<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Foreign Policy Journal &#187; Editorial</title> <atom:link href="http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/category/op-ed/editorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com</link> <description>World news, political analysis, and opinion commentary</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Ron Paul: Propagandist or Prophet?</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/24/ron-paul-propagandist-or-prophet/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/24/ron-paul-propagandist-or-prophet/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=13956</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ron Paul is “the best-known American propagandist for our enemies”, writes Dorothy Rabinowitz in a recent Wall Street Journal hit piece. To support the charge, she writes that Dr. Paul “assures audiences” that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 “took place only because of U.S. aggression and military actions”. It’s “True,” she writes, that “we’ve heard [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/24/ron-paul-propagandist-or-prophet/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>157</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>David Frum: Saving America from Ron Paul</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/16/david-frum-saving-america-from-ron-paul/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/16/david-frum-saving-america-from-ron-paul/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:40:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=13868</guid> <description><![CDATA[David Frum, the Bush speechwriter who wrote Dubya’s “Axis of Evil” line, doesn’t like Ron Paul for president, and doesn’t think you should, either. He makes a pretty convincing case. Let’s look. Paul is “a boutique candidate, appealing to a very particular fringe within the GOP.” Yes, we wouldn’t want to vote for a “fringe” [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/16/david-frum-saving-america-from-ron-paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Paul Krugman vs. Ron Paul and Friedrich Hayek</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/09/17/paul-krugman-vs-ron-paul-and-friedrich-hayek/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/09/17/paul-krugman-vs-ron-paul-and-friedrich-hayek/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=13227</guid> <description><![CDATA[Paul Krugman tried to slam Ron Paul in his most recent column by writing: Back in 1980, just as America was making its political turn to the right, Milton Friedman lent his voice to the change with the famous TV series “Free to Choose.” In episode after episode, the genial economist identified laissez-faire economics with [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/09/17/paul-krugman-vs-ron-paul-and-friedrich-hayek/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>110</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What Would Paul Krugman Do?</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/08/30/what-would-paul-krugman-do/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/08/30/what-would-paul-krugman-do/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:58:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=12908</guid> <description><![CDATA[WWPKD? Much more than Ben Bernanke has done. In a recent New York Times op-ed, Krugman criticizes the Federal Reserve chairman following his much-anticipated Jackson Hole announcement for not doing enough to reduce unemployment and foster economic growth. But he spares Bernanke his strongest criticism, which he reserves for the “political intimidation” that has caused [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/08/30/what-would-paul-krugman-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>34</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Future Is Palestine</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/07/20/the-future-is-palestine/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/07/20/the-future-is-palestine/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Israel / Palestine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=12506</guid> <description><![CDATA[Special to the Palestine Chronicle. The U.S. has long opposed any “unilateral” action on the part of the Palestinians to seek fulfillment of their right to self-determination, and there is a very real threat that if the Palestinian Authority goes to the United Nations in September seeking international recognition of Palestinian statehood, the U.S. will [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/07/20/the-future-is-palestine/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>It&#8217;s Well Past Time to Start Taking Peak Oil Seriously</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/27/its-well-past-time-to-start-taking-peak-oil-seriously/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/27/its-well-past-time-to-start-taking-peak-oil-seriously/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:54:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category> <category><![CDATA[World]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=8900</guid> <description><![CDATA[Michael Lind writes a top-9 list of &#8220;most annoying sky-is-falling clichés in American foreign policy&#8221; under the headline &#8220;So Long, Chicken Little&#8221; in the March/April issue of Foreign Policy, with his second pick being, &#8220;The world must adapt quickly to the end of fossil fuels&#8221;, including the advent of Peak Oil. He characterizes Peak Oil [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/27/its-well-past-time-to-start-taking-peak-oil-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Rejoinder to ‘Is UN Creation of Israel a Myth? Ask Foreign Policy Journal’</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/28/rejoinder-to-is-un-creation-of-israel-a-myth-ask-foreign-policy-journal/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/28/rejoinder-to-is-un-creation-of-israel-a-myth-ask-foreign-policy-journal/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Israel / Palestine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=8008</guid> <description><![CDATA[In sum, neither INN nor Dr. Nisan have managed to point to even a single error in either fact or logic on my part in my essay. The facts are as I have stated them, and the logical conclusions drawn inescapable.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/28/rejoinder-to-is-un-creation-of-israel-a-myth-ask-foreign-policy-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>On Refusing Apology for the Nuking of Civilians</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/07/on-refusing-apology-for-the-nuking-of-civilians/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/07/on-refusing-apology-for-the-nuking-of-civilians/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:37:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=6926</guid> <description><![CDATA[Japan on Friday marked the 65th anniversary of the nuclear bomb attack on Hiroshima. U.S. Ambassador John V. Roos attended the annual ceremony that marks the event. It was the first time a U.S. official had done so. The New York Times explains the reason: Until Friday, American officials had always skipped the annual ceremony, [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/07/on-refusing-apology-for-the-nuking-of-civilians/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>There Is No Two-State Solution</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/07/21/there-is-no-two-state-solution/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/07/21/there-is-no-two-state-solution/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:46:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Israel / Palestine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=6840</guid> <description><![CDATA[The two-state solution is dead. There is no longer any hope for peace or justice in this solution, if there ever was to begin with.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/07/21/there-is-no-two-state-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Washington Post on &#8216;lunatic&#8217; 9/11 &#8216;conspiracy theorists&#8217;</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/03/09/the-washington-post-on-lunatic-911-conspiracy-theorists/</link> <comments>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/03/09/the-washington-post-on-lunatic-911-conspiracy-theorists/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:44:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy R. Hammond</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeremy R. Hammond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[United States]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=3468</guid> <description><![CDATA[Surely, that proper credible investigations into the events of 9/11 should occur -- indeed, should have occurred long ago -- should also be non-controversial, no matter which conspiracy theory one believes, whether it comes from "the lunatic fringe" or to the U.S. government.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/03/09/the-washington-post-on-lunatic-911-conspiracy-theorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>41</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.foreignpolicyjournal.com @ 2012-02-08 12:55:49 by W3 Total Cache -->
