
Enough about you and back to the original wackiness of the article I posted on. When you originally wrote to me you told me not to call names, however, that’s all Mr. Roberts is capable of doing in the various articles posted on this site. According to the good Dr., all Obama wants to do is illegally sow war, aggression, and misery in the Middle East Which I find highly ironic since he was a part of the administration responsible for illegally sowing so much war aggression and misery in the Middle East is part of the Reagan administration. Remember Iran-Contra? Wow wasn’t Roberts a part of the government/military industrial complex administration literally led by a chicken hawk Hollywood actor that flooded the middle east and supplied weapons to the pre-Taliban Mujahedin?
You’re so worried about Obama in the Middle East but ask Roberts of his involvement with the right wing CIA backed death squads South America? You know proven CIA backed and trained death squads, unlike the human rights organizations working not only in the Middle East but other impoverished underdeveloped countries around the world, which Roberts seems to think is a CIA front. Funny how he now lauds Putin as some sort of highly intelligent altruistic thinking democratic world statesmen, when in reality the exK-GB keeps the stream of weapons flowing to the Middle East just like the American military complex does as well- really just the Russian flipside of his CIA American bogeyman. I think Roberts dost protest too much against the US government and gush on behalf Putin – could it be that behind his garrulous diatribe against Obama what’s really at work here is Roberts’ desire to strip off that sweet Tuxedo he’s wearing in his profile picture and, now shirtless, hop onto the back of Vladimir’s stallion and wrap his hands around the world leader’s waist, as they ride off into the Russian wilds, as they ride Roberts cupping his Putin’s balls of course? Oh yeah and he also thinks Osama is still alive.
Well I grow tired of this little ongoing post battle – full disclosure I used to be a social worker and work with the chronically mentally ill and I feel I am being pulled back into the various paranoid conversations I was forced to listen to with my schizophrenic clients. Fortunately I can unsubscribe from your blog’s email list. But what you should actually do – and I say this out of not only genuine concern for you but concern for the direction our country is headed – please take a break from your blog manifesto, go look in the mirror and reassess your beliefs, while asking yourself the following questions:
A) What’s more concerning to me – fluoride in the water or the actual real threat of global warming and its effects as established by nearly be entire scientific community?
B) Instead of comparing Universal Health care to slavery, maybe I should look at some progressive countries who have efficient healthcare systems, and and question whether It would be a personal benefit to myself if a government I pay taxes to already would benefit me while personally for establishing a universal system you know like Medicare?
C) Well I should not take with the media or my government says without question doesn’t make sense for me to weigh the evidence that’s out there and make an informed decision about who actually used chemical weapons?
D) And furthermore, mirror Jeremy, maybe I should put into context that this whole Syria civil War was sparked initially by Assad’s Military clampdown on the Muslims who wanted self-determined freedom from the western backed and supported dictators in the Arab Spring the first place? – You know the same Muslims who I rail against the US government potentially killing in a Zionist Obama plot, rather than actually showing any outrage or sympathy for the thousands of civilians who have been caught in the crossfire and died a chemical gas attack, similar to the gas weapons that actual Hitler (not Obama Hitler) actually used?
So in conclusion if you agree that trying to establish universal healthcare is a government socialist takeover, that Assad is not responsible for chemical weapons attacks, that fluoridated water is of greater concern than the actual environmental pollution unregulated corporations get away with, that Osama is still alive, the moon-landing was false, or that our president is somehow anyway similar to the Nazi regime, you really need to reevaluate your life. You ascribing to these conspiracy theories of Roberts is a big waste of time and of energy. Wouldn’t your life be better served if you actually went out and worked for a cause instead of pushing conspiracy to other wingnut on the Internet? How about the country? Scary, mean old N-word Obama will be gone in four years, but meanwhile you can volunteer for your local church, synagogue, or mosque, the YMCA, Big brothers Mentoring program, tutor inner city youth, help clean up the environment, donate your time to the Wounded Warriors program, help out your local animal shelter, run a 10K in support of your FOP, support an NGO which fosters international aide, teach gun safety to kids, support your local civic programs, join the Guardian angels, blog about equal rights for gays, join your local community board, or preach traditional family values in a nonjudgmental or repressive way if that’s how you feel – All of these options are available to you which will help ameliorate the country rather than reinforce the right wing Rand Paul/Ted Cruz Libertarian “crazy train” which also bears a remarkable resemblance and parallelism to ultra-left Muslim extremist, racist/supremacist groups, and plain paranoid movement groups and the undercurrents of the internet.
Come on Mr. Hammond – back away from the computer, leave all 300 notebooks of your handwritten manifesto in the basement, and live! If you can’t do that, please move to Syria and go be with your compatriots. If all you’re going to do is rail against the US without providing a solutions or intelligible arguments on how to make the country better, please let’s give your spot here in the US to an undocumented Mexican, political refugee, or some other illegal alien – wait, scratch “illegal alien” I’d rather give your spot to an actual alien – yes, an actual extraterrestrial alien. Rather than bitch about how bad and evil our country is why don’t you actually do something to make it better?
Ignoring your lengthy strawman and ad hominem fallacies (final warning about this violation of terms of use for the comments section) and addressing your few actual arguments:
Yes, I know what “triangulation” is, but evidently you do not; the UN investigators did not use “triangulation” to determine where the CW rockets had come from.
Fluoride works topically, not systemically. It violates the most elementary medical ethics to medicate people without their consent and without being able to control the dosage, which is all the more egregious given that in this case the treatment is to use a neurotoxin that has been linked with lowering IQ.
One can be concerned about the dangers of fluoridating the water supply as well as global warming. One needn’t treat these issues as mutually exclusive when it comes to having concern.
Dr. Roberts being a part of the Reagan administration does not preclude him from criticizing the Bush and Obama administrations for their crimes.
Recognizing the evils of the US and educating others about it is the necessary first step to making it better. It is difficult to see how the problems can be solved without undertaking this prerequisite.