During October 19-22, 2010, Charles Rivkin, US Ambassador to France, invited a 29-member delegation from the Pacific Council on International Policy (PCIP) to a conference in France, the stated purpose of which was to discuss Arab and Islamic relations in the country.[1] The meeting was part of a far-reaching subversive agenda to transform that entire character of France and in particular the consciousness of French youth, which includes the use of France’s Muslim youth in a typically manipulative globalist strategy behind the usual façade of “human rights” and “equality.”
Globalist Delegation at US Embassy
The PCIP report states of the conference:
…The delegation further focused on three key themes. First, the group examined Franco-Muslim issues in France through exchanges with Dr. Bassma Kodmani, Director of the Arab Reform Institute, and Ms. Rachida Dati, the first female French cabinet member of North African origin and current Mayor of the 7th Arrondissement in Paris. A trip to the Grand Mosque of Paris and a meeting with the Director of Theology and the Rector there provided additional insight. Second, meetings with Mr. Jean-Noel Poirier, the Vice President of External Affairs at AREVA (a highly innovative French energy company), and with Mr. Brice Lalonde, climate negotiator and former Minister of the Environment, highlighted energy and nuclear policy issues and the differences between U.S. and French policies in these arenas. And finally, the delegation explored the connections between media and culture in California (Hollywood) and France in meetings at the Louvre, the Musee D’Orsay, and at FRANCE 24 – the Paris-based international news and current affairs channel.[2]
The over-riding concern seems to have been on matters of a multicultural dimension, including not only Arab and Islamic relations in France, but perhaps more importantly in the long term, a discussion on the impact of Hollywood “culture” on the French.
The USA has long played a duplicitous game of “fighting terrorism” of an “Islamic” nature as one of the primary elements of its post-Cold War stratagem of manufactured permanent crises, while using “radical Islam” for it own purposes, the well-known examples being: (1) supporting Bin Laden in the war against Russia in Afghanistan; (2) backing Saddam Hussein in the war against Iran; (3) supporting the Kosovo Liberation Army in ousting the Serbs from mineral-rich Kosovo, the KLA having been miraculously transformed from being listed by the US State Department as a “terrorist organization,” to becoming “freedom fighters.”
When US globalists pose as friends of Muslims, the latter should sup with the Great Shaitan with an exceedingly long spoon.
What is the Pacific Council on International Policy?
The PCIP, of which Rivkin is a member, was founded in 1995 as a regional appendage of the omnipresent globalist think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),[3] It is headquartered in Los Angeles, but “with members and activities throughout the West Coast of the United States and internationally.” Corporate funding comes from, among others:
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations
City National Bank
The Ford Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
The Rockefeller Foundation
United States Institute of Peace [4]
The PCIP is therefore yet another big player in the globalist network comprising hundreds of interconnected organizations, lobbies, “civil society” groups, NGOs, and think tanks, associated the US Government, and with banks and other corporations. As usual, there is a conspicuous presence by Rockefeller interests, and the interesting character, Nicky Rockefeller, is a member, despite the insistence of some “skeptics” that he doesn’t actually exist.
Why France?
France has long been a thorn in the side of US globalism because of its stubborn adherence to French interests around the world, rather than those of the manufactured “world community.” Despite Sarkozy, France is one of the few states left in Western Europe with the remnant of a national consciousness. The best way of destroying any such sentiment is to weaken the concepts of nationhood and nationality by means of promoting “multiculturalism.” Was it only a coincidence that the 1968 student revolt, sparked by the most puerile of reasons, occurred at a time both when the CIA was very active in funding student groups around the world, and when President De Gaulle was giving the USA a lot of trouble? De Gaulle did little to play along with American’s post-war plans. He withdrew France from NATO military command. Even during World War II as leader of the Free French, he was distrusted by the USA.[5] Of particular concern would have been De Gaulle’s advocacy of a united Europe to counteract US hegemony.[6] In 1959 he stated at Strasbourg: “Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the destiny of the world.” The expression implied détente between a future neutralist Europe and the USSR. In 1967 he declared an arms embargo on Israel and cultivated the Arab world. This is the type of statesmanship that globalists fear. With the buffoonery of Sarkozy, and mounting tension with disaffected Muslim youth, a backlash could see an intransigently anti-globalist, “xenophobic” regime come to power. In today’s context, what better way now to subvert French nationalism and head-off any potential to revive as an anti-globalist force, than to use France’s large, unassimilated Islamic component, just as the Bolshevik revolution was undertaken to a significant extent by the disaffected minorities of the Russian Empire?
Of interest also is the interest of the PCIP delegation in the influence of Hollywood on French culture. This might seem at first glance to be an odd concern. However Hollywood, as the symbol of international cultural excrescence, is an important factor in globalization, in what amounts to a world culture-war. Ultimately the goal of globalism is not to promote the survival of ethnic cultures and identities, but rather to submerge them into one big melting pot of global consumerism, to uproot every individual from an identity and heritage and replace that with the global shopping mall, and the “global village.” Therefore multiculturalism should be viewed as the antithesis of what it is understood as being. So far from the global corporates wanting to promote so-called multiculturalism in terms of assuring the existence of a multiplicity of cultures, as the term implies; it is to the contrary part of a dialectical process whereby under the facade of humane ideals, peoples of vastly different heritage are moved across the world like pawns on a chess board. It is an example of Orwellian “doublethink.”[7] It is notable that the instigators of the “velvet revolutions” now sweeping North Africa and reaching into Iran are largely “secularized” youths without strong traditional roots. Similarly, the best way to solve France’s ethnic conflicts and to assure that France does not re-emerge again to confront US/globalist interests, is to dialectically create a new cultural synthesis where there is neither a French culture nor an Islamic culture, but under the banner of “human rights” and “equality,” a globalist youth-based culture nurtured by Hollywood, MTV, cyberspace, MacDonald’s and Pepsi. That this is more than hypothesis is indicated in the manner by which the secular youth revolts now taking place in North Africa have been spawned by an alliance of corporate interests, sponsored by the US State Department and sundry NGOs such as Freedom House.[8] The North African “revolutionaries” are just the type of “Muslim” that the globalists prefer; spawned and nurtured with the cyber-consumer mentality.
So what are Rivkin and the US State Department up to in France, that they should be so interested in the place of Hollywood and of Muslims in the country?
Every single person in France should read this article… I am desperately watching my country die and rot from the inside and it hurts.
Fabian is right. Every person in France should read this article. If French people wants to see the furture for themselves they could lookk
at Ireland where multiculturalism (or should I say monoculturalism/consumerism) began in the 1960’s with the Hollywood/Nashville culture and is now the accepted doctine propounded by all politicians and the media and dare anyone with a different view open thei mouth.
there is a french translation on a french blog :
http://www.defrancisation.com/le-projet-rivkin-comment-la-mondialisation-utilise-le-multiculturalisme-pour-assujettir-des-nations-souveraines/
Fabian,
You are not alone to suffer seeing France in such a state. But this article is spreading around and explains a lot. If those stinking people truly believe French and Europeans will be destroyed without moving a finger, they could meet with a hard and bad surprise.
Keep on hoping, even desesperately, resistance is showing up.
Being a fench citizen and former political elected from 1983 to 1995 i agree with the contain of this article, when i was a teen ager i had for the United States a relationship based on the role of that country in defeating the german third Reich and to me thesev are not words because one of my uncle was one of these kids who caame to fight in my country.
My opinion on us policy turned from favorable to completely opposed, Uncle’s Sam is no more an exemple, all the Wars of these fourty last years were a dishonest practice to sustain Israel in his hegemonic wievs, to manipulate the need for democracy in arabo-islamic world to get rid of many leaders who have been supported for decades.
My major reason to negate us pretention to lead the world is the way they act on financial matters, the IMF has been for years the main reason for hugue drastics cuts in third world couuntries mainly in Africa and now the cuts on eupopean countries while in the mean time the american economy is supported by the asiatic excedents of Japan during the eighties, China for this decade.
This policy is no longer acceptable there are no reason for the States to make other countries pay for their laxism and the speech about fighting for Liberty and Democracy is just bullshit . In fact the system is in hidden bankrupcy and it can’t be solved whitout an iconoclast measure of withdrawing the dolar as a reserve money, not any of american leaders will accept that but european countries will fight for that result otherwise the economical war will cause mlore dammage than WWII.
You are right Jean, those oligarchs are criminals.
But they are making huge mistakes and World will soon find out how to use so pretty stupid mistakes. Also, more than half of the World is hating not all Americans but those financial murderers as well as they hate the corrupted ones of their own countries. Will perhaps take a bit of time, but they will shed blood tears sooner than expected. Don’t say there won’t be any casualties, but they will have a very high price to pay. Meanwhile I can tell you that in my home Coca is banished as well as every american thing we can replace by European goods. That’s also a way to strike back, hit their wallet!
The article and comments give insight to the motives of global capitilcontrolled by US Impriist forces. Please forward more materials and articles as I am very much interested to understand the intrigues to change the ethnic , national and cultural identities of various peoples and nations. Express our solidarity.
Whatever is true in this characterization of the path French society is taking is undercut by the silliness of sating that a US diplomat has some responsibility for it. Rivkin did what an endless parade of French Bobos have done before him since the 1970s making specious arguments that international relations are interlaced with community relations.
The effect discussed has been taking place since the 80’s, and began in the mid-60’s for goodness’ sake.
So it’s no more no less than the Kalergi plan
Yup.
effing k|kes.
And Hitler was a ‘bad person”? Gimme a break.
Charles (((Rivken)))
Duly Noted. Every. Single Time.
This is the same as Jews bragging about controlling/subverting Egypt & Babylon ……. their entire history is that of parasitically attaching to healthy hosts and feeding.
Political Correctness was an intentional “invention” of socialists at the Frankfurt School back around 1930 to bring Marxist social conventions into mainstream society. Political Correctness has been accurately described as Cultural Marxism. Yes. PC is indeed a Marxist tool of conquest.
“Political Correctness” is a Jewish YOKE on the necks&mind of Christian Gentiles.
Any Bible reader knows what a YOKE is, and how the Jews brag about placing YOKES on Egypt and Babylon. The “holocaust” is a YOKE on the minds of Western Christians.
Slaves are not “allowed” to have opinions, beliefs, or thoughts.
Slaves are just supposed to unquestioningly do the bidding of the master .
THAT is what Political Correctness is, the YOKING/enslavement of the Gentiles.
Make the Goyim afraid to speak a word, or think a thought.
Why did Christian Spain throw the Jews out the day after the last muslim was expelled?
Because the Jews “played both sides” for 700 years of Christian oppression.
Jews instigated the pogroms against Christians in Rome.
Jewish Bolsevicks genocided TWENTY MILLION Ukrainian Christians in the Holomodor.
What the globalists are doing to destroy sovereign Nations such as America is exactly what they have learned from studying their Jewish history. The nations of Babylon and Assyria both used similar methodologies to accomplish the same goals and this is the elite globalist central bankster’s plot against the Nations of the world. The vatican has even joined them in this satanic venture. Read Revelation chapter 13 to find out more.