Manipulating History: The Different Faces of ‘Popular Resistance’ in Palestine

Apparently, ‘popular resistance’ has suddenly elevated to become a clash of visions or strategies between the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah and its rivals in Gaza, underscoring an existing and deepening rift between various factions and leaderships.

Addressing a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) meeting in Ramallah on July 2011, PA President Mahmoud Abbas sounded as if he had finally reached an earth shattering conclusion, supposedly inspired by the ‘Arab Spring.’ “In this coming period, we want mass action, organized and coordinated in every place…. This is a chance to raise our voices in front of the world and say that we want our rights.” He called on Palestinians to wage “popular resistance”, insisting that it must be “unarmed popular resistance so that nobody misunderstands us” (Reuters). He made a similar call at the UN General Assembly in September.

The de facto Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose term expired in January 2009, claimed authority to extend his own term. (Mohamad Torokman/Reuters)It was Abbas’ way of escaping forward. He needed to quell the mounting anger and resentment of his lacking leadership. His message targeted and continues to be aimed at dual audiences: Palestinians, thus the word “resistance” and international, thus ‘non-violence’ and “so that nobody misunderstand us.”

Abbas has little credibility as far as unleashing any form of resistance against Israel. Since its establishment in 1994 as a transitional body that would guide Palestinians towards independence, the PA has turned into an end in itself: dedicated to self-preservation, it means even conspiring with the Israeli government to manage the very occupation that has tormented Palestinians for over 45 years. Indeed, ‘security coordination’ between both sides predicates on the common understanding of silencing any dissent that would imperil the PA standing or how it is perceived by Israel as a security threat.

There is little if any evidence that the PA is leading a sincere ‘mass action, organized and coordinated in every place’. The PA-staged rhetorical revolution however served its purpose, at least for now, as Abbas and his men survived the regional upheaval.

The term, ‘popular resistance’ though is still being generously infused as if its mere repetition is a key to solving every political dichotomy facing Palestinians. The context in which it is used or manipulated is registering unfavorably among Palestinian factions that have long championed armed struggle and vehemently opposed Oslo and its institutions. Particularly irked by Abbas’ version is the Islamic Jihad in Gaza.

When Islamic Jihad Secretary General Ramadan Shallah addressed thousands of supporters in Gaza in celebration of the 31st anniversary of the movement’s founding, he addressed this very issue. He called for a new national strategy, underscoring the failure of the so-called peace process. “The Palestinian project of establishing a state on the 1967 borders through negotiations has obviously failed,” he said.

Of course he also lashed out at ‘peaceful non-violent resistance’ which provided very useful sound bites quoted generously by the media. Interestingly, however, Shallah’s views on non-violent popular resistance were combined with his views on negotiations, thus interpreting the strategy of popular resistance as part and parcel of the PA’s futile hunt for ‘Israeli concessions’. “Nineteen years of failed negotiations have created a crisis which cannot be resolved by insisting on more negotiations, or through non-violent resistance,” he said, according to the Palestinian Ma’an News Agency (October 04).

A third and less factional reading of the popular resistance strategy was offered by the ever-articulate Palestinian activist Dr. Mostafa Barghouti, who was clear on Al Jazeera (October 18) when he defended Palestinians’ rights to resist by all means available, but asserted that popular resistance can be a more effective strategy at achieving political rights.

Obviously, the problem doesn’t exist within the non-violent popular resistance strategy itself, but its political contextualization and misuse by certain parties. When placed within a truly genuine framework aimed at devising a conducive and beneficial strategy for obtaining Palestinian rights, popular-resistance takes on a different look and feel altogether. Moreover, as far as Palestinian history is concerned, the strategy is hardly an alien concept or a defeatist attempt at not being ‘misunderstood’ by western benefactors.

History is rife with evidence. In September 19, 1989, the West Bank town of Beit Sahour led a campaign of popular resistance and civil disobedience that became the stuff of legends. It was an effort that was part of the awe-inspiring and massive mobilization of the First Palestinian Uprising (1987-1993). Numerous attempts failed to break the collective will of Beit Sahour. The Israeli government moved its military in full force, launching ‘the biggest taxation raid in recent history’: occupation forces moved in en masse, and tax collectors worked their magic, confiscating all that they could seize. Many families were left with nothing. Most of the confiscated furniture and other personal belongings were sold at auctions inside Israel. The small town fell under a forty-five day military curfew that started on the night of September 21. Hundreds of Beit Sahour residents were taken to military camps and many remained in prison under various excuses.  The Israeli military may have thought it won a decisive battle, but on that day a star near Bethlehem shone in the night sky of Palestine. It connected past and present inspiring hope that people, despite the many years of military occupation, still had much power. It had even enough power for a small town to vex the leaders of Israel’s political and military establishments.

The story of popular resistance in Palestine is a century old. However, its origins are often dated to 1936, when Palestinians, Muslims and Christians, rebelled against the Zionist colonial drive and the British role in espousing it and laboring to ensure its success. In April 1936, all five Palestinian political parties joined in under the umbrella of the Arab Higher Committee (AHC). That unity was pressing and was a reflection of the general attitude among ordinary Palestinians. A general strike was declared, ushering the start of Palestine’s legendary civil disobedience campaign – as exemplified in its cry of ‘No Taxation without Representation’. The 1936 uprising sent a stern message to the British government that Palestinians were nationally unified and capable of acting as an assertive, self-assured society in ways that could indeed disturb the matrix of British mandatory rule over the country. The British administration in Palestine had thus far discounted the Palestinian demand for independence and paid little attention to their grave concerns about the rising menace of Zionism and its colonial project.

Of course these are not distant histories. That collective action was hardly a passing phase, but was repeated throughout history, even after the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993, which institutionalized the Israeli occupation and ruthlessly punished those who dared resist.

The PA in Ramallah should quit utilizing and referencing the notion of ‘popular resistance’ while doing everything in its power to suppress it; and Abbas’ rivals must not associate popular resistance with Oslo and its bankrupt institutions, for history can easily delink that distorted connection. Popular resistance in Palestine continues to exist not because of the Palestinian leadership but despite it.

Ramzy Baroud

Homepage
Ramzy Baroud
Ramzy Baroud is a PhD scholar in People’s History at the University of Exeter. He is the Managing Editor of Middle East Eye. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London). 

3 Responses to "Manipulating History: The Different Faces of ‘Popular Resistance’ in Palestine"

  1. servocad  November 4, 2012 at 8:05 pm

    Mr.Baroud is forgetting some crucial points concerning the Land of Israel:
    -so-called “Paletinians”are simply Arabs;there is, and has never been,any such thing as “Palestine”,no “palestinian”state, language,religion, script,or distinct culture.All these things are part of a description of a nation.
    -Arabs, as their very name indicates, are landrobbers( they robbed the Land of Israel in the 7th century) from Arabia, and that’s where they should go, to their ancient land.
    -The Land of Israel was never Arab or “Palestinian” although it was( and partly still is) ilegally occupied by Arabs and the time has come to finally end that occupation.
    -Arab terror against the Jews who returned to the land of their fathers is about 130 years old.
    -no “Palestinian” “resistance” will have any effect upon Israel;it will only once again make the lives of Arabs miserable.They are unable to survive without economic ties with Israel which provides them with virtually everything-jobs, electricity, gas, oil, export/import facilities etc…
    Mr.Marwan Barghouti is a certified murderer responsible of murdering at least 75 Israelis and he will stay in jail for the rest of his life.In a more civilized country like USA he would have been sentenced to death-as he deserves.
    Finally-Mr.Baroud should make his home work in recent history of the Middle east unless he preferes to disseminate antisemitic lies and propaganda.

    Reply
    • Jeremy R. Hammond
      Jeremy R. Hammond  November 5, 2012 at 12:04 pm

      Palestinians are real people, just as Palestine is a real historical place. Racist comments and ad hominem slanders will not be tolerated. Only warning.

      Reply
  2. Mike Thompson  November 7, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    The original Hebrew tribe were Arabs (from Iraq), Abraham was an Arab, Moses was an Arab, King David (Daud)was an Arab, as was his son Solomon (Suleman), they all worshiped one god. Jesus of Nazereth was a Palestinian Jewish Arab (No one knows how Hebrew became Jewish, but who`s worried about that!), who`s followers created the Christian Faith, Mohamed was also (funnily enough) an Arab.

    Palestinians were originally known as Canaanites, and the Romans used the word Palestine some 2,000 years ago. The French were known as Gauls at that time, but it makes them no less the original inhabitants to now call them French.

    Palestinian Arab DNA establishes the long occupation of that people in the Levant, no such DNA exists for most of the inhabitants of Israel, in particular Benjamin Netanyahu has no semite DNA, rather his ancestors dwelt hundreds of miles north of Palestine.

    The true descendants of the people of the Kingdom of Israel are the Palestinians, most of whom converted to Christianity, then Islam. North and East Europeans have no historical links to Palestine save a religious conviction.

    Reply

Join the Discussion