We as Iranians making such claims you do not beleive us, but you refer to Robert Fisk Statements, who knows he is right, and is there any reasonable and constructive foundation for his claim. again, all the journalists are banned in Tehrans Streets, how come, he is not banned. how can he approach anti police iot.

it seems suspicious to me, because your statement reveals, that Mr Robert, is one of those traditional and classic Communist, which justify all kind of acts against capitalists. I mean they support and justify athouritarian and dictator regime who are against the west.

the only media and journalist allowed to attend the rallies are the one of pro-regime, so it means the reference you refered to is not reliable, as it is based on his personal perspective toward the west. again, why does some people want to reenge and retaliate by justifying inhuman and dictator regimes.

Dear. Readers. Some od Traditional and classic communists, who failled, specially after the collapse of USSR, are pro-authoritarian regimes, such Iran, Fanzeula, China, North Korea, and others around the glob. therefore, in their writing the human right and ethic, moral is lacking, when they judge an event. they think if the Iranian regime exist, capitalism and imperialism will be weakend and eliminated from the region. they does not know, if it is not because of imperialisms slave “Iranian regime” West would not have been allowed, or would not have been able to be present at the region. beause of the Iranian regimes conduct and threat that imposes o the region, the west justified its presence in the region. but who is going to pay it back, we as iranians, sanctions on current regime cause next generation alot of difficulties, and we have to pay the debt back.

you know imperialist does not make great profit on arm salling at the time of the war and coonflicts, instead, they make profit on the debt, “money they lend it to the conflicts party”.

I could say that because the means of material production is controled by fundamental islamic clerics in Iran, the means of mental production also under their absolute control internally and externally.

Iranians outside the Iran, are inciting people to support the legitimacy of fruad and rigged election, and they are freely allowed to express their political, social and economic veiw, in addition they criticise who they want in bias way. but never they asked them selves, is it possible in Iran. Mr Nima lives in USA, freely criticies us administration, but if he do it in Iran, i mean if he critiises the leader and president in same way in Iran, he will be stonned or will be sentenced to death by the leaders courts.

Mr Jeremmy, have you asked your self, why the Lebenes anti riot police are involved, which they are not anti riot police, diversely, they are death team. currently there are 5000 foreign militia oppressing the protestors. where is the moral and humanity, to that extent, we should humiliate our ethics and morality with no reasonable foundation for our support to the Iranian theocratics.

assume majority of the people were voted for the islamic system in Iran, 30 years, it does not mean it should be accepted by current generation or the future generations. i am not legally and morally bound to what my parents voted for and agreed on. we want freedom.

however, some commentators do support current system, not because they consider it legitimate, no, because they does not want iranian peoples to have real natural freedom. they know if the regime collapse there will be a democratic state, equality, freedom of expression, human right. but some people does not want Iranians to enjoy their natural rights, as it will lead them to make progress socially , economically and politically, because they know Iranian have some kind of potential power.

thanks

Huh? Math aside, where’d you come by this logic?

For Shirazi, Petras, Afrasiabi et al…. the fact that we’re talking about:

– a most brutal THEOCRACY, which practices GENDER-APARTHEID on half of country’s population, Iranian women. A regime which has introduced stoning to death…
– a country with 70% of the work force employed on TEMPORARY WORK CONTRACTS, lasting only for 89 days before they’re fired and hired again for another 89 days.
– a regime plagued by consistent protests by popular radical social movements on weekly, monthly and annual basis; students ( including Socialist students, who actaully have a class analysis of Islamic Republic )on 16th of Azar, women networks On March 8th. Workers on May 1st….

and thousand of other examples that could be cited, are all just “impressions” of mainstream western media, not class and political realities of Iranian society.
As Soran also mentioned above social movements are like tornados, and what this electoral coup has effectively done is to pour hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of hitherto apathetic or content observors into the ranks of protestors/activists, many thanks to “Mahmud Shah.”
The last time such a societal shift occured [1977-79] we witnessed the most massive revolution at the end of the 20th century. Will we be witnessing the most massive revoultion at the beginning of the 21st century? It’s going to be a bumpy ride, cheers
-Hoshang

i am really surprised when i saw such a large rally in Tehran and other cities streets. if Iranian system still popular and people still want it, how come, such a large number of people incited by west. 13m voted Mossavi and around 3Millions voted Karubi, It means west is suported by 18 Million Iranians and west is more popular than Ahmadinezhad and his leader.

i am sure if they could purchase back their statement, they will do it, because they attempted to assure that the system has no problem with the people, and the unrest is not a result of fruad.

around 25 million of iranians are Muslim Sunni. I assure you none of them voted for Ahmadinezhad, because of his past 4 years aggressive and discriminatory policies toward them. Mr Ahmadinezhad Policies are based on Safavis ideological principles, which to wipe all religious minorities in Iran, and establishing 100% Shaeizm state in Iran.

Kurds are 13 Million none of them voted for Ahmadinezhad, as he is the hated person among the Kurds because of his discriminatory policies, and the voilence his governemt used against them during last 4 years. since 2005 around 2000 Kurds have been killed just because they are kurds, some of the killings were occured through a car crush(senario played by ahmads governmet.

50% of iranian population are women, to what extent it can be realistic to say that the iranian women voted for their stonning conviction. since his presidency the stonning punishment was doubled comparing to the previous governments.

Few weeks before the election, IRGG, and Supreme leader office played a nasty senario in sistan and baluchestan. they organised a sucid attack in mousq which resulted in 25 death and 100s of causalties. this was to incite the Shia fundamentalists to vote for ahmadinezhad. because Mr Mousavis Manefesto was including the religion minorities right, supreme leader tried through this act of crime to incite shia to vote for his DIdolo, and was conspiracy, to say look, if mossavi win, he will give a right to sunni muslim, and then there will bloodshed, and they will explod all shia mousqe.

Nima Shiarazi, today or tomorrow they have to leave that country, because of the democratic uprising, and social movements are like huricans and Tornaidos, no power can stop or disrupt them. in addition, if the political turmoil is CIAs plam, it would have been such unorganized and leaderless.