The Rivkin Project for Subverting French Youth
That year (2010), when Rivkin had invited a delegation of fellow PCIP members to France, he had outlined a program for the Americanization of France that primarily involved the use of the Muslim minorities and the indoctrination of French youth with corporate globalist ideals. The slogan invoked was the common commitment France and America historically had to “equality.” Wikileaks released the “confidential” Rivkin program. It is entitled “Minority Engagement Strategy.”[9] Here, Rivkin outlines a program that is a far-reaching interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign nation and, more profoundly, seeks to change the attitudes of generations of Muslim and French youth so that they might be merged into a new globalist synthesis; or what might be called a new humanity: Homo economicus, or what the financial analyst G Pascal Zachary calls “The Global Me,”[10] to achieve what Rivkin describes as USA’s “national interests.” Rivkin begins by stating that his Embassy has created a “Minority Engagement Strategy,” that is directed at Muslims in France. Rivikin states as part of the program: “…We will also integrate the efforts of various Embassy sections, target influential leaders among our primary audiences, and evaluate both tangible and intangible indicators of the success of our strategy.”[11]
Rivkin is confident that France’s history of ideological liberalism “will serve us well as we implement the strategy outlined here… in which we press France….” Note the phrase: “press France”. America’s global agenda is linked by Rivkin to his blueprint for transferring France into “a thriving, inclusive French polity [that] will help advance our interests in expanding democracy and increasing stability worldwide.” The program will focus on the “elites” of the French and the Muslim communities, but will also involve a massive propaganda campaign directed at the “general population,” with a focus on the young.
The program also includes redefining French history in the school curricula to give attention to the role of non-French minorities in French history. It means that the Pepsi/MTV generation of Americans and their mentors in academe will be formulating new definitions of French culture and writing new pages of French history to accord with globalist agendas. Towards this end: “…we will continue and intensify our work with French museums and educators to reform the history curriculum taught in French schools.”
“Tactic Number Three” is entitled: “Launch Aggressive Youth Outreach.” As in other states targeted by the US State Department and their allies at the Soros network, Freedom House, Movement.org, National Endowment for Democracy, Solidarity Center,[12] and so forth; disaffected youth are the focus for change. Leading the charge on this effort, the Ambassador’s inter-agency Youth Outreach Initiative aims to “engender a positive dynamic among French youth that leads to greater support for U.S. objectives and values.” Can the intentions be stated any plainer? It is Americanization culturally and politically. It is here that we can most easily get past the cant and see what is behind the strategy: to form a generation “that leads to greater support for U.S. objectives and values” (sic). These “U.S. objectives and values” will be sold to the French as “French values” on the basis of the bourgeoisie ideals of 1789 which continue to encumber French ideology on both Left and Right. The young French will be taught to think that they are upholding French traditions, rather than acting as the useful idiots of Americanization, and concomitant banality of the global shopping mall. A far-reaching program incorporating a variety of indoctrination methods is outlined:
To achieve these aims, we will build on the expansive Public Diplomacy programs already in place at post, and develop creative, additional means to influence the youth of France, employing new media, corporate partnerships, nationwide competitions, targeted outreach events, especially invited U.S. guests. [13]
The program directed at youth in France is similar to that directed at the youth that formed the vanguard of the “velvet revolutions” from Eastern Europe to North Africa. Potential leaders are going to be taken up by the US State Department in France and cultivated to play a part in the future France of American design:
We will also develop new tools to identify, learn from, and influence future French leaders.
As we expand training and exchange opportunities for the youth of France, we will continue to make absolutely certain that the exchanges we support are inclusive.
We will build on existing youth networks in France, and create new ones in cyberspace, connecting France’s future leaders to each other in a forum whose values we help to shape — values of inclusion, mutual respect, and open dialogue.[14]
Here Rivkin is advocating something beyond influencing Muslims in France. He is stating that a significant part of the program will be directed towards cultivating French youth, the potential leaders, in “American” ideals, under the façade of French ideals. The US State Department and their corporate allies and allied NGOs intend to “shape their values.” The globalist program for France is stated clearly enough to be the re-education of French youth. One would think that this is the most important role of the French Government, the Catholic Church and the family; the latter two in particular.
As in the states that are chosen for “velvet revolutions” part of the strategy includes demarcating acceptable political boundaries. As Hillary Clinton recently stated in regard to the type of state the US Establishment expects to emerge after Qaddafi, the new Libya should be an “inclusive democracy,” open to all opinions, as long as those opinions include a commitment to “equality” and “democracy;” in other words, there must be a new dispensation of freedom in Libya, so long as that freedom does not extend beyond America’s definition of it. And if someone oversteps the lines of acceptable democracy, there are American bombs on the standby. In the context of France, however, it is clear that the demarcation of French politics according to globalist dictates cannot include any elements of so-called “xenophobia,” (sic) which in today’s context would include a return to the grand politics of the De Gaulle era. Hence, “Tactic 5” states:
Fifth, we will continue our project of sharing best practices with young leaders in all fields, including young political leaders of all moderate parties so that they have the toolkits and mentoring to move ahead. We will create or support training and exchange programs that teach the enduring value of broad inclusion to schools, civil society groups, bloggers, political advisors, and local politicians.[15]
Rivkin is outlining a program to train France’s future political and civic leaders. While the programs of US Government-backed NGOs such as the National Endowment for Democracy are designed to develop entire programs and strategies for political parties in “emerging democracies” (sic), this can be rationalized by stating that there is a lack of experience in liberal-democratic party politics in certain states. The same can hardly be used to justify America’s interference in France’s party politics. Towards this end Rivkin states that the 1000 American English language teachers employed at French schools will be provided with the propaganda materials necessary to inculcate the desired ideals into their French pupils: “We will also provide tools for teaching tolerance to the network of over 1,000 American university students who teach English in French schools every year.” The wide-ranging program will be co-ordinated by the “Minority Working Group” in “tandem” with the “Youth Outreach Initiative.” One of the issues monitored by the Group will be the “decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.” This is to ensure that the program is working as it should, to block the success of any “extreme” or “xenophobic” party that might challenge globalization.
Rivkin clarifies the subversive nature of the program when stating: “While we could never claim credit for these positive developments, we will focus our efforts in carrying out activities, described above, that prod, urge and stimulate movement in the right direction.”
What would the reaction be if the French Government through its Embassy in Washington undertook a program to radically change the USA in accordance with “French national interests,” inculcating through an “aggressive outreach program” focusing on youth, “French ideals” under the guise of “American ideals on human rights?” What would be the response of the US Administration if it was found that the French Government was trying to influence the attitudes of Afro-Americans, American-Indians, and Latinos? What if French officials were ordered to take every opportunity to “press” US officials to ask why there are not more American Indians in Government positions? What would be the official US reaction if it were found that French language educators in American schools and colleges were trying to inculcate American pupils with ideas in the service of French interests, and to reshape attitudes towards in a pro-French direction in foreign policy? The hypothetical reaction can be deduced from the US response to the “Soviet conspiracy” when Senate and Congressional committees were set up to investigate anyone even vaguely associated with or accused of being aligned to the USSR. So what’s different? The USA perpetrates a subversive strategy in the interests of it globalist cooperate elite, instead of in the interests of the USSR or communism. It is not as though the USA has had much of a cultural heritage that it can present itself to any European nation, let alone France, as the paragon of good taste and artistic refinement upon which a national identity can be reconstructed in a dialectical process that requires cultural deconstruction.
Every single person in France should read this article… I am desperately watching my country die and rot from the inside and it hurts.
Fabian is right. Every person in France should read this article. If French people wants to see the furture for themselves they could lookk
at Ireland where multiculturalism (or should I say monoculturalism/consumerism) began in the 1960’s with the Hollywood/Nashville culture and is now the accepted doctine propounded by all politicians and the media and dare anyone with a different view open thei mouth.
there is a french translation on a french blog :
http://www.defrancisation.com/le-projet-rivkin-comment-la-mondialisation-utilise-le-multiculturalisme-pour-assujettir-des-nations-souveraines/
Fabian,
You are not alone to suffer seeing France in such a state. But this article is spreading around and explains a lot. If those stinking people truly believe French and Europeans will be destroyed without moving a finger, they could meet with a hard and bad surprise.
Keep on hoping, even desesperately, resistance is showing up.
Being a fench citizen and former political elected from 1983 to 1995 i agree with the contain of this article, when i was a teen ager i had for the United States a relationship based on the role of that country in defeating the german third Reich and to me thesev are not words because one of my uncle was one of these kids who caame to fight in my country.
My opinion on us policy turned from favorable to completely opposed, Uncle’s Sam is no more an exemple, all the Wars of these fourty last years were a dishonest practice to sustain Israel in his hegemonic wievs, to manipulate the need for democracy in arabo-islamic world to get rid of many leaders who have been supported for decades.
My major reason to negate us pretention to lead the world is the way they act on financial matters, the IMF has been for years the main reason for hugue drastics cuts in third world couuntries mainly in Africa and now the cuts on eupopean countries while in the mean time the american economy is supported by the asiatic excedents of Japan during the eighties, China for this decade.
This policy is no longer acceptable there are no reason for the States to make other countries pay for their laxism and the speech about fighting for Liberty and Democracy is just bullshit . In fact the system is in hidden bankrupcy and it can’t be solved whitout an iconoclast measure of withdrawing the dolar as a reserve money, not any of american leaders will accept that but european countries will fight for that result otherwise the economical war will cause mlore dammage than WWII.
You are right Jean, those oligarchs are criminals.
But they are making huge mistakes and World will soon find out how to use so pretty stupid mistakes. Also, more than half of the World is hating not all Americans but those financial murderers as well as they hate the corrupted ones of their own countries. Will perhaps take a bit of time, but they will shed blood tears sooner than expected. Don’t say there won’t be any casualties, but they will have a very high price to pay. Meanwhile I can tell you that in my home Coca is banished as well as every american thing we can replace by European goods. That’s also a way to strike back, hit their wallet!
The article and comments give insight to the motives of global capitilcontrolled by US Impriist forces. Please forward more materials and articles as I am very much interested to understand the intrigues to change the ethnic , national and cultural identities of various peoples and nations. Express our solidarity.
Whatever is true in this characterization of the path French society is taking is undercut by the silliness of sating that a US diplomat has some responsibility for it. Rivkin did what an endless parade of French Bobos have done before him since the 1970s making specious arguments that international relations are interlaced with community relations.
The effect discussed has been taking place since the 80’s, and began in the mid-60’s for goodness’ sake.
So it’s no more no less than the Kalergi plan
Yup.
effing k|kes.
And Hitler was a ‘bad person”? Gimme a break.
Charles (((Rivken)))
Duly Noted. Every. Single Time.
This is the same as Jews bragging about controlling/subverting Egypt & Babylon ……. their entire history is that of parasitically attaching to healthy hosts and feeding.
Political Correctness was an intentional “invention” of socialists at the Frankfurt School back around 1930 to bring Marxist social conventions into mainstream society. Political Correctness has been accurately described as Cultural Marxism. Yes. PC is indeed a Marxist tool of conquest.
“Political Correctness” is a Jewish YOKE on the necks&mind of Christian Gentiles.
Any Bible reader knows what a YOKE is, and how the Jews brag about placing YOKES on Egypt and Babylon. The “holocaust” is a YOKE on the minds of Western Christians.
Slaves are not “allowed” to have opinions, beliefs, or thoughts.
Slaves are just supposed to unquestioningly do the bidding of the master .
THAT is what Political Correctness is, the YOKING/enslavement of the Gentiles.
Make the Goyim afraid to speak a word, or think a thought.
Why did Christian Spain throw the Jews out the day after the last muslim was expelled?
Because the Jews “played both sides” for 700 years of Christian oppression.
Jews instigated the pogroms against Christians in Rome.
Jewish Bolsevicks genocided TWENTY MILLION Ukrainian Christians in the Holomodor.
What the globalists are doing to destroy sovereign Nations such as America is exactly what they have learned from studying their Jewish history. The nations of Babylon and Assyria both used similar methodologies to accomplish the same goals and this is the elite globalist central bankster’s plot against the Nations of the world. The vatican has even joined them in this satanic venture. Read Revelation chapter 13 to find out more.