As in other states, IRI et al has created the opposition, training candidates in political techniques, “designing and implementing effective communications strategies, utilizing new media and public opinion research and training women candidates,” giving advice on how political parties can improve structures, write platforms to dupe the masses and raise funds.[28]
Ex-Reagan ambassador Richard S Williamson, an IRI Board Member, writing in the Neocon magazine, The American, published online by the American Enterprise Institute, urged US support for the revolt against Mubarak, and condemned the Egyptian and Tunisian regimes. With typical “spin,” Williamson has also sought to portray this as a “spontaneous revolt” by the young, never mind that IRI is more open about its role in training, funding and organizing this “spontaneity” over the course of six years:
These protesters were something new. Young and sophisticated with social networking media, they were able to communicate and organize. They were not driven by a leading personality. There was no ideology. It was a body with no head, driven by pent-up rage. Their numbers grew.[29]
In a 2006 statement NED’s President Carl Gershman, a veteran Trotskyite,[30] had already laid down strategies for Egypt, referring to Pres. Bush’s address on the 20th anniversary of NED, when Bush stated that “democracy” must sweep over the Arab world as it had over the Soviet bloc, and called for a “forward policy of freedom in the Middle East.” While Gershman stated at the time that such a strategy seemed to have stalled it should not be “consigned to the dustbin of history.” (Note the use of the famous, albeit poorly translated, term coined by Leon Trotsky?). Gershman called for a long-term strategy, engaging “activists” who could be induced to become “future leaders of centrist political parties.” Of particular interest is Gershman’s call to incorporate “Islamists” into the mainstream political process, where they could be rendered harmless, calling this “Muslim Democracy.” [31]
IRI also operates in the Gulf states, Iraq, Jordan, Morocco, Pakistan, West Bank and Gaza. Comment on their programs in all these states would be superfluous, as they follow the same pattern.[32]
In the Asian region, Burma or Myanmar might be of special interest because of the abortive “Saffron Revolution” in 2007. IRI sates it has been building the opposition since 1992.
IRI provides training and consultative advice on political campaign tactics and strategies to political individuals and organizations who work inside the country and who are living in exile. Topics include strategic planning, volunteer and membership recruitment, local level mobilization and voter turnout. Between late 2007 through May 2008, these activists utilized skills gained through the “Vote No” campaign, which was organized to urge Burmese citizens to reject the regime-drafted constitution during the May 2008 referendum.[33]
The interest of IRI and others in Burma/Myanmar might be explained more by the state’s autarchic economic policy than the question of “human rights.” Soros has long been interested in the state, the Open Society Institute having a special section called “The Burma Network: SE Asia Initiative.” The “Burma Project” was created by OSI in 1994 and expanded into the rest of Southeast Asia in the late 1990s, with a focus on Indonesia after the fall of Suharto in 1998.[34] OSI initiatives are of the same type as NED and IRI.
The omnipresent think tank the Council on Foreign Relations that, as one would expect, is represented by members in both IRI and OSI, has its own Task Force Burma, which includes Maureen Aung-Thwin, who is also director of Soros’ Burma Project. George C Biddle, a committee member of the CFR’s Task Force Burma, was formerly vice president of the International Crisis Group, another globalist think tank from which Egyptian leader-in-waiting ElBaradei has emerged,[35] touted as the potential leader of Egypt by IRI’s Williamson in the aforementioned article.[36]
What is more likely to perturb the globalists than “lack of democracy” is that the Burmese military established a command economy, and has provided credit to family farms and local industry, rather than going to the International Monetary Fund, not getting itself in hock to usury and then having to sell its assets and resources to transnational corporations in good “democratic,” free market fashion. The World Bank and IMF report on Myanmar states that there has not been an IMF supported program since 1981-1982. The World Bank has not approved any new lending since 1987 and “does not have an active program in Myanmar.”[37] A state that is not in debt to the international financial system is an anachronism in the “brave new world,” and one in dire need of a “spontaneous” revolt.
The region of “Eurasia’ is of special interest to George Soros and to IRI. As previously mentioned, Belarus is a particular culprit to be “regime changed.” IRI’s primary front group in the region is the Baltic-Eurasia Inter-Parliamentary Training Institute, initiated with a grant from the National Endowment for Democracy. IRI provides input and “links” to the new era of democratic politicians in Lithuania, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, to ready them for incorporation into the European Union; and advises government officials. The IRI program provides training seminars “on drafting legislation, committee procedures, information technology, research, the budget process, constituent service and parliamentary oversight.”[38]
In the target state of Belarus, in addition to the Unified Democratic Forces, previously mentioned there are other projects such as,
training the next generation of political leaders by offering them cross-cultural exchanges and trainings. The exchanges offer the Belarusian youth a forum in which they can freely discuss the issues that challenge them and devise strategies to tackle those issues while cultivating contacts and building networks with like-minded activists in neighboring countries.[39]
The IRI program in Russia follows the same pattern as elsewhere. What is interesting is the presumptuous, arrogant attitude of IRI, as well as of George Soros, et al that Russia needs the benefits of change as formulated by the globalists. Again IRI cultivates “civic leaders,” youth, women, etc. in the pursuit of a more “democratic society.” “IRI has been able to foster and educate civil leaders who are capable of establishing constituent-focused processes and advocating for reforms. …IRI has also been supporting Russia’s civil society by providing online and offline networking opportunities and high-quality expert advice.” IRI has established its front group, the “Women’s Democracy Network” in Russia.[40]
IRI’s program in Europe focuses on Central and Eastern Europe, “most notably through the Leadership Institute for Central and Eastern Europe. IRI has also been involved in the development of the European People’s Party, the primary centrist grouping in the European Parliament, which includes France’s Sarkozy, and encourages European relations with the USA. In Macedonia there is the Ohrid Institute for Economic Strategies and International Affairs.[41] In Latin America and the Caribbean, IRI follows the same path, and in particular encourages “civic groups” among Cubans, without mentioning specifics.[42]
Dr. Bolton clearly does not understand IRI or NDI’s work, but one wonders if he really even wants to. IRI and NDI do not export a version of democracy, they support reformers who are trying to strengthen or establish democracy in their own country. Why does Dr. Bolton find supporting those who want to be free so objectionable?
Freedom to do what – produce – consume – borrow, and get bombed if you don’t like it.
“…Support reformers…” – I thought the “revolts” were supposed to be “spontaneous”?
Most regimes say they want “democracy” including North Korea. The junk that vomits forth from the USA in the name of “democracy” is not something to emulate.
The essay has already been read and received an enthusiastic response from individuals who are very well placed to “understand” what’s going on.
Take taxpayer dollars and deploy them in Venezuela to help prepare a coup against Chavez. That’s exactly what these organization did prior to (and for all we are allowed to know) after April 2002.
Good article. Many of the old leftists-progressives-libs-Marxists-Socialists-Leninists-Stalinists-Trotskyites-Maoists moved over into the environmentalist movements and are now some of the loudest voices in the Global Warming Alarmist crowd. Their ultimate desire appears to be the imposition of a Global Carbon Tax which will be paid in to the UN, World Bank, or IMF.
Professor Bolton excellently interprets the current Arab revolt not as from “traditional Christian and Muslim Arabs” revolting against Americanization, but rather from bourgeois secular youth under the long-term influence and training of American globalists. I must now credit Professor Bolton’s cynical reference to “spontaneous revolt,” while now strongly suspecting that the globalists have lost control of what has become an actually spontaneous popular nationalist AND STILL UNCOORDIANATED uprising against the American proxy. If this is so, might the maze of coordinated interest groups jostling for advantage have been radically confused and forced to compromise? But what a brilliant survey. It ends, “It remains to be seen whether the “revolution” will backfire on the plutocrats.”
Excellent analysis Dr. Bolton; unfortunately I truly feel the movements/revolts that pose obstacles to the Globalist agenda will be easily mitigated.
The efforts by Egypt’s opposition front – most notably the Muslim Brotherhood will be hindered by conventional concerns of instability in the region (Israel) with Mubarak’s swift departure .
Perhaps the IRI and NDI should attempt to support the reformers in the U.S., who strive to be governed by the principles that were laid forth in the Constitution.
The nationalization of the Fed should be the foremost priority of the IRI et al, as governance by this xenophobic Central Bank that is hell bent on the demise of the American economy through the utilization of fiat currency traverses the spirit of democratic rule.
Rule One in Writing: Omit needless words.