<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: 9/11 &#8211; Unanswered Questions</title> <atom:link href="http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/</link> <description>World news, political analysis, and opinion commentary</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Moign Khawaja</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-15052</link> <dc:creator>Moign Khawaja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-15052</guid> <description>It&#039;s a trove of information on 9/11. Very valuable. Thanks indeed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a trove of information on 9/11. Very valuable. Thanks indeed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moign Khawaja</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-15050</link> <dc:creator>Moign Khawaja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-15050</guid> <description>Absolutely right! I further your observations.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right! I further your observations.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: http://nolimitleads.com</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-13150</link> <dc:creator>http://nolimitleads.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:57:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-13150</guid> <description>Thanks to you for this essential article. Where I can get more information about this writting? I have a presentation incoming this week and your writting is related with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to you for this essential article. Where I can get more information about this writting? I have a presentation incoming this week and your writting is related with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JZ</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1956</link> <dc:creator>JZ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1956</guid> <description>For those not aware of it, check out http://historycommons.org and the movie spawned from that website called 9/11: Press for Truth. To me, those are the most potent resources and best formatted resources to get more people to examine the vast open sources that reveal many clues to circumstances long before 9/11, during, and thereafter up to now.Executive Director, Earth Intelligence Network, 501c3/non-profit http://www.phibetaiota.net http://twitter.com/earthintelnet http://youtube.com/earthintelnet http://tr.im/irCi</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those not aware of it, check out <a href="http://historycommons.org" rel="nofollow">http://historycommons.org</a> and the movie spawned from that website called 9/11: Press for Truth. To me, those are the most potent resources and best formatted resources to get more people to examine the vast open sources that reveal many clues to circumstances long before 9/11, during, and thereafter up to now.</p><p>Executive Director, Earth Intelligence Network, 501c3/non-profit<br /> <a href="http://www.phibetaiota.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.phibetaiota.net</a><br /> <a href="http://twitter.com/earthintelnet" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/earthintelnet</a><br /> <a href="http://youtube.com/earthintelnet" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/earthintelnet</a><br /> <a href="http://tr.im/irCi" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/irCi</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john doe</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link> <dc:creator>john doe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:03:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1559</guid> <description>Operation Northwoods: military plan from the &#039;60s to stage false-flag attacks against targets in the US and at the US Guantanamo Bay base to create a pretext for war against Cuba. Included hijacking of passenger planes.Never &quot;officially&quot; accepted or executed, but we all know the CIA often works in an un-official capacity.Who benefits? A bunch of ragtag extremists hiding in caves, armed with Cold War era weapons, whose best case scenario in a conflict with the US would be a draw, war by attrition as in Vietnam? Or would it be elements of the military-industrial complex and intelligence agencies like the CIA who receive what eventually amounts to trillions in funding? Without some looming, ambiguous threat on the horizon (such as communism during the Cold War), neither has a job. Just my 2 cents.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operation Northwoods: military plan from the &#8217;60s to stage false-flag attacks against targets in the US and at the US Guantanamo Bay base to create a pretext for war against Cuba. Included hijacking of passenger planes.</p><p>Never &#8220;officially&#8221; accepted or executed, but we all know the CIA often works in an un-official capacity.</p><p>Who benefits? A bunch of ragtag extremists hiding in caves, armed with Cold War era weapons, whose best case scenario in a conflict with the US would be a draw, war by attrition as in Vietnam? Or would it be elements of the military-industrial complex and intelligence agencies like the CIA who receive what eventually amounts to trillions in funding? Without some looming, ambiguous threat on the horizon (such as communism during the Cold War), neither has a job.<br /> Just my 2 cents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moign Khawaja</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link> <dc:creator>Moign Khawaja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:24:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1491</guid> <description>Nice one!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moign Khawaja</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link> <dc:creator>Moign Khawaja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:23:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1490</guid> <description>I&#039;ll agree with you again Bill. But its nice that the oil doesn&#039;t runs out and a truly welfare government assumes its control and uses it to finance poor countries across the Muslim world. This in turn will alienate the people from extremism and sense of deprivation and create a new commonwealth of nations. These Salafis, as you mentioned, prey on poor, frustrated youth who have no clear goal of life. Once they&#039;ll be given some power and shown a way, I&#039;m damn sure that extremism will die its natural death and birth of a new civilisation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with you again Bill. But its nice that the oil doesn&#8217;t runs out and a truly welfare government assumes its control and uses it to finance poor countries across the Muslim world. This in turn will alienate the people from extremism and sense of deprivation and create a new commonwealth of nations. These Salafis, as you mentioned, prey on poor, frustrated youth who have no clear goal of life. Once they&#8217;ll be given some power and shown a way, I&#8217;m damn sure that extremism will die its natural death and birth of a new civilisation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Davit</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link> <dc:creator>Bill Davit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1395</guid> <description>Moign,Couldn&#039;t agree more.  We have all seen the effects the neocons had on the US and the political Islamists, such as the Iranian regime, have had on the common citizen.  The good news is we have tools like the Internet and no secrect is left undiscovered for to long.  I am not a fan of many of Obama&#039;s policies but I voted for him for one reason.  That reason being reconciliation with the rest of the world.  The US economy will recover as it always had but the same could not be said for our standing in the rest of the world.  I believe Obama gives our nation the best chance to remerge as a champion of liberty and freedom like we used to be.   Once we gain that political capital back Obama can then go about promoting democracy across the world and especially in the Middle East.  Once that is well under way I would love for him to go rap the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Wahhabis on the nose and get them to stop preaching their intolerant segregated view of the Kafir vs. the best of peoples.  It is no mystery that the majority of the seperatist movements today have a Salafi ideology often funded by the two aforementioned organizations.  The Neocons often looked the other way in the past because it helped them with their agendas.  The Saudis are the best example of someone who happens to be our &quot;friend&quot; but in reality are the fountain head of the nastiest ideologies across the globe.  Hopefully their oil will dry up soon then they can realize what it really takes to build a true functioning state!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moign,</p><p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more.  We have all seen the effects the neocons had on the US and the political Islamists, such as the Iranian regime, have had on the common citizen.  The good news is we have tools like the Internet and no secrect is left undiscovered for to long.  I am not a fan of many of Obama&#8217;s policies but I voted for him for one reason.  That reason being reconciliation with the rest of the world.  The US economy will recover as it always had but the same could not be said for our standing in the rest of the world.  I believe Obama gives our nation the best chance to remerge as a champion of liberty and freedom like we used to be.   Once we gain that political capital back Obama can then go about promoting democracy across the world and especially in the Middle East.  Once that is well under way I would love for him to go rap the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Wahhabis on the nose and get them to stop preaching their intolerant segregated view of the Kafir vs. the best of peoples.  It is no mystery that the majority of the seperatist movements today have a Salafi ideology often funded by the two aforementioned organizations.  The Neocons often looked the other way in the past because it helped them with their agendas.  The Saudis are the best example of someone who happens to be our &#8220;friend&#8221; but in reality are the fountain head of the nastiest ideologies across the globe.  Hopefully their oil will dry up soon then they can realize what it really takes to build a true functioning state!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moign Khawaja</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link> <dc:creator>Moign Khawaja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1363</guid> <description>@ Bill DavitThe difference between neocons and neo-Islamists is dangerously thin. But share the hatred towards each other and would like to dominate the world with their rigorous ideas. These ideas, they say, can only be imposed with force, consequently allowing the use of violence. The parties that gained power from 9/11 and related incidents are the US-backed governments and al-Qaeda. Common people like you and me are made to live in a world of terror, suspicion and misunderstanding...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill Davit</p><p>The difference between neocons and neo-Islamists is dangerously thin. But share the hatred towards each other and would like to dominate the world with their rigorous ideas. These ideas, they say, can only be imposed with force, consequently allowing the use of violence. The parties that gained power from 9/11 and related incidents are the US-backed governments and al-Qaeda. Common people like you and me are made to live in a world of terror, suspicion and misunderstanding&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Davit</title><link>http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/16/911-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link> <dc:creator>Bill Davit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:21:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/?p=2017#comment-1360</guid> <description>Moign Khawaja,I do not believe in the conspiracy theories but I wanted to commend you on your last statement on 9/19 at 12:12 am.  Regardless of what happend and who did it your 100% correct on the attitude America needs to take towards the world.  For to long the neocons and the Political islamists have been using this event to justify their ends moving us towards the &#039;clash of civilizations.&#039;  The good news is they are in the minority but the bad news is on either side these parties hold way to much power.  Hopefully sanity will prevail and many will realize the attitude towards each other needs to be towards finding solutions not differences.   You don&#039;t win by drawing lines in the sand but by honest dialogue.  If only these people could take to heart the workds of King, Ghandi, and especially Mandela.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moign Khawaja,</p><p>I do not believe in the conspiracy theories but I wanted to commend you on your last statement on 9/19 at 12:12 am.  Regardless of what happend and who did it your 100% correct on the attitude America needs to take towards the world.  For to long the neocons and the Political islamists have been using this event to justify their ends moving us towards the &#8216;clash of civilizations.&#8217;  The good news is they are in the minority but the bad news is on either side these parties hold way to much power.  Hopefully sanity will prevail and many will realize the attitude towards each other needs to be towards finding solutions not differences.   You don&#8217;t win by drawing lines in the sand but by honest dialogue.  If only these people could take to heart the workds of King, Ghandi, and especially Mandela.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.foreignpolicyjournal.com @ 2012-02-08 14:44:39 by W3 Total Cache -->
